Message Boards

Topic : News, Politics and Current Events

Number of Replies: 10264
New Messages This Week: 0
Last Reply On:
Created on : Wednesday, November 28, 2007, 05:18:57 pm
Author : pennylane_78
Please join us on the new News, Politics and Current Events message board: Click here

As of January, 2009, this message board will become "Read Only" and will be closed to further posting. Please join the NEW Dr. Phil Community to continue your discussions, personalize your message board experience, start a blog and meet new friends.

User Mood
Peaceful

Message Emote
blank
March 2, 2009, 8:46 am PST

oh yeah, the soup...

Quote From: kathleen27

How much snow did you guys get?  They expect that the City will get a FOOT of snow tomorrow!  Crap!  Who needs it?  Glad you made it home in time, and the conference sounds like it was very interesting.

I'm with you...love soup, especially cream of potato.  Maybe I'll make it tomorrow, cause I will NOT be going any place in a foot of snow.

Kathy

It is a potato-sausage soup (inspired by the kind they serve at Olive Garden)  We made it last night- because my husband had a mad craving for buffalo wings Saturday- with cheese bread... and it was yummy!  We still have quite a bit of snow around here and it is cold, so I packed some leftover potato soup (with love) for my husband to keep warm today at work.

 
User Mood
Peaceful

Message Emote
blank
March 2, 2009, 9:15 am PST

News, Politics and Current Events

Quote From: feistyd

Friday, February 27, 2009   By Leslie Miller

 

LOS ANGELES, Mid-Wilshire (KABC) -- Nadya Suleman was offered help to provide for her medical and emotional needs of her children. But she turned that offer down. Besides the octuplets, Suleman has six other young children.

Nadya Suleman is a single, unemployed mother of 14, including octuplets born a month ago. She's about to lose her home and does not have the financial means to care for her children. So why would she turn down a charitable offer of help?

Only Suleman knows for sure, but attorney Gloria Allred believes Suleman is more interested in profiting from her kids.

Allred wants the world to know that the woman known as "octomom" doesn't want her help. Allred represents Angels In Waiting, a nonprofit group that offered 24-hour-seven-days-a-week care for Nadya Suleman's 14 children in a home where they'd receive individualized care from professionals.

Nadya and her parents would be welcome and the family could be together," said Allred. "Angels In Waiting would ask the public for donations and there would be no burden to the taxpayer."

After several phone conversations with Suleman, Allred and Angels In Waiting had a meeting set up with her for last Monday, but Suleman never showed.

They say Suleman seemed more interested in capitalizing on her infants than caring for them -- by asking to do a reality show -- and hold press conferences every two weeks updating the babies' conditions.

"I told her a reality show is a definite no," said Linda West Conforti, Angels In Waiting. "I educated Nadya that we would have a total of 28 people a day in our home and that her preemies are an open Petri dish due to their low immune system."

Allred says she set a deadline for Suleman to accept the offer, to give Angels In Waiting time to get their team in place and seek donations from the public, before the babies are released from the hospital. That deadline expired at midnight Thursday. Allred says she and Angels In Waiting are concerned about the protection of Suleman's children.

"We believe the next step should be that the L.A. County Department of Child and Family Services, with whom I have filed a request for an investigation, should make sure that these children are protected," said Allred.

Nadya Suleman's publicist was not available for comment. As for the octuplets, they remain hospitalized in stable condition. Doctors say they are alert, responsive, and doing well.

Did anyone see Nadya's interview with Dr. Phil?  I missed it, but I read the entire transcript last night...

http://drphil.com/shows/show/1231

It was rather lenthy, going back and forth about how she "never intended to have octuplets...maybe one or two, at most" (which was strange in and of itself) and her insistance with Dr. Phil that she "hates the media attention" just doesn't square with this story... hmmmm.  Dr. Phil also interviewed Nadya's mom, along side Nadya, and I gotta say that something is definately off with that mother-daughter relationship, to say the least.  I don't know, her mother just does and says things that give me pause for concern... like tricking her daughter into seeing a tharapist (????) stating on national television that her daughter "will be punished" for her choices (???? well, that's a given, but it seemed like she was hoping for retribution) what kind of mother does that, and how can anyone expect the rest of America to see Nadya with compassion if her own mother is wishing her ill on national tv, no less?  In my opinion, Dr. Phil has some work to do in that area as well... for the sake of Nadya's emotional well being and for the sake of the entire family.  Am I correct in that the hospital has declared that it WILL NOT release the babies to Nadya until she furnishes a home with enough room for them all?

 
User Mood
Peaceful

Message Emote
blank
March 2, 2009, 9:31 am PST

News, Politics and Current Events

THIS is precisely why Americans are not getting behind same-sex "marriage" and the so called Hate Crimes Bills, to include sexual orientation.  If something like this could happen in a state that has approved of a marriage amendment, what can Americans expect in states that do not?

 

"A classroom dispute at Los Angeles City College in the emotional aftermath of Proposition 8 has given rise to a lawsuit testing the balance between 1st Amendment rights and school codes on offensive speech.
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/politics/cal/la-me-speech16-2009feb16,0,6896300.story
Student Jonathan Lopez says his professor called him a "fascist b****rd" and refused to let him finish his speech against same-sex marriage during a public speaking class last November, weeks after California voters approved the ban on such unions.

When Lopez tried to find out his mark for the speech, the professor, John Matteson, allegedly told him to "ask God what your grade is," the suit says.

Lopez also said the teacher threatened to have him expelled when he complained to higher-ups.

In addition to financial damages, the suit, filed last week in U.S. District Court in Los Angeles, seeks to strike down a sexual harassment code barring students from uttering "offensive" statements...

Alliance staff counsel David J. Hacker said Lopez was a victim of religious discrimination.

"He was expressing his faith during an open-ended assignment, but when the professor disagreed with some minor things he mentioned, the professor shut him down," Hacker said. "Basically, colleges and universities should give Christian students the same rights to free expression as other students."

Hacker said Alliance filed a similar suit in 2006 against Missouri State University over the school's attempt to discipline a Christian social-work student who refused to support adoptions by same-sex couples. The college settled the suit by, among other things, ordering an external review of the social-work program, Hacker said.

The Los Angeles Community College District's offices were closed Friday for the Presidents Day holiday, and the general counsel, Camille A. Goulet, could not be reached. But in a letter to Alliance, the district said it deemed Lopez's complaint "extremely serious in nature" and had launched a private disciplinary process.

In the letter, Dean Allison Jones also said that two students had been "deeply offended" by Lopez's address, one of whom stated that "this student should have to pay some price for preaching hate in the classroom."

Hacker said the district's response was inadequate.

"What they didn't do was ensure this wouldn't happen to other students," he said. "The dean accused Jonathan of offending other students."

The suit names the Los Angeles Community College District, which operates nine campuses including L.A. City College; its board of trustees; Matteson; and various administrators. Lopez is asking for a jury trial"
  That's a smart move, considering the libral, freedom hating position the justices of CA have taken in recent years
 
User Mood
Worried

Message Emote
chillin'
March 2, 2009, 10:47 am PST

sweet!!!

Quote From: Pleasance

Socialism...really?  Hmmm.....

 

Sean Hannity, Limbaugh, Ingrahm, Colter, Beck....more from the far right.

 

We just wrapped up eight years, 8 years... of the largest government expansion in our country's history.  Yet,  these voices would have you believe the recovery bill as the largest  government expansion in our country's history. 

 

They call it socialism, they call Our President Obama a socialist , a fascist...these are the voices on the far right.

 

Socialist, socialism...socialist government , socialist government programs?

 

Well, ok....(sarcasm here, on my part)    ok......send it all back, stop it.....end it ......American's are not socialists.......get rid of it.  All of it.......might as well start, start now....start here...

 

...start here

  •   refuse to send your children to socialized public schools
  •   refuse to allow your children to attend a public university
  •   refuse to use socialized public roads
  •   refuse to use socialized highways
  •   refuse to call upon socialized fire departments
  •   refuse to call upon socialized police departments
  •   refuse socialized air traffic control
  •   refuse to visit socialized national parks
  •   tell Grandma that her social security money has to be sent back to the government
  •   and Medicare (her social security health insurance)
  •  we would have to dismantle our socialized American military
  •  Sarah Palin and her supporters in Alaska need to refuse all forms of redistributed wealth by sending back their checks from the socialized oil program there.

Who needs roads, fire departments?

 

As for the pre-socialist 50- percent rate of poverty for the elderly....well, somebody can invent some bootstraps for granny.

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

i was born in australia, but raised in germany.
i guess that says all!: )
we have it good!
and so will ALL of you... thanx to sozialism and obama!!!

n.c.s.
 
User Mood
Relaxed

Message Emote
chillin'
March 2, 2009, 11:50 am PST

yep

Quote From: getrealtime

You been on this board, what do you think it will take to wake up the Dems??? What policys have you seen any Obama support defend??? They defend the man but never how his policys will effect this country. You myself and other that did not vote for obama have posted  how we think that this new Stim bill does not stim, or his policys effect and change what this country was built on but his supports spin it to religion, or past Pres. But they never tell us how they think that this Bill will work????

 

Never have I seen where the Man himself was more important then how his policy will effect this country.

Protecting the man is more important then protecting this nations economic health.

 

J.

I wonder if that's why this board is getting scarce for posters, all the Obama supporters have jumped ship.

 

Nothing to argue anymore?

 
User Mood
Worried

Message Emote
blank
March 2, 2009, 11:52 am PST

News, Politics and Current Events

Quote From: Pleasance

Where is the outrage?

 

Chris Brown / a bloodied, beaten, bitten Rihanna ...

 

 

 

and how did those police photos get out there and published?

 

Where are the victim's rights?

 

 

i´m surprised you´re the only one writing anything about it!?!...

i felt so sorry for her, as it came on tv!
as i saw the pic, i could have cried!!!
she looked so broken and not from the external wounds...
shame on the people responseble for exploiting her so shamelessly!!!

but i guess that was´nt embarrising enough!?!
she has chosen to keep on being a victim and a letdown for all females and fans!...

40% of teenange girls are in violent relationships!
so, who´s responseble for them staying there?
NOT THE OFFENDER! the parents & the victim!
...maybe even stars, girls look up to, or identify with!...

i hope she realises quick, that she needs help with her perception of love!
i mean, how more degrading & embarring can it get? and the all the world is watching...

feeling sorry...

n.c.s.










 
User Mood
Relaxed

Message Emote
chillin'
March 2, 2009, 11:56 am PST

Probably?

Quote From: kustomlady

Will you atleast pop in every now and again and let me know what you have been up to?

I've been on the boards since 2004, so I will probably stick my nose in here somewhere every now and then.

We'll see what happens.

 
User Mood
Relaxed

Message Emote
surprised
March 2, 2009, 12:12 pm PST

OMG!

Quote From: kustomlady

Let the "tea party" begin... Oklahoma passes sovereignty bill http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=89842   Oklahoma's House of Representatives is the first legislative body to pass a state sovereignty resolution this year under the terms of the Tenth Amendment.

 

The Oklahoma House of Representatives passed House Joint Resolution 1003 Feb. 18 by a wide margin, 83 to 13, resolving, "That the State of Oklahoma hereby claims sovereignty under the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States over all powers not otherwise enumerated and granted to the federal government by the Constitution of the United States."

The language of HJR 1003 further serves notice to the federal government "to cease and desist, effectively immediately, mandates that are beyond the scope of these constitutionally delegated powers."

 

The sponsor of the resolution, state Rep. Charles Key, told WND the measure was a 'big step toward addressing the biggest problem we have in this country the federal government violating the supreme law of the land." ...

 

eight states have introduced resolutions declaring state sovereignty under the Ninth and Tenth Amendments to the Constitution: Arizona, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, New Hampshire, Oklahoma and Washington.

Analysts expect 12 additional states may see similar measures introduced this year, including Alaska, Alabama, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Nevada, Maine and Pennsylvania.

Do you all realize what this means?

 
User Mood
Relaxed

Message Emote
angry
March 2, 2009, 12:14 pm PST

Don't count on it!

Quote From: fashionvic

i was born in australia, but raised in germany.
i guess that says all!: )
we have it good!
and so will ALL of you... thanx to sozialism and obama!!!

n.c.s.

The states are declaring their wrath of the actions of the Obama administration.

 

Stay tuned.

 
User Mood
Peaceful

Message Emote
blank
March 2, 2009, 1:26 pm PST

News, Politics and Current Events

Quote From: nscrchick

That is a good question.  One I have pondered.  I was always under the impression that the "morning after pill" was basically equivalent to an abortion.  In fact, I work in a hospital pharmacy and I have refused to take the "morning after pill" down to the ER.  I said I couldn't do it because I did not want to in any way shape or form be involved in the death of a baby. 

There is actually 2 different "after" pills.  There is the "morning after pill" (not available in this country legally) and "emergency contraception."  My pharmacist explained it this way:

 

The morning after pill will expell an embryo, will abort the baby.

 

The emergency contraception will prevent the fertilized egg from implanting in the uterine wall.  And it may be taken up to 3 days later.  They are actually birth control pills, just taken in a larger dose.

 

Don't know if this helps, but man it has raised some questions for me.  I have been on B.C.P. for 19 years.  And I am now in a serious dilemma.  To me it would seem that stopping a fertilized egg from implanting may be the same as killing it.  Oh God. Oh God.  Oh boy, I need to do some more research on this, if I have to live with the thought that I may have unknowingly  killed and unborn baby of mine...OH GOD

Well, with many of the posts gone now, I have been given the rare opportunity to read this post.  Coincidence?  Incidently, I have been thinking about doctors' conscience protections- that Bush enstated just days before leaving office- for two days now because Obama has recently begun the process of removing them...

 

http://www.lifenews.com/nat4865.html   How will this effect you and your family?  Removing doctors' protections will force good doctors out of practice, severely limiting your health care choices and consequently effect the quality of health care.  President Obama needs to know that he is not responsible to the abortion industry, but rather to the American people and we should not be forced to put the health and well being of our families in the hands of doctors who do not value human life.  Fortunately, the president plans to spend the next month listening to the public's opinion on doctors' right to conscience, and in less than one minute, you can send President Obama a message telling him that you do not want your health care choices limited to a selection of butchers... http://www.sba-list.org/c.ddJBKJNsFqG/b.4179747/siteapps/advocacy/ActionItem.aspx?aid=11823   If you don't speak up, you can bet that abortion advocates will gladly do it for you!   This post has touched on one of the reasons for why women deserve doctors with a conscience.  For more information about how Obama's policies on health care hurt women... Obama's Suppression of Health Care Workers' Conscience Rights will Worsen Breast Cancer, Premature Birth Epidemics http://www.christiannewswire.com/news/240179594.html
 
First | Prev | 809 | 810 | 811 | 812 | 813 | 814 | 815 | 816 | 817 | 818 | Next | Last