Message Boards

Topic : 01/28 The Baggy Pants Debate

Number of Replies: 1249
New Messages This Week: 0
Last Reply On:
Created on : Friday, January 25, 2008, 01:17:35 pm
Author : DrPhilBoard1
Do you think the government should be allowed to keep you from wearing something others may find offensive? A debate is gaining attention across the country: Should baggy pants be banned? You’ve seen them, primarily worn by men: oversized pants hanging so low that sometimes the entire behind shows! Local ordinances in 12 states have banned the low-slung look -– but are they unfairly targeting African-Americans? Dr. Phil speaks with guests on both sides of the debate -- including parents. And, Reverend Al Sharpton and Grammy nominated hip-hip artists the Ying Yang Twins join the show with their views on banning baggy pants. Get up to speed on this issue, before YOU get caught with your pants down! Join the discussion.

Find out what happened on the show.

As of January, 2009, this message board will become "Read Only" and will be closed to further posting. Please join the NEW Dr. Phil Community to continue your discussions, personalize your message board experience, start a blog and meet new friends.

User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
January 28, 2008, 8:43 pm PST

01/28 The Baggy Pants Debate

Quote From: irisa_v

Hi All,

 

I just joined. I am from Nevada. I am only reporting what I was told by an assistant warden of one of the penitentiaries. He cured his own boys of wearing baggy pants at the hips, by telling them the style started showing up in prisons, to show availability for male to male sex. This was by flaunting the backside and underwear with hip level baggy pants. Some men who were termed "bitches" were made to wear them low like that to show they may have "belonged" to someone else or were willing to be "receivers." He said it started way back, maybe in the early eighties. My argument is there are no belts allowed in prison, but you can buy pants out of jail that aren't four sizes too big so they hang that low! It may have just turned into mainly a "prison chic" after some time then moved on to "street chic," I will say that. So this tale of origin may cure men of wanting to carry on that "look."

 

Irisa

God bless you!   My kids don't 'sag' but when I tell them what you said they NEVER will!!    hehehe
 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
surprised
January 28, 2008, 8:47 pm PST

Baggy pants vs. Hip hugger jeans

Dr. Phil

 

 I watched your show today and was very surprised of all the talk on baggy pants but not one said a word about the girls walking around with the hip huugers and g-string hanging out .  If there is a problem with the pants for nem and boys make one also for the females.  I say just have repect for yourself and others around you.  I see these young ladies with low cut top and there but hanging out at least with the guys you do not see there but just the underwear. 

 

 I have children and I too believe it is up the the parents to moniter what there kids wear i check my kids everyday but as parent you be with them all the time you have to trust they will do the right thing.  And as for the Mayor of Dallas a man is not the only one that can make a man out of a boy there are alot of single mothers out there that have raised men and not boys.  So. I guess you are saying only a women can raise a girl what about the men that were raise by women and stepped up and are raising there children now.  You have just as many single men and women raising kids and they are turning out fine. 

 

Don't police what people wear it is just clothes and people do change keep the canpaign going it may work.    Good Luck   

 
User Mood
Peaceful

Message Emote
blank
January 28, 2008, 8:48 pm PST

01/28 The Baggy Pants Debate

Quote From: palomapdx

The fact that you say "I love GAY people" instead of just saying  "I respect all human beings"  separates "gay" from everyone else.  All people should be proud of who they are if they are of integrity, respectful and honest.  What one does in the privacy of their home should be left there...period.  There is far too much division and hate in this country because people choose to catagorize and sub-catagorize (on both sides).  We are all human beings and, in this country, we are all American.  Use courtesy, common sense and manners when dealing with others, it goes a long way.  People forget their manners far too much anymore.

 

I can tell you are quite young, I'm sure you meant well, and I applaud you for speaking your mind.  I'm sure your mom loved her brother and is keeping his memory alive by passing down wonderful stories to you.  It's not the fact that he was gay that made him a wonderful person. It's the fact that HE was a wonderful person.  Most of my friends who happen to be gay would much rather be thought of as a person first, not a label.  I'm sure your uncle would have agreed.

OK first off you calling me young  is categorizing me  just like me calling someone gay. but just like i am heterosexual if i can't say it because it offends people how am i suppose to talk about it.  if i said hey you everyone would look. but i think you are getting completely of the subject. I liked that song because it gave a positive message in the hip hop community that a lot of hip hop music doesn't have. i was just telling him that sometimes you have to take things with a grain of salt. if you picked every fight you would be mad at world. i don't think he meant to offend anyone. i think it came across wrong. but i can still see how it could be offensive. i feel like i shared a story that meant alot to me. i know it means alot to my mom because she really loved him and he died to soon. but don't speak to me about what my uncle would have said. if you knew my grandpa you would think about alot of things differently. he was not a nice man. when my uncle was my age he had to fight to be gay he wanted to be accepted but he wasn't. my mom was the only one who loved him for who he was. and you'll have to forgive if i come across rude because this means alot to me because my mom means the world to me. so share the love i hate no one gay or not white or black pink or purple. I'm sorry if i offend you by saying gay. i didn't mean it like that but i guess thats how you see it.
 
User Mood
Relaxed

Message Emote
angry
January 28, 2008, 8:51 pm PST

baggy pants and hip hop responsabilty

First of all Dr. Phil i have to say telling people what they can and can't wear when fashions are always changing just tells me that or government is really ignoring the more important problems in the world.Instead of making laws to an sagging pants they need to make laws to hold parents accountable for failing to parent their children.I am just so sick and tired of people running around acting like crime and disorder started with hip hop.I have 6 boys and 3 girls ages 9years old to 20 years old and i know its my job to teach them values and morals.I know there as no hip hop or saggy pants when Cain killed Able.But lets blame hip hop anyway.My job as a mother is to raise my kids and teach them Right from wrong.I do not think that anyone on T.V., on videos or anyone else is suppose to teach my sons how to be men or my girls how to be women thats what me and their father are for.I get so tired of lazy parents blaming music and games and t.v. for ad kids.Where was all this stuff before t.v.? i don't think the mob got it's start from hip hop.I never read in the bible where Cain killed Able his brother after they played a little Play station.Bottom line if parents slow down stop worrying about getting to Star Bucks,or lunch with friends or just plain passing the buck and start getting back to the basics they won't have to worry about how their kids come up.I say this parents need to tune in and try spending real time with their kids and let their actions make their children want to follow in their foot steps,let parents be their children's hero's not rappers,singers,and T.V. stars. they are just doing their jobs like parents need to do theirs.Telling kids that a suit means your safe is a lie,if I'm not mistaken some people in suits have molested children and have stolen money from companies and their are quite a few me in suits with the most important jobs i know and they start wars at the drop of dime so lets stop trying to convince ourselves that clothes dictate character.No you are who you are.And if we can't take the time to get to know someone before we pass judgment then all we are saying it's OK to judge people on appearance with that way of thinking we just said prejudice is OK
 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
January 28, 2008, 8:52 pm PST

Pants hangin low....what a short memory

 My teenage years were in the 50's....what did we wear? Levies hangin real low! with pointed shoes and greasy hair...short sleve shirts with the sleves rolled up and collar turned up. Did our parents like it?
Hell no...and you could get kicked out of school foe those low slung pants. Hey...although this baggy attire started in the black community...it has spread everywhere...ALL generations make their sartorial statements....just wait till the old age homes are filled with the tatooed and pierced generation with orange and purple hair...man, that ain't gonna be pretty....get over it ...if these baggy pants guys want a job....they will find their size.
 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
frustrated
January 28, 2008, 8:56 pm PST

baggy pants

My boys used to wear baggie pant when they were younger. Now they are out of the phase. It is like very generation. What was bad then is now good. In 1970 boys wore long hair. Then that left. Just chill, something will come along next.
 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
January 28, 2008, 8:58 pm PST

01/28 The Baggy Pants Debate

I'm convinced that Al Sharpton is a racist. A racist against white people. All that man ever says is "well if it was a white person then it wouldn't be the same".....he says that crap about every subject. And honestly I thnk it's ridiculous that Dr. Phil keeps asking for his input, which is pointless cause you'll get the same answer every time. I think he brought up some valid points about making it a law and whatnot, but as far as that...I have no respect for him. None.

I have a brother who is into skateboarding, who does NOT listen to or has any interest  towards the hip hop community and he wears baggy pants. I think it's something that is so common that it's normal anymore. When you stop and think about it, it's pretty ridiculous. I mean sagging a little bit doesn't bother me, but when your pants are hanging a lot bit above the knee, that's just plain stupid. Come on...

As far as making it a law, as long you don't see the bare ass cheeks, then what's the big deal? I support the whole trying to make it uncool thing, and trying to set new examples, but it's against American rights to make it illegal.
 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
January 28, 2008, 8:59 pm PST

Rev. Sharpton always stirs up racism!

Quote From: momof476

I am a mother of 4 & although I don't like the baggy pants, I also don't like the low cut shirts that women wear to show their breast off. Or the skirts women wear that are so short that if they bend over it shows everything under it. I don't like it but I don't think there should be a law against it. Back when I was a teen tight jeans were the style. Style changes so much. This isn't a race issue at all. I know just as many white guys that wear them as black. I really wish Rev. Al Sharpton would quit turning every little issue into a race issue. That is the problem with society today. Not everything is about race. People are all human, period.

I agree!  Rev. Sharpton turns everything into a race debate and the "baggy-saggy pants" is not even a racial topic, it's a clothing style topic.  Dr. Phil needs to ban him from the show because he is clearly a racist, and sometimes even against his own people.  I think his initial intentions were good to protect people from unfair prejudices and practices, but it has bittered him to the point that he plays the race card into every debated issue.  This topic was not about race, it was about placing a ban on wearing a certain style of clothing, and the reasoning being the ban was so that weapons could not be hidden in over-sized clothing. Just because your wearing baggy pants doesn't make you a thug or a criminal...just a BAD DRESSER!  Banning the clothing is NOT the answer either.  The government should not ban attire.

 

So the way I see it is, Rev. Sharpton is "labeling" black people as thugs and that is so very, very wrong! People of all races, backgrounds and colors are wearing these clothes because that's just the style and the cool thing to do.  Should we have banned hip huggers in the 70's because of navels showing or Hot Pants, because legs were showing?  NO!  Styles change, this one has gone on way to long. Find something else to look cool in, I say lets bring back the ZOOT SUIT!  Now that style of baggy pants was classy and I love a man in a suit!  It would be so cool to see our young men wearing suits again, instead of having their boxers show as a fashion statement.  I remember we tried bringing the zoot suit back in the 70's, but it didn't last very long.  However, they are still available and on the racks at the Men's Warehouse in L.A.

 

History of this trend dates back to 1943, when after a three month long trial dubbed the "Sleepy Lagoon" trial Mexican American youths were beat up and stripped of their draped jackets and pegged pants in riots that went on from May to June 1943.  Well in August of 1942, the police lined up outside of dance halls, armed with pokers to which sharp razor blades were attached, and they ripped the peg-top trousers and "zoot suits" of the boys as they came out.  These crimes committed by law enforcement went unpunished and the L.A. Press started the crime wave by making up stories about "Mexican zoot suit gangsters".  The Los Angeles newspapers actually started the riot by giving zoot suiters bad press, and they should have also been held accountable for their actions. Go figure!

 

  • The Los Angeles City Council banned zoot suits within the city.

 

This ban was wrong!  The clothes didn't cause the riot, prejudice, bad press and law enforcement did.  Then the city then added insult to injury by banning the suits!  They should have banned racism instead!  

 

California's Governor at the time, Earl Warren, formed a committee to investigate the causes of the "Zoot Suit" riots. An excerpt from his report says it best:

  • Any American citizen suspected of crime is entitled to be treated as an individual, to be indicted as such, and to be tried, both at law and in the forum of public opinion, on his merits or errors, regardless of race, color, creed, or the kind of clothes he wears.

The entire article can be read here: http://www.digitalhistory.uh.edu/mexican_voices/voices_display.cfm?id=104  The Zoot Suit Riots May and June 1943

 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
January 28, 2008, 9:02 pm PST

The Baggy Pants Debate

I watched the show today, and I believe everyone missed the point.  Baggy pants are not the issue, but rather baggy pants worn half way down the legs with the underwear exposed to public view is the issue. Baggy pants are not an ethnic, racial, or gender thing, as your guests seemed to feel so strongly about and claim.  I do not believe that the government should dictate what we wear, but rather we should use common sense and good judgement to present ourselves in the best light, by what we wear in public.  Almost all cities in this country have laws on the books regarding INDECENT EXPOSURE, which I feel is the real definition of baggy pants worn half way down the legs with the underwear exposed to public view.  By themselves, baggy pants are not offensive, as long as they are worn up around the waist, where they belong !!
 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
January 28, 2008, 9:02 pm PST

01/28 The Baggy Pants Debate

Quote From: fenrir

I grew up and currently live in a very multicultural neighbourhood. I do not see a huge issue regarding race and this 'baggy pant debate'. Young men from all of the racial groups wear these types of pant. I myself don't personally have a problem these pants. I believe that, in time, the fad will end and young men will find other ways to express certain statements.  

 

For me, personally, the issue is not so much about the baggy pants and the question of 'how low is too low?'. I find the idea of the government banning certain types of clothing the more ominous situation. If the government passes laws that say what a person can and cannot wear, there is great potential for abuse of these powers. If it is baggy pants one day, what is next? Where will the line be drawn between what people can wear and what the government decides we cannot wear? While watching the show I found myself wondering, "Is the government being given too much power? Are these the rumblings of a people striding toward an Orwellian society?"  

 

If you've read '1984' by George Orwell you know the consequences of limiting an individual's ability to express him of herself is the eventual degredation of free will and free thought.

 

Of course, I could just be being a tad bit pessimistic and misanthropic. Still, food for thought.

I think that's an intelligent thought.  The gov has always abused it's power. The government even goes out of it's way to make sure people who have invented/discovered other resourceful ways to run our vehicles on things other than oil, are basically killed. They recieve major payoffs from oil companies to make sure that stuff doesn't get out in the public.
 
First | Prev | 84 | 85 | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 | 90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | Next | Last