Topic : 01/28 The Baggy Pants Debate

    They are rediculous?  Come on, that's a pretty immature statement for a thirty six year old to make.  For all you know they could be completly kind, rational, intellectual, and sensible people in those pants. You can't just judge them on the premace of what they wear. [I know a lot of people do, but, hey, I'm sure you are smarter than that. =D.]

    Listen, I don't enjoy the baggy pants fad, but I respect an individual's right to wear them. The government is gradually stripping us of our liberties, and, no offense, but it's people like you- who want govermental officials to step in and forbid people to do things that they should be free to do- that allow that to happen. If we aren't carefull, America could turn to a communist society, and the next thing you know, people aren't going to be allowed to wear shirts with crosses because people are offened by them, anyhing involving a racial remark, or a "politically incorect thought" will be eliminatedand all in all the United States, a place where life, liberty, and the persuit of happiness is upposed to be granted to every man, and woman in the nation, is going to come with it's on dress code- and, mister, in a society like that, clothing articles would be the least of our problems. =_=;.

    We have no right to tell other human beigs what they can and can' wear in the same way as we cant force them to feel as we feel or express themselves in th way we want them to.  If a peson wants to wear a certain article of cloathing, let them wear it, man! =P. It's not like they are hurting anyone. The bottom line is, though we may not all like the way it looks on others, or ourselves, what someone wears is the individual's decision, and the rest of us should just deal with it. So long as no one is doing, or selling drugs, robbing banks, vadalising property, or hurting anyone physically, we should just let them be. By learning to understand and respect even the smallest differences between one another, we are closer to acheiving the eternal dream of peace. :3.  

>>>>>And, for God's sake, sir, you can just go one size larger, and purchas a belt, or just shop online. [The internet is magical that way. ;D.] The world isn't going to implode if a store runs out of size 36 pants. xD.

                                                                                                                                                                  You're buddy,

                                                                                                                                                                            Liennin.

[I am well aware, also, of the fact that my last sentence ruined the overall appeal of my comment. x_x;.]

I do not think it is fair for there to be a law against baggy pants.  I agree that no on wants to see someones undergarments, but if it's not ok for guys to sag then why is it ok for women and young girls to walk around with low cut tops on showing way too much cleavage, short shorts with their butts hangin out of the bottom of them?  If it is not ok for men then it should not be ok for women.  Also the ying yang twins have some of the most disgusting lyrics, for example, the "whisper" song, if they want to be romodels for some of these young kids they should start by changing their some of their lyric choices.

They never pointed out that on beaches they regulate how much skin is showing for women's swimsuits. 

I think this is relevant because like the one kid pointed out on the show they don't care, that is why they show the world their behind, and that is why we judge them, and that is why people that do this are helping to promote the racial divide.  It is about decency not race, I'm glad the Texas mayor is black to deflate the issue, baggy pants should be banned and no apology should have been given to the gay community.  I find their immorality offensive too.