Topic : 02/22 Hell Weddings

Number of Replies: 244
New Messages This Week: 0
Last Reply On:
Created on : Thursday, February 14, 2008, 03:54:15 pm
Author : DrPhilBoard1
Every bride wants to shine on her special day -- from wearing the perfect gown to hosting the most extravagant reception. But what happens when the dream of the perfect wedding turns into a nightmare? Janae knows about this pain firsthand. Her husband, Michael, got so drunk before the ceremony that he passed out cold after saying “I do” and didn’t wake up until the next day!  Janae attended the reception by herself and spent her wedding night with her bridesmaids at a hotel. Their wedding from hell took place two years ago, but she still tears up at the memory of that fateful day. Can she ever forgive Michael's mishaps, or is he doomed to the doghouse forever? Then, Angela is a self-professed bridezilla who makes no excuses for her demanding ways. She even created a newsletter for her bridesmaids with the rules and regulations they must follow to participate in her wedding! Her sister and maid of honor, Vanessa, worries that Angela's nitpicking will cause her fiancé, Marvin, to run for the hills. What's behind Angela's controlling behavior, and is she headed for heartache on her special day? Share your thoughts here.

Find out what happened on the show.


User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
February 25, 2008, 12:06 pm PST

02/22 Hell Weddings

Quote From: poohbear18

I think that Janae just wanted a free ride/wedding cause the 1st one was up to her standards.  Yeah he got drunk he was probably nerveous......still no excuse......but hey life goes on get over it.....Dr. Phil has a very BIG heart to give you another wedding.......why didn't  Janae do it if so not liking the 1st one?  I think she just wanted something to Lord over Michael to get her way..........as for Angie she is a lost cause for the wedding......yeah sure it is her big day.......but to go into debt before they have even gotten married????  Sorry but that is stupid.

 

When my husband and I got married in 1991 we hadn't even set a date yet.  He was in the USAF and they were getting ready to send him to Saudia Arbia.....then I got notice that new managers had taken over the apt I lived in and they were upgrading it to where I couldn't afford it...........so  My hubby and I went to Reno, Nev to get married........No friends, no family except for my brother and his wife as witnesses, and that was it.  Not the wedding we had planned but that is the way it worked out........we have been married now almost 17-years and not a day goes by that we regrate not getting married in a BIG FANCY wedding......

 

So I guess what I'm trying to say is..........It dosn't matter how big your wedding is.......the only thing that matters is that you love the person that you are with. 

I agree with you.  I don't think that anyone who felt Janae needs to just "get over it" is saying that Michael was right for getting so plastered that he was passing out at the alter!   And I heard someone else also say that it was probably from "nervousness on his weeding day that he made this mistake"  and I agree with that statement too.   I seem to recall my mother *insisting on me & my girlfriends eating on my wedding day for fear of a "glass or 2 going straight to your head" and she was right!   It hadn't occured to me to eat because it wasn't just nervousness but excitement that I was going to walk down the isle etc.  And being with my girlfriends as we dressed we did have a glass of wine as they toasted me privately prior to all the whopppola starting with everyone else.  I can see how that could get carried away if there wasn't someone really on top of things.   AGain I don't think he was right either but it's those who do NOT drink often that tend to get drunk on much less that much quicker.  Hubby & I are anything but drinkers & so 1 shot or 2 shots of something could impair our judgement to the point of yes making the HUGH mistake that Michael did.  Well actually I'd never "do a shot".  but this is why we are NOT drinkers.  :)  but on a wedding day the idea of *A* drink I could see it happening & turning into something else.  And I disagree that this guy did this with "indifference to his bride or as a show of disrespect"  I don't believe there was any thought there at all not even as far as there was any malace in it thinking "aww to hell with her".  I think he was excited/nervous had *A* drink & then he wasn't using any judgement.  Stupid yes malace & indifference NO!  This was not something he did "to her" And like you said I think she was just ticked off that her wedding wasn't to her standard and she wanted another big new shiney wedding.  If she really was THAT upset & felt he'd done this "to her" then she shouldn't be with him!  But suddenly another wedding is going to change all that?  And boy those no show tears that she was dabing from her face stopped the moment Dr. Phil made the offer for the "best country club party".   And as far as the friends and his father could you imagine what the lovely blushing bride would have said if the father had said "hey he can't get married he's 3 sheets to the wind here"!   She'd have had a fit that he'd "left me at the alter.  WAAAAAAAAA"    Of course just because I can *see how it happened* does not mean I condone what he did.  I too would have been REALLY PO'D but I wouldn't be holding it over him to just get some STUFF from him. 

 

 And when I hear people say they would have been out of there & "ran for the hills" to me this means they wouldn't be right for their spouse anyway.  I could not imagine "running for the hills" from my husband.   Loving him & *respecting HIM* I wouldn't run just because of a stupid mistake.  It would be different if there were other things of disrespect or if he'd had a drinking problem but I agree with you I think this was just something to hold over the guys head for 2 years now & to get "STUFF" with. 

 

Life is not perfect and she is not a child to be pouting & having a hissy fit until someone sticks a much larger better candy stick in her mouth to make her pout turn to a smile.  If she was really upset & emotionally distraught then Dr. Phil suddenly saying "We'll help you with a brand new wedding" isn't something that would help either.   And if it was something where she thought she had a need to take vows with him again to "recreate the moment" she would have just wanted a subdued ceremony etc.  That is a REAL simbole of them uniting etc.  The wedding is just a uniting of 2 people & them wanting to share it with friends & loved ones.   If a woman is still confused about the fantasy thing they gew up on they are to IMMATURE for marriage.  IMO   As a grown up we see what reality is & understand that fantasy & fairy tales are just that & not reall. 

 

I can't believe there are so many that actually back this woman up on her emotional blackmail of this poor man who has seeminly been trying to make it up to her for 2 years. now?!   If he hasn't been able to make it up to her in that time for her to be able to forgive him Then she should have let him go because he shouldn't have to have a life sentnce for a stupid mistake.  I'm sure she was "humiliated" but this was HIS DAY TOO!  People seem to forget this & he had already been punished enough by missing the day & knowing he was responsible for the day not being what *THEY had dreamed*.  Men don't dream of their day from the time they're little, but when they propose & the plans are being maid they are anticipating a day where they're going to have a beautiful bride who's in love and happy with them.   So their day wasn't right & the last 2 years have been miserable & he's been punished ever since?  Seems harsh to me.  If she was that upset she should have let him go. 

 

And this post is too long to even comment on the other couple except to say I hope that guy ran as fast as he could from this controlling wacko!   3 kids & she wasn't a big expensive wedding?  ridiculas!

 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
February 25, 2008, 12:23 pm PST

02/22 Hell Weddings

Quote From: coachjoeh

If you have read my post about how it doesn't matter how you are married, just that you are, you know I don't think It's important how big and beautiful the wedding is.  But in your post you are making comparisons that just don't make sense.  I am sorry that your husband lost a child (I have three and never want to live through losing one), sorry that you were in a car wreck, sorry about your physical problems and those your husband has, and know how hard it is to live on limited income (I've been doing it for years).  But all of those things are parts of life you could not control.  The groom here could have controlled how much he drank that day, but didn't.  He drank with his friends without any concern as to how it would affect his wife to be and their wedding day.  Again, in my post you will read that when my wife and I got married we were "feeling good".  But we both chose to have a few drinks and neither of us passed out and missed the reception.  He made a bad, selfish choice.  She has every right to be upset. 

see that's where you're confused though because when you say "He drank with his friends without any concern as to how it would affect his wife to be and their wedding day."  That is true he wasn't concerned because he wasn't *thinking* & people who make a mistake are often not using their heads!   When she would speak of how humiliated she was she kept saying "I couldn't believe he'd do this *to me*" and she took it as though he'd done this with *indifference to her* & that is not the way it sounded & if it was the way it was why would he be so remorseful?   People who are indifferent or who "don't care or are "unconcerned for the persons feelings" don't have remorse! 

 

 

Was it a stupid thing he did?  Yes it was but those "few drinks" you & yours had that had you "feeling good" would put *me under the table* & after the 1st 2 "few drinks" I wouldn't be using my head either & THAT is how this young man got into trouble! 

 

If she felt he was so indifferent to her to be "unconcerned for her feelings" or that he was cold & indifferent she should not have continued to be married to him period.  If she felt she was "so emotionally upset that she could not forgive him" she should have let him go!   To *punish your husband* the one you say you love for 2 years is outragious.  And the idea that she pulls this out every time she wants something that is a expensive material thing shouts this isn't about her being "upset" any more at all but being a pouty selfish brat.  

 

And this person you're addressing commenting on the REAL issues of life makes PERFECT sense!  If this woman does not have the emotional intelligence to get beyond a *wedding day that wasn't purfect* she will not EVER be able to handle the REAL crap that life hands them individually or as a couple.  This person went on to list the things that had happened in her life that were a REAL emotional trauma & those are the things to be really emotionally distraught over not because your husband had too much to drink ONE day that impaired his judgement to allow him to continue to make an even BIGGER mistake!    He MADE A MISTAKE!   Now if he'd gotten in a car & killed someone this "mistake" would be a horse of a different color but this man did not kill or mame someone.  If your spouse make a mistake that was upsetting would you punish her for 2 years whill using emotional blackmail to get "STUFF"?  The emotionall pain that he had caused her was not intentional or something he realized was going to happen because he was "impaired" but her inability to forgive him & her punishment of him all this time is something she KNOWS is hurting him & she IS INDIFFERENT to him.

 

She just wanted a country club wedding out of this because the house & the SUV wasn't enough.....  

 
User Mood
Mellow

Message Emote
blank
February 25, 2008, 12:40 pm PST

02/22 Hell Weddings

Quote From: jewelsf

You didn't understand? Well, that explains why you are one of the few who agree that she needed another wedding. My point was that this woman will never be able to handle EMOTIONAL problems. The comparisons in my quote were to show that bad things happen in life and you had better be able to deal with them. A wedding day is not one of them. How about we agree to just disagree? I do agree that the groom acted foolishly but it truly is what happens during the marriage that counts. Using his bad behavior to get a house, suv, etc. was wrong on her part too. She's immature and needs to grow up or their marriage will be a rocky one. jewelsf
You're right. Janae is not only immature. She's manipulative. And, not only of Michael, but also of Dr phil. I wonder, now that she's played Dr Phil into giving her another wedding, if she'll continure playing Michael into giving her things.
 
User Mood
Mellow

Message Emote
blank
February 25, 2008, 1:02 pm PST

she had the right to be upset, but.....

Quote From: coachjoeh

If you have read my post about how it doesn't matter how you are married, just that you are, you know I don't think It's important how big and beautiful the wedding is.  But in your post you are making comparisons that just don't make sense.  I am sorry that your husband lost a child (I have three and never want to live through losing one), sorry that you were in a car wreck, sorry about your physical problems and those your husband has, and know how hard it is to live on limited income (I've been doing it for years).  But all of those things are parts of life you could not control.  The groom here could have controlled how much he drank that day, but didn't.  He drank with his friends without any concern as to how it would affect his wife to be and their wedding day.  Again, in my post you will read that when my wife and I got married we were "feeling good".  But we both chose to have a few drinks and neither of us passed out and missed the reception.  He made a bad, selfish choice.  She has every right to be upset. 
Yes, she had the right to be upset that he made a very foolish choice that day.  But,  this does not entitle her to a lifetime of pampering and having all her (expensive) demands fulfilled.  She also needs to look at the big picture.  Is he a good husband?  Did he make the one stupid mistake but is otherwise a wonderful guy?  Did he learn from his mistake (I think he did) and reassure her that it won't be repeated?  (I think he did that too)  At some point he will get sick and tired of her unreasonable demands and hit the road...my own patience would have run out long ago.  I am with those who think she should not have been rewarded with that second wedding.
 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
February 25, 2008, 3:18 pm PST

02/22 Hell Weddings

Quote From: ramair

You're right. Janae is not only immature. She's manipulative. And, not only of Michael, but also of Dr phil. I wonder, now that she's played Dr Phil into giving her another wedding, if she'll continure playing Michael into giving her things.

Sure she will because it wasn't "Michael" that was able to "give her her day back" but Dr. Phil  and once she's had the "day to shine" she go back to complaining that the original day Michael got drunken, passed out and was not there for their wedding night.  This will be something she will milk for the rest of their lives..........    

 

One would think she'd stop at this point realizing that this man may get sick o f all this childishness & may say "hey wait if I was drunk while I signed that paper maybe that means it's not a binding contract" & split completely on her!   Who the heck could blame him at this point.  I wonder if they're going to go through the whole thing of making it legal with the 2nd wedding?   It isn't the "story book" ceremony that makes it legal but the contract you're suppose to be sober signing.  Maybe he'll wake up before he signs another?

 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
February 25, 2008, 3:57 pm PST

02/22 Hell Weddings

Quote From: robin457

weddings aren't silly. it is the people who enter into the marriage that are silly. when they enter into a marriage they should be aware of who they are going to be living with. what kind of person is this.

if my husband had shown up drunk for the wedding, their wouldn't have been one. I don't care if the pope is sitting in the audience. to have no respect for the feelings of his future wife. Well, let's just say that dad should have left him where he laid. and then go tell the bride and let her chose to have him swerving on stage or leave him in the yard. which, i would have left him in the yard. he knew what he was doing. he didn't care how it looked. and its not the wedding planning and all the glitter that makes us march down the isle. we go down the isle to show that we are together, for better or worse, sickness and in health, till death us part. not show up drunk and pay for it for the next fifty years.

marriage is hard enough without both parties putting in it together. but to begin your marriage incapable of standing up because you are sloshed to the gills is reprehensible.

No it isn't the rational getting married & celebrating joining together that are "silly"

 

But I take issue with you assesment of marriage.  I don't know about YOU but in reality I was already joined with my husband prior to marriage & was there for "better or worse" & that would include him having made A MISTAKE!   It would have been SO easy for me to be that intoxicated at my wedding because simply I cannot hold my alcohol!  Yet the idea of a drink to celebrate when you just don't realize how it is going to effect you to me is a reasonable mistake!  I don't even BELIEVE that this man did this with indifference to his wife's feeling!   It would be VERY easy on a wedding day to not eat enough & then have a glass or 2 in clebrating with your friends prior to the ceremoney & have that snow ball.  And if it is other wise then that is a whole different animal!   No new wedding would fix that! 

 

 

It wouldn't be who's "in the audience" that would have me marry or not marry and so the idea of her having married because of the audience means she didn't marry because she wanted to be married to HIM.  "I would have left him in the yard".  I would not EVER walk away from my husband because of a mistake!  If this was his "history" then I wouldn't be there at the wedding to start but if it is not a history &/or he's normally a loving & respectful person then this is a MISTAKE & if my husband was drunk beyond imagination I'd be WORRIED about someone I LOVE I wouldn't be at a wedding whining he's not there!!!!!! 

 

I believe it was another post you said that "most women grow up believing they're going to have a story book wedding"  Well that may have been the reason you married but it wasn't for me!  Did I feel like a "princess"?  yes I did but that's because I loved and admired my husband so much I was tickled giddy to become his wife.  The dress, flowers, church & sharing it with friends was all icing on the cake!   And still it didn't go "perfect" & I knew it was no "story book wedding"  because it was REAL & therefore it was BETTER than any FAIRY TALE I ever read as a child!  That was not because of the wedding that was because of the MAN I married!   If a *grown womany* is still having a FANTASY of a story book wedding without any reasoning of reality she's too immature to get married!!!!!!    We all believed in Santa as kids too but we know better now don't we? 

 

If she felt this man went drinking because he "just didn't care about her" then that means she doesn't really believe he cares for or about her & no new wedding is going to change that! 

 

You're right we SHOULD know this person who we are marrying & so if your husband showed up drunk for your wedding you'd *suddenly* be so angry you wouldn't marry him?   So that means that if he said "Hey honey I don't know what I was thinking.  I'm not use to drinking & we all thought a shot would just loosen us up cause I was real nervous & then before I knew it I'd had 3  because the 1st shot had me impaired & I'm really so sorry because I would never have done anything to hurt you."   If your husband The husband YOU KNOW said that are you saying you'd "not have married him" ?  When I look at my husband "the man I know" I can't imagine any mistake that he'd make that could have made me so angry with him that I would have not married him. 

 

 

"he knew what he was doing & didn't care how it LOOKED"   While I would have been angry with my husband it would NOT have been because he did it knowing the "way it would look"?  Why gives a whoie how it LOOKS?  I really don't care if the Pope is sitting there & if he thinks hubby is the devil in diguise!  It's what I THINK & how I feel that is important & the idea that hubby had too many drinks because he was acting like a foolish *ss on his wedding day isn't something that would make me suddenly not love him!  Whe we married "for better or worse" that is in the face of our spouse making mistakes too.  & those mistakes are often hard to take!!!!!!!!!!!  That's why we take the vows!!!

 

And so you're there for "better or worse, sickness & in health till death do you part" unless your husband makes a mistake that makes you feel like you've got egg on your face?   I'd wear whatever egg I needed to for my husband.  No matter what mistake he's ever made it's the rest of the things that he says that says what he really things of me & that he does that says he does in deed care & LOVES me.  No mistake could change who he really is, I know him now & knew him then & if he was intoxicated on a wedding day PO'd or not I'd still love him & would have been CONCERNED about him!   I would have been worried he'd had alcholo poising!  Not "leaving him on the lawn"! 

 

 

And if she was that upset for the reasons you've said a new country club wedding would not change any of this...... 

 
User Mood
Lazy

Message Emote
blank
February 25, 2008, 7:44 pm PST

Another Wedding

I disagreed with Dr. Phil giving them another wedding paid for.  But it's his money.
 
User Mood
Good

Message Emote
blank
February 26, 2008, 7:18 am PST

Did the First One Count?

Quote From: capri69

I disagreed with Dr. Phil giving them another wedding paid for.  But it's his money.
I think that whether or not Dr. Phil gave them another wedding they should have another ceremony.  One in which the bride AND the groom attend.  He was not in any condition to drive a car let alone make a lifelong commitment to another person.

If it was my husband I would always wonder why he needed to get s@#$tfaced to marry me.  Did he want to commit or not?  Come to the party sober this time big boy. 

Oh yeah and.... Serve sparkling grape juice.
 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
February 26, 2008, 12:07 pm PST

give me a break

if this lady was so torn up about the 'hell' wedding she had 2 YEARS AGO, then she has bigger issues!! let it go, just be glad her hubby is well and with her, sure be mad for a little while but get over it!!! yeah that was a dumb thing to do but i just don't have any sympathy you just want to grab her and yell 'get over it, little crybaby!!!'
 
User Mood
Mellow

Message Emote
blank
February 28, 2008, 4:36 pm PST

02/22 Hell Weddings

Quote From: douhearme

I agree.  As a woman I was both appalled and pi**ed off after watching that segment.   I couldn't believe the way she constantly emasculates this man.  There's a difference between having the wedding of your dreams and being a complete jerk.  She says she loves him, but she totally ignores his feelings about EVERYTHING. She went WAY over budget for the wedding; she mocked the way he looked in the tux; she embarrased him when he tried to propose.    Why in the h#ll is she even marrying this man?  This isn't love, this is the first signs of spousal abuse.  She already has two children.  And she's treating Marvin like he's one. 

 

Angela talks about being organized.  That's not organization--it's control in the worst possible way.  It's a defense mechanism to keep from being hurt.  Meanwhile she's hurting everybody around her.  Her assertion that she's "better" than she used to be simply means she's just a b*tch and not a super b*tch now.  Wow, what an improvement. 

 

I'd never marry this woman without months of counseling.  It that doesn't work, I'd tell Marvin to take care of his child and then find a woman who will respect him; love him; and work WITH him.    

 I can't see, for the life of me, why Marvin would want to marry Angela. But I have a pretty good idea why she  wants to marry him. For the benefits, I'll bet.
 

First | Prev | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | Next | Last