Topic : Ban Judicial Immunity

Number of Replies: 1
New Messages This Week: 0
Last Reply On:
Created on : Friday, April 11, 2008, 12:52:19 pm
Author : haroldbk

U. S. District Court and 9th Circuit Court of Appeal Judges disobey their judicial
oath, violate the constitutional right of pro se (self represented) litigants, and
then hide under their self-knitted judicial immunity blanket.  Worse yet that fail
to take responsibility for the malicious actions and disobey Canon Rules of Judicial
Conduct 1, 2A, 3,and 3B(3), their Judicial Oath, Article 3 Section 1m etc.  These
Judges nor the Courts do not show remorse, nor are they apologitic.

I currently have 2 pending lawsuits, that I am the Pro Se (self represented) Plaintiff
in, against U. S. District Court Judges Philip Pro, Kent Dawson, Chief Judge Roger
Hunt, 9th Circuit Court Judge Otto R. Skopil Jr., Robert Boochever, Edward Leavy,
William Canby, Atsushi Tashima, Susan Graber, and Chief Judge Mary Schroeder.  The
case numbers are 2:07-cv-01325-TL and 2:07-cv-01432-RCJ.  While both cases were
initially filed in the U. S. District Court - District of Southern Nevada, the 01325
case has been transferred to U. S. District Court Judge Tim Leonard (Oklahoma).
I have about 700 pages of proof, including the Court Task Force Reports showing
how Federal Judges discriminate against Pro Se litigants.  Mine is not an isolated
incident, more of a common occurrence.

On October 15, 2007, at about 8:35 a.m., I filed a complaint with the F.B.I. against
the Judges named in th 01325 case and on November 9, 2007, at about 8:35 a.m. I
filed another complaint with the F.B.I. regarding the Judges in the 01432 case.
Both complaints deal with judicial corruption, discrimination, white collar crimes,
bait and switch, etc.  You see the courts baited me in with "justice for all"
and "the scales of justice are balance, but when I paid the court filing fees,
the court switched it to justice is not for poor pro se plaintiff.

The named Judges are being represented by the U. S. Attorney's office.  The
same agency that on the USDOJ website mission statements says that they are there
to protect victims.  So much for truth, justice and the American way.

Each and every time Judges discriminate, they commit treason.

I did file the proper judicial complaints against said Judges, with the 9th Circuit
Judicial Commission, and just like the Task Force Report and similar report, Judges
look the other way when other Judges violate Canons, their Judicial Oath, etc.

I even contacted all the U. S. Senate and House of Representative members of the
Judiciary Committee, explaining to them what I and others have and continue to go
through.  When I asked to have a meeting, I was told by the few who responded that
I, alone, could not meet with them, however if I contacted celebrities, and had
them speak then it would be okay.  Like I have celebrities phone numbers.

I now suffer from Legal Abuse Syndrome.  I am not looking for publicity for myself.
The issue and problem of Judges who discriminate and retaliate is what takes center
stage.  Until such problem is stopped, there will never be justice for all, and
the scales of justice will never be balanced.

It has now been over 5 months, and to date Defendants have yet to answer (admit
or deny) the lawsuits that I filed.  Delay of Justice equates to denial of justice.

Help me get Judicial Immunity banned.




User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
chillin'
June 19, 2008, 10:33 am PDT

Justice Kennedy....

"On June 12, 2008, Justice Kennedy wrote the opinion for the 5-4 majority holding that the prisoners had a right to the habeas corpus under the United States Constitution and that the MCA was an unconstitutional suspension of that right.

 

Boumediene v. Bush, 553 U.S. ___ (2008), was a writ of habeas corpus submission made in a civilian court of the United States on behalf of Lakhdar Boumediene, a naturalized citizen of Bosnia and Herzegovina, currently being held in military detention by the United States at the Guantanamo Bay detention camps."

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boumediene_v._Bush

 

To restate this point, Kennedy ruled that prisoners of war at Gitmo resort & spa be entitled to our court system.  This is a HORRIBLE idea!!  This is the same US court system that acquitted OJ.

 

From the US Constitution, Article 1 Section 9: "The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it."

It's a privilege (granted by the State), not a basic human right (which are granted by God, not the State).

It may be suspended during times of war (we were invaded by Muslim terrorists, and we're now in a war as properly declared by Congress) to protect the public safety; not from Americans, but from foreign terrorists.

"Article III

Section 1. The judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The judges, both of the supreme and inferior courts, shall hold their offices during good behaviour, and shall, at stated times, receive for their services, a compensation, which shall not be diminished during their continuance in office. "

Impeachment by the House and Trial by the Senate is the correct response to this outrageous decision by Kennedy.

 

If America (and its Supreme Court Justices) had, 65 years ago, the mindset they have now, we would have lost World War II. The enemy that isn't killed during the fighting is taken prisoner. He is held until the end of the war, and then released under the terms of the surrender treaty. We had thousands of German and Japanese prisoners during World War II; they were not each granted trials, and we certainly didn't have enough lawyers for the task if we had. (Of course we have more than enough now!)

 

First Page | Previous Page | 1 | Next Page | Last Page