Quote From: renophilYou made some interesting and well thought out points. Unfortunately your points are nothing new and seem to be right out of the 1964 Feminist Handbook. Never the less I shall address them and offer you and other women some food for thought.
First off let me remind you that I do not have any animosity toward older women. But do not confuse a lack of animosity with sexual desire. Older women are not as beautiful as younger women. This is not only my opinion, but the opinion of the vast majority of Men & WOMEN in western culture. Let me ask you all to find an ad for any cosmetic that espouses its ability to make a woman look older, smarter and more experienced. You will not find such an advertisement anywhere, for by and large women do not want to look older, smarter or more experienced, for society does not value O.F.F. (OLD FAT or FLAT) women. (And to be fair "FLAT" is open to interoperation, and usually refers to firmness and perkiness.) Why is it an insult to be honest? This is not to say that O.F.F. women are shunned by society or me for that matter. Older women are valued for their experiences and knowledge. But face facts ladies, society places much more value on a woman's ability to REPRODUCE then it does on her life experiences. And like it or not nature made pregnancy and giving birth a young woman's pursuit. It is physically taxing and age does not combine very well with what is regarded as a woman's most important role in civilization. Oh yes medical advances have made having babies possible for more and more older women. But medical science does not dictate what is beautiful. Our animal instincts do that.
Yes I want women to fulfill my sexual desires! What on earth is so bloody wrong with that? When I look at a young hot chick in a Bikini, my first instinct is NOT to determine if she knows anything about quantum physics. No my first instinct is to wonder how she would perform in my bedroom and how she would look Without that bikini! Furthermore a young hot chick in a Bikini is NOT trying to be appreciated for her mind! She puts on a Bikini to be sexy and attract attention to herself.
Which brings me to treating women as mere objects: I would like to paint a picture in your minds for a moment. Picture a lovely young women in a bikini laying on the beach on a nice sunny day. Then picture two Men 20 feet from this young woman watching her. One is handsome and rich, the other is ugly and poor. The rich and handsome Man would be regarded as showing interest. While at the same time the poor and ugly Man would be a sexist jerk who was only regarding this poor woman as nothing more then a piece of meet. Have any of you women ever noticed this double standard? I often hear that women do not like being treated as objects and despise being objectified. Well it has been my experience that the difference between flirtation and objectification is about $200,000 a year in gross income. The fact of the matter is women LOVE TO BE OBJECTIFIED. What women hate is being objectified by the wrong person. Thus as a Man, playing the game according to the rules you chicks have laid down, it is in my bests interests to granted permission to treat woman like an object. So why is this bad? It sure works well for me!
No, 27 is not to old for me. But, are you hot? THAT is the question of key importance. And after reading your well worded and well thought out rebuttal to my first posting, I suspect that you are not hot. Beauty and intelligence so rarely go hand in hand. Generally my cut off age is 30, but in all fairness I do judge 31 and 32 year olds on the individual basis.
You asked me several questions... "What's going to happen to the 25 y/o you're with now when she reaches 'the cut off age?'" That depends on her and she knows it! She has to keep my interest if she wants to keep me. She has told me that being open and honest with her are two of the most important things to her as a woman. And I give her what she wants by being open and totally honest with her about what I want and think. And she knows full well that a woman who does not stimulate me below the waist cannot possibly stimulate me above the waist. "Are you going to dump her for someone younger?" You betcha! Women are like cars. It is best to replace them every few years and get younger models. " How do you think it will make her feel" I am not sure? I have not given t much thought, for it is not important for me to think about her feelings. I am and always will be the most important person in my life and my success and happiness takes precedent over everything else. My would be girlfriend know this and respects me for my confidence. You do remember Men having confidence don't you?
You called me a mail chauvinist in your posting. That used to mean something. But in 2008 'Mail Chauvinist' is thrown around so much it means nothing anymore. If woman make a case for the sky not being blue and when a Man dares to correct her on this, he is labeled a male chauvinist who thinks women should be at home, barefoot and pregnant. In other words the label 'Male Chauvinist' is used as a substitute for substantive arguments and/or logical thinking. It is easier to assign a label then it is to prove someone wrong through facts and figures.
First off, you didn't "remind" me that you had no animosity toward older women because you didn't state it the first time! Is that the best you can do? Well, I guess I will be nice and give you credit for trying.
Actually, no I'm not hot. I am 5' 10", 130 lbs with long brown hair and FAR TOO BEAUTIFUL for an O.F.F (OLD FAT FART) such as yourself. Furthermore, are you incapable of getting your point across? Why else would you feel the need to keep referring to the O.F.F syndrome,a childish term, which you made up? You see, men who are capable of getting their points across effectively, need not repeat themselves. Yes, I've read your other posts and you mention that along with your western culture b.s. in many of them.
I have to agree with you on one thing. Women are like cars, collectors cars- THE OLDER THEY GET, THE MORE THEY'RE WORTH! Funny thing is if you'd look around you'd see that most middle aged men prefer the cars from their era-ones they had when they were in high school.
NO! Women do not LOVE TO BE OBJECTIFIED! I challenge you to randomly ask women of all ages whether they would like to be objectified or not instead just assuming! That's your problem! You think you're God's gift to all women, when in fact if you asked around you'd find out fairly quickly that you aren't SO HOT yourself.
You made the comment that if a woman make a case for the sky not being blue and when a man dares to correct her on this, he is labeled a male chauvinist who thinks women should be at home, barefoot and pregnant. May I ask Mr. "know it all" what if it's cloudy and raining that day are you still going to "try" (oh there's that word again) to convince her that it is blue?
I never attempted to prove you wrong about anything but you sure did prove me right about everything. I hope your "would be girlfriend" reads your posts and comes to her senses before she gets her heart broken by a man that's going to dump her when she hits 30 whether she stimulates him below the belt or not. Either way she's a goner, you said it yourself. Why do you think women don't deserve/desire love and respect?
You are right, the label "Mail Chauvinist" means absolutely NOTHING! The label "male chauvinist," on the other hand, does. What is a mail chauvinist, by the way? Is it another one of you made up words? You really ought to reconsider your grammer.