i personally do not think the angel nurses were all that harsh.. one of nadya's complaints was that someone made the comment aw that baby is so tiny i could fit it in my purse.. and nadya freaked out and said pretending you're gonna kidnap my child is not a joking matter.. dr phil asked nadya if the words had been said in a threatening tone, and nadya admitted that no, the words had been said in a sweet way but she did not think they were appropriate words to say because they should be more sensitive to her fears.. how could the atmosphere "not" be tense if they are having to walk on eggshells to sidestep nadya's oversensitivity?
how many thousands of times have people made similar comments when cuddling with babies and it is perfectly normal and nonthreatening.. like if someone says "aw i could just eat you up" should the mother take that as legitimate concerns that the person is a cannibal and can't be trusted or they just might eat her baby for breakfast? i am an overprotective mother myself but just because someone comments how sweet and tiny my baby is i don't think i would jump to the conclusion that they're just unnecessarily planting fears in my head that someone will stick him in their pocket and run off with him.. if she is truly that protective then why does she spend such little time in the nursery with them? that is not protectiveness, that is paranoia, and by nadya's own words she admitted she is paranoid..
and she resented their "rules" about how to keep the nursery as a germ free zone, but wasn't that what they were there for, to coach her on that sort of thing, to establish a healthy environment? and because they were doing what they were supposed to be doing that makes them the bad guys? i mean i know there tones of voice did sound very irritated, but frankly i might have a hard time keeping my voice down too if there had been cause to report her three times in less than a week, or if i expressed a need to install a security system and instead she installs a hot tub.. maybe nadya just innocently misheard the suggestion?? oh, when you said we need to do something about the guy trying to get in at 3am before he comes back again, i thought you meant invite him to a hot tub party! oops. silly me!
maybe it's just me but i honestly don't think they are "picking" on nadya.. i think they have very valid reasons that from the onset of this arrangement they've been so insistent about nadya accepting supervision.. child welfare services don't issue warnings such as "do it this way or you might lose your kids" just to be mean or to issue empty threats.. they would only play hard ball like that if they have legitimate reasons to say we are this-close to having to remove them from the home but we're bending over backwards to keep the family together and give you a chance to step up before it comes to that.. they don't offer those warnings lightly, they don't say it just to be rude..
those ladies have been around the block.. they are not naive enough or childish enough to play the head games nadya wants us to believe they are playing.. they would not risk their jobs by falsifying reports.. i did not get the impression that they were the least bit unprofessional..
i know nadya does have a team of nannies now and i don't doubt those babies are being taken care of round the clock.. but there is more to childcare than going through the motions.. they need to bond with a primary caregiver before failure to thrive becomes an issue.. babies can literally die from not having enough one-on-one interaction.. if they don't have one special person they can connect with, they begin to disconnect in general, till gradually they lose interest in eating and eventually don't bother taking the next breath.. my words seem mello-dramatic, i know, but unfortunately it is all too true, it happens.. they may bond with a particular nanny, which can be good in the short term, until nadya feels threatened and fires her in a jealous fit.. if she keeps throwing people out every time there is a personality conflict, the kids are gonna get attached to people then lose them, until the older ones decide they cannot trust or count on or get close to anyone.. self contained, trying to fill the void with everything but healthy interaction.. in other words, there will be 14 nadyas on the loose some day, if they live that long..
i know all of that is just a possible scenerio, i can't predict the future.. but people who have seen this kind of thing play out can't help but see the pattern of which direction it is going if nadya doesn't come down off of her cloud and start mothering her children.. the angels have seen the patterns time and again, they know what to look for, they know it when they see it and when to express concerns.. doctor phil knows his stuff too and i don't think he would continue involving himself in spite of his intentions to let yesterday be the last show on the topic, in spite of the fact that he knows he's losing viewers who are tired of hearing nadya's name or seeing her face.. the emotions would not be so high unless there are true concerns..
i just don't agree with "poor nadya, they're being so mean to her!" i do say "poor nadya" in the sense that i know she has a full plate and i know she has alot of issues and i do feel sorry for her up to a point.. but i don't think anyone is being "mean", they are being PROTECTIVE! that is why they are called child PROTECTION services.. i think they want to help nadya as much as help the babies, to give her some true help instead of catering to what she thinks she wants as she spins out of control with her spending sprees.. it is very frustrating when someone is in obvious need of help and you really do want to offer it but they won't (or can't, or are not ready to) acknowledge their need for support and accept it.. when you sincerely want to make things easier and healthier for them and they fight you tooth and nail.. yeah, by the end of the day you might be a little bit grumpy.. especially when meanwhile and most importantly there are more than a dozen children's welfare at stake.. so i for one think their exasperated tones of voices have been perfectly understandable and forgivable..
but that is just my opinion:)