Quote From: crkd420 I assume he has no education on the subject because I did some research on it. He doesn't. He went to a performing arts college and only started speaking out about this, since he became a Scientologist. No I have never had PPD but several family members and friends have. I have had OCD for many years as well as panic attacks, including two suicide attempts. I've spent the last four years of my life studying psychology and have many family members in the field. Tom Cruise doesn't know what he's talking about. I know for a fact that he has never experienced any type of debilitating mental illness, nor does he have expertise in the field, therefore he knows nothing of what he speaks. The fact that he makes such blanket generalizations such as, "All psychiatry is a crock" and says that severe mental diseases like schizophrenia can be fixed by simple exercise and vitamins proves how ridiculous this is. The fact that we are even arguing about it is mind-blowing. Sweetie, I never said that drugs work for everyone, because I know they don't. However his ridiculous position is that no drugs work for anyone and psychiatry is EVIL. Then he has the nerve to admonish his ex for taking drugs for PPD. Who is he to admonish anyone? He is an ACTOR. The fact that he's so pompous and arrogant about the whole thing, makes it that much worse. With Matt Lauer for example, he was so disrespectful and insulting. He tries to come across like he's an expert with years of experience and medication trials under his belt, when in reality he has niether. He is giving one side of the story, which is the side that has been told to him by fellow scientologists. To not even acknowlege that these drugs may be beneficial for some people, including his ex wife who obviously suffered right in front of him but improved through the use of the drugs, is so completely ignorant. What scares me is some people are going to take what this joker has to say seriously without doing research of their own, just because he's TOM CRUISE and rule out taking medications that could potentially better their life. This country is so celebrity - obsessed. Honestly, if a random educated, experienced doctor came out and made the same statements and allegations that Tom Cruise made, it wouldn't have gotten half the coverage and controversy that Tom's statements have gotten. That is really sad. Americans put more stock in what a random celebrity has to say than a fully-credentialed educated doctor. So now unfortunately when a severely mentally ill person seeks out help and advice and is told to start taking medication, some doctors are going to get the response of , "Well Tom Cruise says I shouldn't."
Again, medication does not work for all people, but to make the statement that psychiatry is an evil crock, and that psychiatric medication works for no one and therapy works for no one, and that all you need if you're severely mentally ill, is a walk through the park and some Flintstones' Vitamins is not only ridiculous, but is completely reckless too. It's his duty as a celebrity, since our culture puts more value on what celebrities say, than what doctors say, to tell both sides of the story, and not just his uneducated religious opinion on the subject.
"it took someone like Tom Cruise to get people talking".................that's evidence right there, of how much stock our country puts in what celebrities say or think...................thank god we have Tom.
Without medication OCD would still rule my life.
Part of the reason people are talking about this is because Tom Cruise accused Brooke Shields of promoting the drugs, which may or may not be true, but three women recently appeared on Oprah during the follow up Brooke Shields interview, telling of how Brooke Shields gave them the courage to go get treated. Two specifically mentioned medication, and one didn't even have moderate or severe depression, she just felt a little sad and blue. I don't believe that Tom Cruise is incapable of learning about any subject besides acting. And it doesn't sound like you have read the transcript of the Matt Lauer interview. If you search for my previous post I have pasted in an article from Peter Breggins, a psychiatrist, who Thanked Tom Cruise for bringing attention to this very serious matter. He also said that it sounded like Tom had read his book, and it sounds the same way to me.
Recently I was at lunch with an acquaintance who was telling me that his professor said that the whole "anti-drug" movement had been invented by Scientologists because they had lost too many members of their "cult" when they took psychiatric drugs, recovered from their illnesses and no longer needed the Scientologists. But to me that sounds like the biggest crock of all time, especially considering the data on adverse effects. I am a Methodist, not a scientologist. I don't know anyone personally who is a scientologist but I know a lot of people who are against medication because of what it has done to them.
While some people hold your view that one has to be a doctor or a psychologist to know anything, others believe that through a little reading you can learn a lot. I have read The Antidepressant Fact Book by Peter Breggins. In this book it is explained that for Prozac, the science behind the FDA approval is completely messed up. I am currently reading Talking Back to Prozac by Peter Breggins and Prozac: Panacea or Pandora by Ann Blake Tracy.
I can tell you from personal experience with several doctors that there is a major attitude problem interfering with care of patients.
I can also tell you that doctors do not usually listen. When I went to my doctor at 6 days postpartum because a home health nurse told me I neede meds, I tried to tell him what was going on and he cut me off and said, what did the nurse tell you? I said she told me to get meds for anxiety (not depression). I asked for a thyroid test because of what my mother-in-law went through. He told me there are no valid postpartum levels of thyroid. He told me to take the meds for at least 6 months or more.
When I became psychotic within 3 days of starting Zoloft, I went to the hospital to get help. Eventually I was able to talk to a psychiatrist (after over 24 hours in limbo). I asked him if he thought I could have PTSD from witnessing my son nearly die in the ER at 3 days of age from a life-threatening choking incident. He said, 'Your son didn't almost die." I said, what about PTSD and he said, "I have no idea." Then he proceeded to ask me a bunch of irrelevant questions like, did you date in high school, and have you ever been arrested, and do you ever check the locks. Then he "diagnosed' me with PPD with Psychotic features and OCD and told me to take parenting classes. I asked if the Zoloft could have caused an immediate placebo effect and he said probably, and I asked if it could have caused the bad thoughts and he said, no, stay on your meds.
Later I saw another psychologist and psychiatrist. For 3 months no one told me of the possibility that I should try getting off the meds because the symptoms I was having appeared AFTER I started the meds. Even after I found out I had postpartum thyroidits at 6 weeks, my son's pediatrician, my endocrinologist, psychiatrist, and psychologist all recommended I stay on the meds.
If that isn't an example of why "psychiatry" can be a crock, I don't know what is.
I am really glad you aren't flushing toilets 42 times any more. Perhaps your SSRI is working for you. But to say that anything Tom Cruise says is automatically wrong, because he is a scientologist and has no degree in medicine or psychology, is faulty logic. I hope that before you get out of med school you are able to develop a type of personality that will allow you to consider the true scientific method as a continual process of proving things WRONG. You must know by now that you can never prove something is right, only whether a previously held belief is wrong or inaccurate. WIthout that basic understanding, and with such a closed mind as you seem to have, I don't think it is ethical for you to practice medicine.
If you would read Peter Breggins' research which he obtained from the drug companies through citing the Freedom of Information act, then perhaps you would understand why Tom Cruise and others are so upset with the recklessness with which psychiatric medicines are prescribed.
Here are some facts:
Ely Lilly used placebo washout in their initial clinical trials for Prozac, premarketing. This means that at the start of the study, they gave all participants a placebo. All participants who responded very well to placebo were eliminated, and the trial began over again with a control group (inert placebo) and a Prozac group.
Efficacy on Prozac during the "washed out" trial (in terms of improvement, though not recovery) was 41% Prozac, 31% placebo.
While this makes it seem like Prozac is better, in actuality the methodology is flawed.
When Prozac was compared to an active placebo, there was no difference in recovery between Prozac and the active placebo (one that causes side effects such as sweating or dry mouth).
Here is another fact: only 286 patients were participants in the published studies that led to Prozac becoming approved.
And another fact: it takes two "positive" studies for the FDA to approve a drug. It doesn't matter how many negative studies were conducted, the FDA doesn't care about those. As long as researchers can wrangle up some positive results the drug gets approved. A positive study means a study that satisfied the study's own arbitrarily determined hypotheses, such as checking off fewer negative statements on a self-report questionnaire. The positivity of the study is determined by the researcher.
Ely Lilly hired out doctors to conduct their studies but collected data and analyzed it in secret with company employees.
They also tried to release a mirror image of Prozac (the right-handed form) when the patent was about to run out, but the FDA actually wouldn't approve that drug because it was way too dangerous.
Suicidality is twice as high on Prozac (or another SSRI) as placebo.
The SSRIs have also been linked to cancer, heart problems (much like Fen-Phen, which was very similar), high cholesterol, hypothyroidism, anorexia, and they take a similar action on the brain as does cocaine or LSD, meth, and PCP. Schizophrenia seems to be caused in part by an elevated level of serotonin in the brain, and SSRIs increase serotonin in the brain.
A couple of weeks ago I went to a lecture with a Professor from UT Southwestern Medical School in Dallas. The topic was Prozac and the developing brain. This was a very pro-drug lecture designed to comfort the attendees in the safety of the drug. The professor's name was Graham Emslie. He stated that there currently is no data to prove sufficient efficacy of Prozac or any other SSRI. He said that "we think it works, but there are many methodological problems with the research. The problem is that these news stories are scaring people off and we won't be able to get enough participants for future studies."
When I asked him why he thought the suicidal thinking was increasing on SSRIs he said that they cause disinhibition and agitation.
When I asked him what the effect was on a nursing infant whose mother takes an SSRI, he said that there were studies on infant rats fed Prozac causing lifelong anxiety and depression, but no studies on any infants who nurse. He said that it is advised not to nurse if you are taking an SSRI because they don't know the effect on the infant. Brooke Shields nursed her daughter, if I am not mistaken. I also nursed my son while I took these meds.
When I asked my obgyn what the effect would be on my son when I started Zoloft, he said, "It will make him happy too."
So it seems to me that there is a wide range of "information" available from different doctors.
I know this post is disjointed somewhat. I really encourage you to consider some evidence that you haven't seen yet. You should be able to handle the truth even if it is hard to take- after all you are a med student!