Message Boards

Topic : 10/07 The Latest Debates

Number of Replies: 6020
New Messages This Week: 0
Last Reply On:
Created on : Friday, September 30, 2005, 03:40:18 pm
Author : DrPhilBoard1

Dr. Phil and his guests strike up heated conversations as they debate the latest hot topics. Should women give up their right to breastfeed their babies in public so other people don't feel uncomfortable? Will passing out condoms in schools prevent unwanted pregnancies or just send the message to kids that it's OK to have sex? And, is it acceptable for others to discipline your kids if they see them acting out in public, or should they just mind their own business? Dr. Phil weighs in on these controversial subjects. Share your thoughts, join the discussion.

 

Find out what happened on the show.

 

More October 2005 Show Boards.


As of January, 2009, this message board will become "Read Only" and will be closed to further posting. Please join the NEW Dr. Phil Community to continue your discussions, personalize your message board experience, start a blog and meet new friends.

User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
October 7, 2005, 1:01 pm PDT

YES!

Quote From: niksofine

AMEN to that! I totally agree! It is truly sad that this is even an issue for people.
Well said.!!!
 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
October 7, 2005, 1:01 pm PDT

Breast feeding

I am the mother of three children and breast fed all of them whenever and wherever they were hungry. I don't understand why people have such a problem with women doing this in public. This is what we were given the breast for. Just like our mouths are for feeding ourselves, breasts are for feeding our young.  We don't cover our mouths when we eat why should we cover our breast when we feed our children. What would we have done before the 20th century if women hadn't breast fed. None of us would be here. If you want a happy healthy well rounded child...BREASTFEED and don't be ashamed.  
 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
frustrated
October 7, 2005, 1:01 pm PDT

more parents need to be parenting

I work in a retail environment where there are many breakable items. Parents will come in with their young children and let them free, like it is a day care facility. More mercandise is broken by unattended children then by clumsy adults. If I see a child with a parent no where in sight and that child is rough handling an item we nicely ask the child to be careful that it is breakable. Our store policy is that we do not make the customer pay for a broken item, if we did would more parents pay attention to their children. These women say that no one should discipline their child but them. Well if they were then other people wouldn't have to. If your child is a wild one and you know it then why would you bring them to a target rich environment!!
 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
October 7, 2005, 1:01 pm PDT

10/07 The Latest Debates

Quote From: boobmama

I personaly feel that a child has every right to eat in public no matter if it's artificial or natural.  I am offended to see bottle-feeders however I would never make them go in the bathroom etc to eat. nor would I ask them to cover up the baby because the bottle offends me. 

You should be careful by saying that it offends you to see a bottle fed baby...I breast fed my child until I could not anymore....(reasons...none of anyones business) but does that mean that I am not giving my child the best that I can?  Does it make me a bad mom???  There are women that cannot nurse for many reasons and by making that comment...you are making them feel even worse than they already do.  That is a hurtful comment to make.  We are talking about a simple thing of just trying to be discreet in public.  I don't think that that is bad at all.  When I did breast feed...I didn't think that that was a problem or took it offensively....I do however take the comment of "you find it offensive when you see a bottle being fed to a baby"  Even when I was breast feeding...sometimes I would pump and put it into a bottle.  I don't think that that is at all wrong.   

 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
October 7, 2005, 1:02 pm PDT

The breast IS NOT a sexual body part.

Quote From: britsie

I think that Americans  need to start thinking about the reaction of others before doing something controversial in public. A breast is a sexual body part, there is no controversy over that. When you expose yourself in public, people notice,  no matter what the reason.  

  

It boils down to common COURTESY. Would you want your father's best friend to be embarassed because you nursed your baby in front of him? I think most people would choose to respect that man's right not to be a part of that most PRIVATE moment.  

  

Another problem I think this country has is allowing babies and  children into cocktail lounges. When Friday night comes, I want to be able to go into a bar and let my hair down, and not worry about the content of conversation and swearing coming from my table (consisting of all adults) because there is  a kid at the next booth.  

  

 I have actually seen people come into bars with those little carrying cases for infants and placing them ON THE BAR while the parents drank booze. And before the nonsmoking laws, it was worse...these babies were inhaling toxic smoke for several hours.  

  

Maybe it is my religious belief, but I feel that  people internalize their environment. Even if you think that your baby is unaware of what is going on when you expose him to adverse conditions, he is taking in all of the toxins and swearing. Society has no idea the price it will pay by allowing this type of behavior. If parents can't make responsible decisions regarding their children, then we need to change the laws to assure decency so that the kids will be protected.  

Just My Opinion, RLK! 

  

  

True, they may have been playthings for my husband, but that IS NOT their purpose.  The purpose of our breasts is to create milk and feed our children.   It's not my fault that you think thier main purpose is to please someone sexually.  Trust me, there is nothing sexual about them. 

There is a slight controversy over it being a sexual body part. 

 
User Mood
Peaceful

Message Emote
chillin'
October 7, 2005, 1:02 pm PDT

Birds and the Bees

It is true, the perfect means of protection is abstinence, but unfortunately sex is performed despite the consequences, such as HIV, AIDS, and pregnancy. Considering sex is costless and a solution to intimate desires, sex will proceed to remain as an interest and an activity in adolescents. Inaptly, the number of teen pregnancies and sexually transmitted diseases are increasing, regardless of previous tactics. The supplying of condoms in school is a means of safety, equitable to sex education.

Sex education is to inform the adolescents of the process of a new human being coming into existence and in addition often includes topics such as STD and how to avoid them, as well as methods of contraception. The purpose of sex education is to give information and likewise educate how to be safe if they inaptly decide to have adolescent sex. Similarly the aim of rendering condoms is to encourage safe sex if any sex. 

 

 
User Mood
Silly

Message Emote
angry
October 7, 2005, 1:02 pm PDT

Breasfeeding in public

I am appalled that anyone would be so idiotic as the woman on the show today she said "I didn't say wipe your breast on the toilet before you feed your child"... like my husband said.. let's serve you a 5 course meal while you are sitting on the toilet. Come on!! It smells of poop and urine in the bathroom. I don't even like using a public restroom to relieve myself  because of that.. why would I feed my child in that environment?!?! 

  

Breastfeeding is natural and normal. I don't see you asking formula feeding mothers to cover there children do you? I am highly offended by seeing women feed their child with bottles, but you don't see me asking them to please go feed their child in the bathroom, do you? No because of the fact that that is THEIR way of feeding their child and breastfeeding in MY way of feeding my child. If you are offended, look away. There are many things in life that are offending... are you going to walk up to everyone who has offened you and ask them to please get out your line of site? I surely hope not.  

  

  

 
User Mood
Stressed

Message Emote
blank
October 7, 2005, 1:02 pm PDT

We're not old enough to vote, but give us condoms

Not to be misleading, I am a teenager who has recently graduated high school that is against handing out condoms in school.  We're not responsible enough to vote, but yet are we responible enough to practifce safe sex?  The majority of us can't even DRIVE A CAR!  When I was in 6th grade, sex was the fartherest thing away from my mind, and in no way was I ready for it.  (My hormones didn't even kick in yet)  Even throughout high school, I think it's wrong.  The kids are so young, and there's even laws against somebody over 18 having sex with somebody underage.  That should tell you something right there.  Teaching is different from giving accesibilty.  If a young man gets a condom at school, he can pressure his girlfriend to have sex with him because he has the excuse "it's safe".  Kids should have to go down to the convience store like everybody else, the excuse of emarassment is no excuse, because if you're not too emarassed to do it, you shouldn't be embaressed to go to CVS and buy a pack of condoms.  All the risks should be tought in school, and abstinece education is the best thing.
 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
October 7, 2005, 1:02 pm PDT

Condoms in school

ok soo.. im 19 years old and the whole handing out condoms in school is NOT going to pursuade my decision to have sex or not. if i want to have sex... IM GOING TO HAVE SEX.  Kids my age are not  thinking... "omg they are handing out condoms so... im going to find someone to go have sex with."  Its either you want to have sex, or you dont.  I have FRIENDS who will be like "here.. have a condom i got them from a seminar the other day".  now because i have them, doesnt mean im going to go out and have sex.  i am currently in a human sexuality class at the university i am attending and it is SAD the things i am learning now and never knew before now.  there needs to me more education in high school on sex education.  And you can try abstinence all you want in schools.. its not going to work unless you are in a sheltered world and if you choose to have your kids sheltered from reality... when they get in the outside world they are not going to know what to think.  the worst thing you could do is not teach them anything and have it all of a sudden "hit" them in the face when they realize what people are doing.  times are changing, and sex IS happening, so we need to accomodate the changing times instead of impplimenting things that worked 20 years ago for our parents.  parents also need to realize that they should be happy that their kids are being SAFE, rather than sorry and being/getting someone pregnant.  think rationally. 

 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
worried
October 7, 2005, 1:02 pm PDT

Condoms

I would like to know what the statistics would be if abstinance programs were included in sex education classes equally.  Or are they?  Many public schools will not allow actual programs that promote abstinance....just the statement that abstinance is the best way but you need to be educated in preventing STD's and pregnancy.   

  

Dr Phil, you made the comment that teaching abstinance just does not work.  What programs are you familier with that have failed and is this teaching really presented fairly and equally ? 

  

 
First | Prev | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | Next | Last