Quote From: sprlact8rOkay, get a clue here!
First of all, do you like eating in a place where you can smell other people's gas and hear them urinate and defecate? I doubt it. It's not my breast I'm worried about being sanitary; it's the facility itself. My breast doesn't just jump out on its own. Ever notice how many people don't wash their hands? They are touching things I would have to touch. Not to mention it is the rare restroom that has a comfortable, clean, and separate place for nursing moms. If I come across the rare one of those where there is a SEPARATE lounge, I use it IF that's where I am when my baby is hungry.
You know what? I have never taken off a stitch of clothing in order to breastfeed in public, so I don't know where you get the idea that nursing moms are stripping in order to feed. What are you looking at? A "Girls Gone Wild" video??? That isn't how it works. I'm not an exhibitionist. I could probably be in a restaurant booth next you and you wouldn't even know my baby is nursing and not napping in my arms. If you feel the need to look and stare, that's your problem.
It is a sexual issue because this country is obsessed with the female body as a representation of sexuality. I don't know what you think you are seeing. At worst a brief flash of skin when the baby is latching on, but even that is unlikely. If you see a baby that you know is nursing and yet you can't see any part of breast, let alone the nipple...and that makes you uncomfortable...it's YOU.
I have my boundaries and respect my rights and those of my child's first. I'm a mom and it's my job to give my kids the best start possible. Besides, every time a mom nurses her baby in public, that's one more mother acting in a normal loving manner - just as much so as a bottle-feeding mom. There is no shame in using breasts for their intended purpose.
I'm tired of the attitude that is being perpetuated by statements like yours. It shows ignorance and THAT is a true lack of respect.
A friend took a health class last spring, and the results of that class would keep me from ever breastfeeding in a bathroom again. Feces travel through the air - and if the child is not in a separate room, that child is going to be exposed to the ill effects of being in a feces filled environment.
I nursed all three of my sons. With the twins, I ended up with bottles because I did not know enough about breastfeeding. With my youngest son, I nursed him whereever he became hungry. After all, that's one of the benefits of nursing - you don't have to find somewhere to heat a bottle when baby is hungry. I will admit that I was discrete when nursing, and used private facilities when they were available. I would ask for a booth in a restaurant - not only for the privacy in nursing, but to control the twins. I NEVER considered the restroom as an option. Not only are restrooms not the cleanest places in the world, but there are far too few facilities available for women anyway. We should expect our sisters to wait for 20-30 minutes while we tie up an unsanitary, open toilet to feed a child?
On the issue of uncontrolled children in public, I have a few thoughts. First of all, the woman with the children whose pastor asked her not to attend worship, Young Lady, Please bring your children to church, and I'll help you with them. Mine are grown, and I can't express my sadness that your pastor was not more helpful. When my twins were small, they were a handful. I never quit working on the problem, but there were times that they were out of control in public. They were thrown out of story hour at the library, so I understand your pain and embarassment that there is a public area that you feel is off limits to you. Secondly, there are far too many people who want to control other people's children these days. Some of them are dangerous to children, and we teach children to be leery of strangers. Some people just don't want to be bothered with the sights, sounds and actions of small persons. However, when children are exposed to civilization, they become civilized. Every experience a small child has shapes how that child develops into an adult. Do we want children who think that a restaurant meal equals a trip to McDonald's, or are we willing to be flexible and have restaurants available with times that are better for children? Mind you, this was over 20 years ago, but I used to take my children to restaurants for dinner early in the evening (between 5 & 6 pm) so that we were gone before the date night crowds arrived. We also tried to go to restaurants during the week (off-peak hours) instead of Friday and Saturday nights. The smaller the crowd, the easier it is to control the children. My children are now adults, and fond of going out to dinner. They use appropriate manners in public, and are not an embarassment to others. Without early exposure to the possibility, my children would still be eating all home cooked meals.
On the topic of condoms in the schools, Dr. Phil was correct when he said that expecting teens to pay for condoms would result in early shoplifting. I had a student admit to that just last spring. If we as parents do not teach our children how to protect themselves against STD's and early pregnancies, we will be raising our grandchildren. Now, I am not an advocate of teen-aged sexual practice, but I have worked in a middle school environment for several years. The results of that experience are that MOST 7th grade girls are sexually active, and MOST 8th grade boys are "benefitting" from that activity. It is a sad situation, but expecting teens who still are not working to pay for birth control generally means that they use none, and end up with a pregnancy in their early teens. If the young lady carries the child to term, she will have significantly affected her health for the rest of her life. If she chooses to abort, she will have to carry the emotional scars for the rest of her life. I am NOT an advocate of early sexual practice, but I cannot help but think that teaching teens to protect themselves is better than coping with the results.