Message Boards

Topic : 10/07 The Latest Debates

Number of Replies: 6020
New Messages This Week: 0
Last Reply On:
Created on : Friday, September 30, 2005, 03:40:18 pm
Author : DrPhilBoard1

Dr. Phil and his guests strike up heated conversations as they debate the latest hot topics. Should women give up their right to breastfeed their babies in public so other people don't feel uncomfortable? Will passing out condoms in schools prevent unwanted pregnancies or just send the message to kids that it's OK to have sex? And, is it acceptable for others to discipline your kids if they see them acting out in public, or should they just mind their own business? Dr. Phil weighs in on these controversial subjects. Share your thoughts, join the discussion.

 

Find out what happened on the show.

 

More October 2005 Show Boards.


As of January, 2009, this message board will become "Read Only" and will be closed to further posting. Please join the NEW Dr. Phil Community to continue your discussions, personalize your message board experience, start a blog and meet new friends.

User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
October 11, 2005, 10:26 am PDT

Funny

Quote From: linzjongat

Possessed food or fresh food, which is healthier? 

I doubt any one will argue. 

Make your choices about what is best for you, your baby, and your family. 

We make so many choices that effect the health and development of our children through out their lives. There are effects from every decision. This is just one choice.  

I'm sorry, I just had to laugh.  You say "POSSESSED" food or fresh, not processed vs fresh.  It's not to make fun of you.  It just made me think of some demon being in the food. hehe 

  

Fresh of course, unless it is sprayed by pesticides.  But, if it's not, then the fresh wins by all means.  As well as breast milk.   

  

  

 
User Mood
Stressed

Message Emote
blank
October 11, 2005, 10:26 am PDT

READ IT AGAIN!

Quote From: mojomo_99

First off, since you know you get pregnant that easily, maybe abstinence until married. Ever thought of that? The whole issue here was control and discipline...obviously something you missed. I am a female registered OR nurse, and yes, we have tied tubes on people your age with two babies. You sound like you have some real pent-up anger about men, maybe from being left with three young children, but has marriage ever entered into the picture? You would then have the law on your side with child support and alimony if necessary. Get some counselling and don't blame your problems on the guy who wrote in. I agree with him totally!
I AM A SINGLE MOM OF FOUR AND 22.  BUT I AM A GOOD MOTHER!  I HAVE MY OWN CAR, MY OWN HOUSE, MY FIVE YEAR OLD HAS THE IQ OF A TEN YEAR OLD.  I WAS IN A REALTIONSHIP FOR SEVEN YEARS IT IS NOT THAT I WAS SLEEPING AROUN WITH ALL DIFFERENT GUYS.  THE FATHER OF MY CHILDREN DID SIGN THE BIRTH CRETIFICATES, SO IF I WANTED TO GO AFTER HIT THROUGH THE "LAW" I COULD.  AND THEY WOULD BE ON MY SIDE!  THE DIFFERNECE IS I CHOOSE NOT TO!  I DO NOT FEEL THAT I NEED TO GET HELP FROM A MAN THAT IS NOT THERE FOR THEM SO WHY WOULD I WANT HIS MONEY.  I DO IT JUST FIEN ON MY OWN WITH NO HELP.  I DO NOT GET HELP FROM THE STATE OR ANY ONE ELSE FOR THAT MATTER.  I AM A VERY RESPONSIBLE PARENT.  AND I DO NOT BELIEVE THAT JUST BECAUSE YOU BECOME PREGNANT MEANS THAT YOU SHOULD HAVE TO GET MARRIED.  THAT IS JUST LOOKING FOR A DIVORCE AND IT IS UNHEATHLY FOR THE CHILDREN.  AS A NURSE YOU SHOULD KNOW THAT.  THIS IS NOT THE 1950'S AND IT IS TIME TO WAKE UP.  PLENTY OF WOMEN ARE SINGLY MOTHERS AND DO JUST FINE ON THEIR OWN.  JUST BECAUSE THEY MAY BE A MOM DOES NOT MEAN THEY NEED A MAN.  AND I DO HAVE MY TUBE TIED NOW BUT THEY WOULD NOT DO IT AFTER MY SECOND CHILD.  I WAS LIVING IN ARIZONA WHERE I WAS BORN AND RAISED, IF YOU DO NOT BELIEVE CALL AROUND IN ARIZONA AND YOU WILL FIND OUT REAL QUICK THAT THE DOCTORS WILL REFUSE TO TIE THE TUBES OF A WOMAN UNDER 25 AND WITH LESS THEN FOUR KIDS.  I HAVE BEEN ON MY OWN SINCE I WAS 14 PAYING MY OWN BILLS, KEEPING A GOOD JOB, RAISING MY KIDS, AND GOING TO SCHOOL.  SO NO I DON'T THINK I MISSED ANYTHING.  AND IT IS NOT LIKE I ONLY TRIED ONE TYPE OF BIRTH CONTROL.  NOT ONLY THAT I HAVE FOUND OUT IN THE LAST YEAR SOME THING DOCTORS NOR NURSES TELL YOU WHEN YOU ARE TAKING THE PILL OR GETTING A DEPO.  IS THAT IF YOU TAKE AN ANTIBIOTIC WHILE ON BIRTH CONTROL IT WILL MAKE THE BIRTH CONTROL NULL AND VOID.  IT COUNTER ACTS IT.  THAT IS WHAT MY CURRENT DOCTOR LET ME KNOW.  AND NO I DO NOT BELIEVE A MAN WITH NO CHILD HAS THE RIGHT TO PASS JUDGEMENT ON ANY MOTHER.  LET ALONE A SINGLE MOTHER.  I AM NOT ANGRY AT HIM BECAUSE OF MY PAST I AM ANGRY BECAUSE HE DARES TO PAST JUDGMENT ABOUT SOMETHING HE KNOWS NOTHING ABOUT.  AND MAYBE IF YOU ARE MAKING THAT TYPE OF JUDGMENT ON A SINGLE MOM MAY YOU NEED TO LOOK IN THE MIRROR AND LOOK AT MAYBE YOUR OWN RELATIONSHIPS WITH YOUR PARENTS OR EVEN THE RELATION SHIP YOU HAVE WITH YOUR KIDS.  HOW AM I BLAMING MY "PROBLEMS" ON ANY ONE.  AS FAR AS I CAN TELL I AM DOING PREETY FLIPPIN GOOD FOR A 22 YEAR OLD SINGLE MOM OF FOUR CHILDREN.  I DON'T KNOW MANY SINGLE MOMS OF FOUR KIDS THAT HAVE A GOOD JOB, OWN THEIR BRAND NEW CAR, OWN THERE HOME, AND PAY FOR THEIR CHILDRENS MEDICAL INSURANCE AND BILLS ALL BY THEMSELFS.  SO DON'T LAY JUDGMENT ON ME.  I AM DOING PRETTY GOOD IF I DO SAY SO MYSELF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
October 11, 2005, 10:28 am PDT

I agree.

Quote From: tica1213

I am a mother of three who breastfed each child for two years.  I breastfed anywhere and anytime that my children were hungry.  And yet I NEVER exposed my breasts.  There were many times that friends and/or strangers would look at me and or talk to me and yet not even know I was indeed breastfeeding.  I live in Florida, where by law I can breastfeed in public.  I agree that  woman should be ale to breastfeed her baby ANYWHERE. I also know that there is no need to expose the breast while nursing.  There are specially designed clothes for discrete nursing and there are ways to cover up so that the worl does not see the breast.  I do not find it an unpleasant thing to see.  I actually feel sad for little babies whose mom's chose to not breastfeed so that they are less tied to the baby and more freedom to come and go.  How a mom cannot want to hold a child to her breast to feed him is beyond me and yet I understand that it a choice for everyone to make.  Mothers who do not breastfeed there children do not love their children anyless than those who do.  I am glad thati did and would never think of offering my baby formula when I have two breasts that work just fine.  I also think that mom's who say they tried to breastfeed and quit after only days or weeks, didn;t try enough.  Rarely does a mom not have enough milk for her baby. Ignorance, stress and lack of support or usually to blame. 

  

Marta P. 

Miami, Florida 

Want to know what your state law says?

Take a look: http://www.lalecheleague.org/LawBills.html

Illinois says:

Public Act 093-0942, SB 3211, enacted August 16, 2004.

Section 1. Short title. This Act may be cited as the Right to Breastfeed Act.

Section 5. Purpose. The General Assembly finds that breast milk offers better nutrition, immunity, and digestion, and may raise a baby's IQ, and that breastfeeding offers other benefits such as improved mother-baby bonding, and its encouragement has been established as a major goal of this decade by the World Health Organization and the United Nations Children's Fund. The General Assembly finds and declares that the Surgeon General of the United States recommends that babies be fed breastmilk, unless medically contraindicated, in order to attain an optimal healthy start.

Section 10. Breastfeeding Location. A mother may breastfeed her baby in any location, public or private, where the mother is otherwise authorized to be, irrespective of whether the nipple of the mother's breast is uncovered during or incidental to the breastfeeding; however, a mother considering whether to breastfeed her baby in a place of worship shall comport her behavior with the norms appropriatein that place of worship.

Section 15. Private right of action. A woman who has been denied the right to breastfeed by the owner or manager of a public or private location, other than a private residence or place of worship, may bring an action to enjoin future denials of the right to breastfeed. If the woman prevails in her suit, she shall be awarded reasonable attorney's fees and reasonable expenses of litigation.

Section 99. Effective date. This Act takes effect upon becoming law.

720 ILCS 5/11-9, 1995 ILL. ALS 59; 1995 Ill. Laws 59; 1995 ILL. P.A. 59; 1995 ILL. SB 190;

Sec. 11-9. Public indecency. (a) Any person of the age of 17 years and upwards who performs any of the following acts in a public place commits a public indecency: ...

(2) A lewd exposure of the body done with intent to arouse or to satisfy the sexual desire of the person. Breast-feeding of infants is not an act of public indecency.
 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
October 11, 2005, 10:31 am PDT

Breastfeeding

Quote From: abstract

hang on one moment...  

  

I was molested as a child, and I was raped as a teenager. Several times. I then had the person who did that to me blow his head off and leave me a nice letter about how it was my fault. Don't assume that my life belongs in an episode of Donna Reed because I advocate breastfeeding because it's the best choice for eeryone. 

  

I still think everyone should breastfeed. I think people should quit playing the victim card and start surviving. Breastfeeding reduces the risk of PPD, and most women find it empowering to see how their bodies which they spend so much time being disconnected from can sustain life. No one took your choice to breastfeed away from you. You still have that choice. You survived your abuse and you could have made the decision to at least try it. 

  

There is nothing dirty about an innocent child drinking breastmilk. THAT is natural, rape is not. Just because you were abused doesn't mean you shouldn't enjoy your body for what it was made for. Maybe if you tried it you would understand the difference. 

  

And oh, people who have had breast reductions can nurse too. 

  

I refuse to go over the details with you, but I will say that because it was a particular family member and a particular incident. I relate it to breastfeeding. . I will not try to take back that power because my kids are to old now and I don't plan on having any more children. However; I did try it once and I ( this is me personally) felt nasty. That is all I will say on that subject. 

  

  Yes! I know that some people Can infact breastfeed after a breast reduction. I, on the other hand, was not so lucky. The doctor did not do such a good job on me. But thanks for the response. 

 
User Mood
Apathetic

Message Emote
blank
October 11, 2005, 10:34 am PDT

Conclusion?

Quote From: lannister

And breast  milk has NOT been shown to increase intelligence. 


This is what I mean by twisting the data.  


The data showed that, in the population sample tested, breast fed babies had slightly higher measurable IQs than bottle fed babies. 


That doesn't mean the breast milk raised the babies' IQs!! 

  

This is what I hate -- this deliberate lying and twisting. 


All the study showed was that, for that particular set of children, the breast fed babies scored a little higher on IQ tests. 


Now, could it be that breast feeding moms were more likely to spend more tiime with their children, and that moms who have that kind of time to spend at home with their children are more likely to come from more affluent families and have access to better nutrition, better health care and better school systems?  Could it be that more affluent moms in the more affluent suburbs are more likely to be better educated themselves?  All of these factors are also indicators for a higher IQ, so the study NEVER isolated breast milk alone, and the breast milk factor, for all ANYONE can prove beyond a doubt, may just be a coincidence. 


This is why statistics are a bad, bad way to go about spreading information. 

  

  

 You are right, "And breast milk has NOT been shown to increase intelligence." A study to prove the contention that it does  would be almost impossible to administer.

But as you apparently accept that, "All the study showed was that, for that particular set of children, the breast fed babies scored a little higher on IQ tests" what is your conclusion?

"... may be just a coincidence." is not a conclusion.
 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
October 11, 2005, 10:35 am PDT

well put

Quote From: merganthe

being Ladylike has nothing to do with actual motherhood.  Enough with the Madonna comparison.  Time to GET REAL about the job.  I've been puked on, peed on, pooped on, experienced bouts of explosive vomiting, food dumped all over the place, and that's just with one child.  I sympathize with those who have gone through baby & toddlerhood more than once.  I have immense respect for those mothers who have more than a single child.    

  

As for nursing in a restroom --- UM -- where does one sit?  On the dirty floor?????  I haven't been in any rooms of rest with comfy & clean chairs lately.  Are there any that exist in the mundane world?   "Somewhere you can have privacy"   Try that little feat with arms full of hungry child in a public locale such as a mall or elsewhere.  It's extremely difficult to do.    

  

My munchkin just turned two and she's a real angel despite her rough health history.  She's severely allergic to milk.  Because of this, we are still a nursing couple.  It has it's ups and downs, but overall, she's healthier, more secure, and better nurished than any other option.   She was on a 60-90 minute feeding schedule when she was an infant, so we had to nurse in public.   

Once she outgrew her preemiehood at 12 months, we rarely did so.  She HATED having her head covered, and very insistent about pushing up my shirt to place her hand on my breast.  We just went to the comfy car with the nice a/c.   LIfe was much easier that way. 

  

This past week, I was travelling in Paris environs with hubby, tot, & mum-in-law.  Well, we nursed in public.  VERY PUBLIC.  Posh places like the Mars room at Versailles, Notre Dame Cathedral, Musée de Cluny, the RER train, a boat on the Seine river, oh, and my favorite.... Musée d'Orsay where she zonked out and we put her in a soft backpack then carried her through the museum. 

  

  Thankfully, everyone we encountered was much less judgemental than some on here.  My child was peaceful, calm, and rested in some very stressful places thanks to being able to nurse.  I am a large breasted woman and those very nice slitted shirts actually show more and require intense fussing with, than just bringing up the bottom and tucking everything around my child's mouth.  Covering her head would have been ridiculous.  The only time anything was in danger of 'showing' was when she was attaching herself onto the nipple.  But that's what's large hubby's are for -- to block lookyloos who can't control themselves.  No skin ever showed -- Can't say that about the Teenyboppers and fat older women going around braless in tank tops. 

  

To answer someone's snide questions about teeth and when to stop...  I really don't know what the issue is about teeth.  She got hers around 10 months -- 4 at one time.  She had gone through the guppy biting phase at 6 months and learned to open her mouth when mommy asked her to.  We dealt with it and moved on.  

  

Regarding stopping --  I figure we'll be done by next year at age 3.  Hopefully, her milk allergy will have lessened (no it's not lactose intolerance) and she'll be big enough to fill in the nutritional blanks with more food.   Since we're not currently travelling with its inherent stresses, it's only 3 times a day anyway.  No biggie.      

  

  

Well put. It helps to consider people's individual needs.
 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
October 11, 2005, 10:39 am PDT

Simply the LAW

  Indecent exposure: intentional exposure of part of one's body (as the genitals) in a place such 

exposure is likely to be an offense against the general accepted standards of decency. 

 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
October 11, 2005, 10:39 am PDT

Sometimes health not just comfort

Quote From: badtrip

Pressuring people to "do it respectfully" is just as bad as telling them not to do it. Women worry they are not being modest enough and choose to bottle feed when in public. This leads to the woman having less stimulation at the breast and milk supply goes down. Then the woman dries up prematurely and baby doesn't get enough time breastfeeding. Currently the WHO recommends nursing for at least 2 years, and natural weaning should be the norm, when the child is ready to quit. 

I just talked to a mom today who was so uncomfortable because she couldn't breastfeed discreetly because her boobies were big that she chose formula while in public. And she was trying to take drugs to increase her supply, even with having nursed 3 babies the longest she has been able to nurse has been with her last child who is 9 months old, and she's already concerned about supply. 

The best way to nurse is OFTEN, as long as the baby wants per side, and on-cue. Also nursing at night will help you keep up your supply - this means co-sleeping, something Dr. Phil I think has a huge problem with (as though it's any of his business). 

I agree. Sometimes nursing in public is about *health* not just making people uncomfortable. Using formula and even pumping and using a bottle can negatively effect a mother's milk supply and put her and her baby at risk that they would not have had if they just nursed on demand.
 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
October 11, 2005, 10:42 am PDT

Want to know the law!

Quote From: volunteer

Want to know what your state law says?

Take a look: http://www.lalecheleague.org/LawBills.html

Illinois says:

Public Act 093-0942, SB 3211, enacted August 16, 2004.

Section 1. Short title. This Act may be cited as the Right to Breastfeed Act.

Section 5. Purpose. The General Assembly finds that breast milk offers better nutrition, immunity, and digestion, and may raise a baby's IQ, and that breastfeeding offers other benefits such as improved mother-baby bonding, and its encouragement has been established as a major goal of this decade by the World Health Organization and the United Nations Children's Fund. The General Assembly finds and declares that the Surgeon General of the United States recommends that babies be fed breastmilk, unless medically contraindicated, in order to attain an optimal healthy start.

Section 10. Breastfeeding Location. A mother may breastfeed her baby in any location, public or private, where the mother is otherwise authorized to be, irrespective of whether the nipple of the mother's breast is uncovered during or incidental to the breastfeeding; however, a mother considering whether to breastfeed her baby in a place of worship shall comport her behavior with the norms appropriatein that place of worship.

Section 15. Private right of action. A woman who has been denied the right to breastfeed by the owner or manager of a public or private location, other than a private residence or place of worship, may bring an action to enjoin future denials of the right to breastfeed. If the woman prevails in her suit, she shall be awarded reasonable attorney's fees and reasonable expenses of litigation.

Section 99. Effective date. This Act takes effect upon becoming law.

720 ILCS 5/11-9, 1995 ILL. ALS 59; 1995 Ill. Laws 59; 1995 ILL. P.A. 59; 1995 ILL. SB 190;

Sec. 11-9. Public indecency. (a) Any person of the age of 17 years and upwards who performs any of the following acts in a public place commits a public indecency: ...

(2) A lewd exposure of the body done with intent to arouse or to satisfy the sexual desire of the person. Breast-feeding of infants is not an act of public indecency.
  Wow! Good research.
 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
October 11, 2005, 10:44 am PDT

One of the worst shows iv seen

I must say i was very let down with a lot of the women on that show.It seemed like most of them didnt put in any time,thought, or research to the topic they were talking about.When seeing the pre-views for the show, i thought for sure the women for breastfeeding in public would bring up some of the very important reasons why its okay, other then im going to do whatever i want and screw everyone else.These are the reasons i wish she would of brought up- its against health code regulations to serve food in a restroom;When people ask a BFing woman to move to someplace more private, a lot of times its because they feel the act is in some way sexual, or others may view it as sexual rather then a natural part of life that all mamals do;Many babies cannot eat while being covered up (think about it would you like to eat lunch with a blanket over your head?), and that asking mothers to cover up can make them feel embarrassed for feeding their baby;Babies need to be breastfeed on demand, and a mother should never feel forced to bottle feed their child;it takes extra time and care to pump, store, and transport milk, and the milk isnt as good as when its fresh from the source; you run a higher risk of developing a plugged duct or breast infection because of the delay between feedings;If she skips a feeding there a good chance she will be very sore from full breasts;If she isnt able to pump her supply will go down slightly;most breastfeeding women show less skin then most shows on tv,ads in magazines,or teenagers..While im not a mom yet (expecting my first in march),im really shocked that a breastfeeding mom wouldnt bring up any of these points. 

  

On the topic of handing out condoms in school- Im very much for it!! Im 22, so it wasnt that long ago that i was in highschool.I dont think the reason that kids will do it anyways is a good reason to hand out condoms, and once again i feel the woman that was for it hardly brought up anything other then  that one reason..First off saying kids are going to drink anyways, so we might as well give them a sixpack is clearly not the same thing as handing out condoms.Saying if kids drink we're going to take away their car keys, in my eyes, is more like handing out condoms.I think schools need MUCH better sex-ed programs,that teach kids that yes protection fails, BUT if you are going to have sex at least take some step to protect yourself, there better then using nothing.I was always tought condoms dont work,so when i did become sexually active i thought why waste the money on something that doesnt work?Luckly im STD free.Having condoms at school wouldnt of changed my mind either way to have sex or not,and having them wouldnt of made me go out and have more sex.It would of made me safer,and in the case of some of my friends prevented them from getting pregnant or getting an STD.Its just like putting on a seatbelt in a car,yeah they can be faulty and not work, but its better to have one on then take the chance.Every single teen that is even thinking about sex should be able to get condoms ,period.. 

 
First | Prev | 520 | 521 | 522 | 523 | 524 | 525 | 526 | 527 | 528 | 529 | Next | Last