Message Boards

Topic : 06/06 "I'm Gay, OK?"

Number of Replies: 4125
New Messages This Week: 0
Last Reply On:
Created on : Friday, October 14, 2005, 03:56:41 pm
Author : DrPhilBoard1

(Original Air Date: 10/19/05) Sexual orientation used to be something kept hidden from family and co-workers, but now more and more people are "coming out" and finding acceptance. Anjela says her mother and sister don't support her sexual orientation, and feel she can't be Christian and gay at the same time. Can they reconcile this touchy issue? Then, two men debate whether a person can go from gay to straight, and parents of a 4-year-old boy fear their son's desire to play with dolls and wear heels means he'll grow up to be gay. Are they overreacting to his wishes to be a princess instead of a prince? Talk about gender and gay issues here.


Find out what happened on the show.

 

More June 2006 Show Boards.


As of January, 2009, this message board will become "Read Only" and will be closed to further posting. Please join the NEW Dr. Phil Community to continue your discussions, personalize your message board experience, start a blog and meet new friends.

User Mood
Relaxed

Message Emote
happy
October 20, 2005, 5:16 pm PDT

Encore!

Quote From: openmind1

 

Jesus didn't gay people but he sure did HATE hypocrites! I see quite a few of them here on this message board. They are people who have become so full of pride and self-righteousness because they worship the bible AS GOD's WORD instead of JESUS as GOD'S WORD. They think by doing so they can get free license to predict God’s mind on EVERYTHING and use the bible to judge others.   

 

THIS IS CALLED FUNDAMENTALISM.  It is hypocritical. WHY? 

 

Because NO CHRISTIAN ever obeys the entire bible. It is impossible. Even Paul said he cannot do it. Read Romans 7:15 to 25. Paul says he CANNOT STOP SINNING! HE JUST CANNOT DO IT!  Therefore it amazes me how religious homophobes pick and choose which sins they want to biblically condemn according to their prejudices, personal comforts and popular opinion. These fundamentalist Christian sects are taking old outdated laws in Leviticus and Paul’s letters to the Christians living over 2000 years ago OUT OF CONTEXT and demanding slavish obedience to them. It’s like Jesus never came and set us free of this kind of dogmatic bondage. Bible fundamentalism results in laziness, literalism, hypocrisy, self-righteousness, complacency and rejection of scientific facts and modern discoveries leading to dogmatic stupidity.  

 

I want people to know that not ALL Christians are like these fundamentalist hypocrites. There are those of us out there who are still fair-minded people who do not impose impossible biblical standards on others when we KNOW FOR A FACT we cannot follow it ourselves. As Christians the ONLY person we are supposed to follow is Jesus. Only Christ is absolute. Christ IS the THE word John 1:14.  To worship ANY OTHER THING as the word of God is idolatry.Fundamentalists insist we need to follow Paul's suggestions as if they were GOD'S LAWS. But do they follow Paul in ALL things? They gloss over the fact that Paul also condoned slavery in Titus 2:9-10 and Ephesians 6:5 and believed women should not teach or have authority over a man in 1Corinthians 14:34-35 and 1 Timothy 2:11-15. Do these sects also follow this? Many of them don't.  

 

The truth is, we are not Paulians, we are Christians. Paul was just a human sinner like you and me, expressing his own feelings on spiritual matters. Paul and his writings are no different than any human priest or pastor today writing today. And just like today, even back then not all apostles agreed with Paul. Peter often disagreed with Paul’s approach and writings, calling them “Difficult to understand” and contain things which the “unlearned and unstable” preoccupy themselves with. See 2 Peter 3:16. IF Peter can disagree with Paul on certain matters and not take everything he said literally, so to can ANY CHRISTIAN. Even PAUL HIMSELF said in Romans 14:5 “Let every man be fully persuaded in his own mind.” In other words, USE YOUR BRAIN and THINK FOR YOURSELF.   

 

The ONLY figure ANY Christian needs to follow is Christ.  

  • Did Jesus say we need to follow anyone's bible writingis to get eternal life? No. What did he say?  See Luke 10:25-37. 
  • What is the ONE commandment Christ ever demanded we follow the one that is the GREATEST and fullfills the ENTIRE LAW and PROPHETS? See: Matthew 7:12.
  • Which sin did Christ say is 100% UNFORGIVABLE. Is it having gay sex?-- See (Matt. 12: 31)
  • How is it supposed to FEEL when you are a Christian? Burdensome and self-defeating or liberating and joyful? See Mathew 11:28-30.

If your Christian sect is NOT teaching this as THE CORE of its doctrine and they are placing OTHER burdens or rules on you as Jesus warned some would Matthew 23:4, then they are nothing but Pharisees in disguise. If you are gay and in a sect that is causing you to experience self-hatred, suicidal thoughts, rejection, isolation, etc. then you are not in a religious sect that is following Christ but their OWN fundamentalist agenda.  

I enjoyed your post thoroughly! 

 

Message Emote
blank
October 20, 2005, 5:18 pm PDT

I agree with Most Of This But

Quote From: openmind1

You are either homosexual, heterosexual or bi-sexual. These are not choices but inherent psycho-sexual traits. The vast MAJORITY of medical professionals and mainstream research agrees that this trait is determined VERY early in a child's development, possibly even before birth and it does have a strong biological component to it. 

  

Dr. Phil also stated this on MANY occasions on his shows and he represents what the recognized and professional mainstream scientists have to say on the matter. For more information you can go to objective, mainstream sties like the American Psychological Association www.apa.org for information. Just search, "Homosexuality". 

  

During the show Dr. Phil made a CLEAR distinction between homosexual ORIENTATION and homosexual BEHAVIOR. There is of yet NO emperical and conclusive evidence that ANY therapy programme has changed an independently confirmed homosexual into a indepenedently confirmed heterosexual.  All these ex-gay programmes do is try to change BEHAVIOR. Most people who identify as ex-gay say that they STILL are attracted to people of the same sex, they just do not act on it, this even applies to those who now display heterosexual behavior. As a straight person think of it in the REVERSE. Imagine you have to ACT GAY but you are still instinctively attracted to the opposite sex. 

  

Being gay is not a behavior. It is not a lifetyle choice. There is no ONE behavior that determines whether someone is gay or not. You can be gay and celibate, gay and a virgin, gay and married to someone of the opposite sex, gay and single, gay and promiscuous, gay and in a monogamous committed relationship with someone of the same sex etc. Having sex with people of the same gender does not necessarily mean you are a homosexual. Lots of STRAIGHT people engage in homosexual sex for many reasons- money (as in porn stars or prostitutes) or in prison (desperation or survival). It does not mean they are gay. WHY? Because this is NOT THEIR INHERENT SEXUAL ORIENTATION. Under normal circumstances they would instinctively be attracted to people of the opposite sex.  

  

So what makes a gay person gay? Simple. Their natural inclination is to be instinctively attracted to people of the same sex NOT the opposite sex. As my gay male friend would put it, "Halle Berry herself could strip naked and give me a lapdance and NOTHING will be happening.". They simply DO NOT FEEL ANYTHING SEXUAL FOR THE OPPOSITE SEX  just as we who are straight simply DO NOT FEEL ANYTHING for people of the same sex. I know cannot help being straight. It was not a choice, it just comes naturally to me, if I were to force myself to be with someone of the same sex it would gross me out and feel unnatural. For gay people, it is the opposite and people should try to show a little bit more empathy and understanding instead of spouting nonsense just because it sounds good to them. 

Regarding the part about men in prison.  There was a very good dissertation on the Web (I can't remember the location) but if you plug in the phrase "Repressed Homosexuality" in Google, you might find it.  That's how I originally found it.  It was written by a psychiatrist from Calgary, CA. 

  

What I can remember of it.  He points out the strong correlation between men who abuse/beat the women that they're having sex with and repressed homosexuality.  These are the same men who engage in violent rape and gang rape against other men while in prison.  These men, for the most part, really are homosexual.  They will never identify as such.  Additionally, men who engage in the gang rape of women are really engaging in homosexuality with each other, the woman merely serving as a common receptacle for their homosexual union.  They regard the "sexual objects" they use as  "bitches" - whether in prison or on free-side,   They hate anything feminine, which is why they use and beat anything they regard as feminine -  women, or weaker men that they can control.    

  

These men clearly have orgasms and enjoy having sex with other men, as long as they remain in the active (the top) role, so that they can maintain the illusion that they are "straight."  The desperation ploy is just an excuse.  Of course the ones who are the "victims" of the rape - and it IS usually rape - are probably the only ones who are heterosexual.  They are just perceived otherwise because they can't fight off the repressed homosexual bullies/abusers. 

 
User Mood
Mellow

Message Emote
blank
October 20, 2005, 5:20 pm PDT

10/19 "I'm Gay, OK?"

Quote From: cijaym

Wow!! You sure must know a lot of people to claim you know ALL homosexuals AND their agendae! I'll let you go now, you must be hecka' busy knowing so many people. 

  

By the way "all" homosexuals do not have that agenda, you're wrong. I don't care how you justify that comment, you have removed all credibility in your entire post by claiming you know all homosexuals.  

Yes, what WAS she thinking about? I have not ever met this woman.  

  

My agenda is (and I am a lesbian btw) to have fun with my adult children, be a great grandmother to four really cute kids, to love my g/f with all my heart and soul, to make her happy, to take care of my pets and my home and to enjoy my friends too. To the other gay people on this board, what's your agenda? *smiling* 

 
User Mood
Excited

Message Emote
blank
October 20, 2005, 5:29 pm PDT

the scholarship

 Because of this, God gave them over to shameful lusts. Even their women exchanged natural (physin) relations for unnatural (para physin) ones. In the same way the men also abandoned natural (physin) relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another.
Romans 1:26

In the preceding passage the Greek words physin and paraphysin have been translated to mean natural and unnatural respectively. Contrary to popular belief, the word paraphysin does not mean "to go against the laws of nature", but rather implies action which is uncharacteristic for that person. An example of the word paraphysin is used in Romans 11:24, where God acts in an uncharacteristic (paraphysin) way to accept the Gentiles. When the scripture is understood correctly, it seems to imply that it would be unnatural for heterosexuals to live as homosexuals, and for homosexuals to live as heterosexuals. 

  

porneia literally translates to fornication. Fornication is literally unmarried sex. The inclusion of homosexuality in its definition is self-serving and question begging. 

  

 
User Mood
Mellow

Message Emote
blank
October 20, 2005, 5:33 pm PDT

10/19 "I'm Gay, OK?"

Quote From: sboyd55

 

My niece has a strong sexual attraction for other women.  This is after 3 marriages (to men) and four children; she now lives with a woman. She says she did not choose to be this way, but she does love to advertise her sexuality, (an ‘in your face’ attitude) something she did not do when she was straight.

  

 

  

  

 

  

 

  

  

My neighbor has a strong sexual attraction for little boys.  He was married and has two children; he now lives in prison. I am sure he did not choose to be this way. Unfortunately, he did not advertise it.  

  

 

  

  

 

  

 

  

  

My nephew would rather have drugs and alcohol then a relationship of any kind with anyone.  He now lives in a stupor, in and out of jail, and on the streets. It is a very strong attraction. He (I guess jokingly) says, “God made me this way”, in an effort to deny responsible for his own actions.

  

 

  

  

 

  

 

  

  

 

  

 

  

  

All three of these people have intense attractions; they say they cannot resist acting on them. How can we approve of one and put the other two in jail? Another neighbor in another state beat his wife on a regular basis. He always said he was sorry and that ‘he couldn’t help it’. 

  

 

  

  

 

  

 

  

  

We all have things that tempt us, but if everyone gave in to every temptation, acted on every impulse and just did what ever we felt, ….well I would not want to live here.

  

 

  

  

 

  

 

  

  

 

  

 

  

  

How can any thinking person say it is OK to be a homosexual and act on it, but being a pedophile and acting on it, is not OK? Look it up in the dictionary, both are sexual ordinations: A predisposition in favor of something. I realize a three-year-old child cannot give consent, but if the person was born with that sexual predisposition in favor of small children, should we condemn him for acting on it?

  

 

  

  

 

  

 

  

  

The Word says, to take up your cross daily and follow Me.  We all have our crosses to bear, and no one can say theirs is more difficult then other peoples; therefore, we should excuse them for giving in.

  

 

  

  

 

  

 

  

  

Someone please tell me, if being born with some predilections makes it OK to act on them, then why not all of them?

  

 

  

  

I agree
 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
October 20, 2005, 5:41 pm PDT

10/19 "I'm Gay, OK?"

Quote From: mr_lion

My theory is - All humans are born potentially bi-sexual and yes, sexuality starts at birth.  The new born is sexual.  It is just not manifested in children the same way as during puberty, when the physical characteristics start to set in.   

  

Do NOT confuse sexuality with behavior.  I said children are sexual and do have sexual feelings.  I did not say that they necessarily act out in terms of what we would call "sexual acts."  Children may act out a sexual feeling in ways that we would not necessarily consider sexual.   

  

For instance, I know now that I felt sexual attraction in connection with males before I was 4 Yrs old. 

  

This is a true story:  I remember once when my 11 yr old male Cousin came to my house for a visit.  I owned a toddler's ride-about stuffed horse.  My prized possession!  My cousin took my horse away  from me and sat down on it very hard, bending the legs.  He was clearly too heavy for it and it was starting to break.  I remember being incredibly frustrated and crying at him to get off my horse  before he ruined it completely.  He remained on it bouncing and laughing.  While all this was happening, I can recall experiencing a sexual feeling, a kind of pleasure/frustration all at once, perhaps from seeing him straddling my horse.  There was absolutely no physical contact between us.  I believe an adult then came in and ordered him off the horse.  In any case, the legs were almost crushed..  Now to my 3 1/2 Yr old mind, all horses were male animals then.  I recall that after the visitors had left and I was alone in my room with the stuffed horse, I pulled my pants down and proceeded to piddle all over it, soaking and ruining the soft fabric.  I was probably punished, after all I was already potty trained, my parents having no idea why I did such a thing.  My thoroughly ruined horse was thrown out.   I definitely know now that my childish urination act was clearly, an act of masturbation.   It came about as a result of the powerlessness and frustration I felt about my prized toy, and the fact that it was ruined by another male.  The fact that the horse (in my mind) was male, probably had some significance too. 

  

I present that true scenario just as one example of how a toddler might act out his/her sexuality   And believe me, that act was definitely sexual.  I still remember it. 

  

As a Psychologist, I have been studying human sexuality for over 40 years.  I would suggest you read some of the works of Sigmund Freud regarding sexuality. 

  

BTW, nobody can choose to "fall in love."  Falling in love is quite involuntary and is a sexual manifestation.  One might fall in love with someone of the same sex.  Although falling in love is not love, it certainly is a prerequisite for starting a sexual relationship, that hopefully will lead to true love.  Otherwise, one might as well just have a platonic relationship with someone that is loved.  I'd suggest reading M. Scott Peck MD - "The Road Less Traveled"  for further explanations regarding what is love and what it is not love. 

Iwill also adress the message: 

"what you said was "so at that point the true for life sexual preference is developt"  

That isn't exactly saying it's not a choice. You clearly don't think orientation is set at birth. So how do these preferences suddenly manifest and why? " 

By rlanthier  

  

(OFF TOPIC) 

  

Well first things first In my post I treid to say that falling in love is NOT a choice I'm sorry if my choice of words wasn't proving my point. (that is why I wrote a "computer program" in a post or so earlier) 

  

The reason why I said that 4/5/6 years old didn't have that sexual tendency was because it was said on the forum and my earliest memory of that tendency was at seven in which I had a girl and in my memory the feeling I had then was different from the feeling from when I like a woman now. (I know only a year of difference but it can be a lot)  

  

and Maybe I was wrong to say that a four year old doesn't have sexual tendencies. But at birth is a bit to soon for me, a baby can't even reconize his own reflection as being himself untill the age of (6) months if I'm not mistaken. He doesn't even know what his feet and hands are, so I think that birth might be a bit to soon to believe for me. 

  

Then I do not think sexual preference just pops up, It will probably linger round for a longer time, but at the age of 16/17 years most come out, and some have had a girlfriend before aswell (side note: In the Netherlands it is a lesser deal to be gay, though I haven't checked with my friends, then in the US where you are almost condemmed to be gay) so I think that at that age a switch flicks and they at that point now or can interpret that they are gay. maybe I interpret it wrong and that they just want to tell it at that point. 

  

Then I agree with you saing we begin as bisexuals. In the Netherlands we have a Dr. Love (I know cheesy name) on a tv music channel. On this show people between 13-25 give or take discuss their sexual problem or insecurity and you see more then once that males and females ask I have a sexual fantasy about the same sex am I gay, so I think that that really supports your theory. 

  

then I shall also support my sexual expression timeline before I get any questions about that :) 

  

at the age of 10 children start talking about seks in a gigly kind of way: 

As a volunteer I work with children to keep them busy during one week of the summer holidays. I have had a group there with children roughly the age of 10. When speaking to them you will notice that they will interprit "anything they can" as sexual. Their sentances will often start with you said... hahaha... 

I also worked with a group where the children are roughly 9 years old and they did not show this behavior. 

  

they will form boy girl relationships at the age of twelve but in a gigly kind of way: 

This comes from when I was at that age, at this time I first remember that couples were first formed on a major bases (new couples forming every day it seemed). 

And yes I had a girl at the age of seven but then it wasn't at the same magnitude as at the age of twelve. 

seriously dating starts somewhere around 13 years in which french kissing is "being explored" 

again own experience. 

at the age of 16/17 teens are ready to have sex: 

I base this on the 2004 study by durex on sex experience worldwide though globally it stands on 17.7 years in both the US and the Netherlands this is sooner (16.9 & 16.4 resp)  

  

Thatis also why I think that sex education by the parents should not start later then the age of 12 because they openly express their curiosity at the age of 10 and education in schools should not start later then 13 years. Ow and when talking about it do not only speak about protection or the concequentions but also about the pleasures, it sticks better that way  

In countries with open sex education policy teen pregnacy is much lower then in countries without them. I do not have the results on a sheet but search on the internet there are loads of sites on the subject. 

  

I hope I made my point less open to suggestion and interpretation. and that I have clarified why I stand on the subject like I do. 

 

Message Emote
blank
October 20, 2005, 5:48 pm PDT

Point by Point

Quote From: sboyd55

 

My niece has a strong sexual attraction for other women.  This is after 3 marriages (to men) and four children; she now lives with a woman. She says she did not choose to be this way, but she does love to advertise her sexuality, (an ‘in your face’ attitude) something she did not do when she was straight.

  

 

  

  

 

  

 

  

  

My neighbor has a strong sexual attraction for little boys.  He was married and has two children; he now lives in prison. I am sure he did not choose to be this way. Unfortunately, he did not advertise it.  

  

 

  

  

 

  

 

  

  

My nephew would rather have drugs and alcohol then a relationship of any kind with anyone.  He now lives in a stupor, in and out of jail, and on the streets. It is a very strong attraction. He (I guess jokingly) says, “God made me this way”, in an effort to deny responsible for his own actions.

  

 

  

  

 

  

 

  

  

 

  

 

  

  

All three of these people have intense attractions; they say they cannot resist acting on them. How can we approve of one and put the other two in jail? Another neighbor in another state beat his wife on a regular basis. He always said he was sorry and that ‘he couldn’t help it’. 

  

 

  

  

 

  

 

  

  

We all have things that tempt us, but if everyone gave in to every temptation, acted on every impulse and just did what ever we felt, ….well I would not want to live here.

  

 

  

  

 

  

 

  

  

 

  

 

  

  

How can any thinking person say it is OK to be a homosexual and act on it, but being a pedophile and acting on it, is not OK? Look it up in the dictionary, both are sexual ordinations: A predisposition in favor of something. I realize a three-year-old child cannot give consent, but if the person was born with that sexual predisposition in favor of small children, should we condemn him for acting on it?

  

 

  

  

 

  

 

  

  

The Word says, to take up your cross daily and follow Me.  We all have our crosses to bear, and no one can say theirs is more difficult then other peoples; therefore, we should excuse them for giving in.

  

 

  

  

 

  

 

  

  

Someone please tell me, if being born with some predilections makes it OK to act on them, then why not all of them?

  

 

  

  

There's probably a reaction on the part of you Niece because of the "Forced Heterosexism" that she had to live under since before she could remember.  If her intent is love, then so be it.     

  

Your neighbor simply having the attraction is doing no harm.  If his intent was to harm, If he forced himself on boys against their will, that is abuse and he should be in prison.  Hurting a child or forcing oneself on anyone is unacceptable. 

  

Your nephew being on drugs and alcohol is only the symptom.  I would guess that your nephew is repressing his natural homosexuality and/or other emotions - the drugs and alcohol serve to numb out the true feelings. 

  

The neighbor in the other state is suppressing his homosexuality - the symptom?  Beating his wife.  He hates all women, all that is feminine.  He's a likely candidate to rape and beat men in prison as well. 

  

Perhaps you are suppressing something? 

  

You are obviously confused between consent and force (rape). 

  

Look to the WORD within your heart. 

  

As above, you seem to be asking this question because you are confused between consent and force - hurting someone.  When you act on an impulse that involves harming another soul, you incur negative karma.  

 

Message Emote
blank
October 20, 2005, 5:55 pm PDT

my exact words

Quote From: max_01

The question is ment to be, "When did you know that you were straight? When did you choose to be straight?" 

  

As a gay male, for as long as I can remember as a child, I wanted to be a girl. Why? Because girls marry boys.  

  

I remember, as an adolesent, choosing to be straight, haveing hompsexual thoughts, and replacing those thoughts with straight sex. Left me in constant conflict, internally, and ultimately, left many girls hurt and used. 

  

Love is someting that is found in one's heart and mind towards others.  

- If you are a man, and know and love your father, this does not make you gay, yet you know love for another man. 

- If you are a woman, and know and love your mother, then the same applies. 

  

The expression of love towards another person of the same sex seems to be what you do not fully understand. Please sepperate the sex act from the feelings for a moment and remember back to when you loved another person of the same sex. It comes from your heart, not your groin. 

  

Your choice on expressing your love on a physical level is a choice. As to whom and how. Be it a handshake, a kiss or hug, or sex. We all choose to whom and how we show our love.  

  

However, when it comes to physical sex, I can speek from the point of knowing when I chose to be straight, and have straight sex. Didn't work for me and I was not a happy person. Not a happy person for the internal struggle I felt and not happy for the "use-en and lose-em" pattern I saw happening because of the internal conflict. 

  

But once I came out and realized that I was lying to myself, I fell in love. :0 

I did seperate the "sex act from the feelings". Comparing the love you feel as a homosexual to the love you would feel towards your mother, sister, etc. is absurd. They are two completely different things--two completely different feelings. I do understand the expression of love towards one of the same sex. 

  

These were my exact words:  

  

"The love I cannot understand is the one that happens when woman loves woman and man loves man sexually"     (italics added) 

  

I have said in previous comments on this subject that I believe that feeling an attraction to the same gender does not make you a homosexual. Acting or engaging in sexual activity with the same sex is what makes you gay. Do I think a homosexual can completely change? No (homosexual: I am referring to a person who has ALREADY ACTED on their gay feelings). 

  

  

  

  

 
User Mood
Relaxed

Message Emote
blank
October 20, 2005, 5:57 pm PDT

10/19 "I'm Gay, OK?"

Quote From: judyblue22

Don't bother "coming out" to me, I'm just not interested.  When I watched the daughter talking to her sister and mother, I thought she was confronting them for reasons other than her sexual orientation or their acceptance of it.  There is some family history there that we didn't hear.  She seemed to be throwing her sex life in their face unnecessarily.  

  

I'm hetro but I still would never discuss my sexual relationship with anyone but the person I have sex with.  I'm sure my parents would rather stick needles in their eyes than hear about it and I feel the exact same about their sex life.  If someone in my family is homosexual, I would notice simply by virtue of the partners the person selected.  I wouldn't feel any need to talk about it at all and I would prefer not to.  

I hear what you're saying because I don't wish to share/hear sexual stories either and I'm totally with you with the daughter flaunting her sex life - and about the tension between them having nothing to do with her being a lesbian. There's bad feelings that go waayyyy back.  

  

I'd rather stick needles in MY eyes than have to listen to others' and what I do with whom is none of your business and I would NEVER saddle you with the stories. I only wish strangers on the bus and co-workers (all straight) would have that kind of consideration. Honestly if I had a dime for every stranger that told me about their sex life in situations like buses and planes where I've been trapped...I would be writing this from a condo in the tropics never having to work again! (Never had anyone in the GLBTA community tell me their stories though.) 

  

Coming out though isn't 'wagging' one's sex life in someone's face, though. That's like saying when straight people finally become sexually active, they run around grinding their rear ends into each other or that when a couple starts going out they're going to be throwing each other on the ground and doing it every ten seconds. 

  

The reason you don't need people coming out is because it's a non-issue to you. I know you don't care what my orientation is and we could have a fun chat over coffee, cry or laugh together at a movie and our orientations won't come up at all...so it'd be a non-issue between you and me. 

  

Value in coming out - Mostly, you're at peace with yourself and there are no more lies in regards to it. You learn who your friends are, you may even dispell misconceptions and prejudices in people. You also learn about those people who you THOUGHT loved you.  It keeps all the nosey-parker friends and relatives off your back as they parade their young single friends around you in hopes  that FINALLY you'll meet the 'right one'. (I'm 42...I realise that's not old but WHEN will some people realise that THEY'RE not the ones to pick the 'right one' because all they've served up is a bunch of dirty old men, gigolos and toads? Please, nobody tell me about your aunt Frieda who fell in love and lost her virginity at age 97 or I shall be forced to find out where you live, put Ex-lax in your food and steal all of your toilet paper.) 

  

So that's why it's important to some to come out. Very few people know about my orientation because they've never really asked and I don't find it important enough to tell them.  

 
User Mood
Relaxed

Message Emote
blank
October 20, 2005, 5:59 pm PDT

10/19 "I'm Gay, OK?"

Quote From: oet_gaol

You say:  

"Who am I to say that homosexuality is right, when God makes it pretty clear that it is not right? 

  

with that sentence you say I don't have to think about the issue. It was god's choice so I'll defend it. TAKE RESPONSIBILITY don't hide behind religion. 

  

About those stories yes they are older then judaïsm some date back to the times of babylon and the ancient egyptions.  

  

And about jesus those stories where actually written down centuries after he lived hence my story about the gossip  And to support this why is it told he lives around 0 AD while most scientist think he lived around 30 AD or how come that cristmas, the birth of christ falls together with a paigan fest (celebrating the return of the light if I'm not mistaken but could be wrong.) And that many christian fests fall together with a paigan celebration. It wasn't because it actually happened there but it was because they wanted to "kill" the paigan believe system. 

  

Yes but Can an entire world I ask (wether it is Judaïsm Islam or Cristianity) because whatever you believe the "others" have it wrong so they where in effect brainwashed by the devil or what you want to believe. 

  

And a holy book can be interpreted in many different ways so let's take a step back and look at the Koran for instance. In the koran it says woman should cover their body well no it says they should cover their hair mouth and nose well no it says they should cover their hair well no it says that women look better if they cover their hair and some say that even that cannot be read in the Koran so it's all about interpretation. 

  

In the netherlands there was a row within the church because a priest said that homosexuality was a disease. The other priests corrected him, in the Netherlands the priests say homosexuals do have a place in the world according to god. They also defend the use of condoms. So they just interprit the teksts differently and according to what the current modern society needs. 

  

And you ask sort of why I don't believe in god well for one i find my religion in adifferent form of religion wich doesn'tinvolve a god after life or what ever my reasons are simple. 

  

I was raised as a roman catholic yet as I grew up I saw that science has pretty much taken down many thruths in the bible. 

  

The vatican does not want to change it's view and erodes the bible even further 

  

I disagree with many of the vaticans views 

  

The vtican has been for centuries about might and money instead of god and you are all using the bible which has been kept by this institution for many centuries. 

  

I do not believe god would let us go ahead and kill his creation (global warming, extinction of species ect.) 

  

I do not believe I want to worship a god who does not settle the dispute on which religion is the true one 

  

I do not believe a god would let the distinction of rich and poor continue 

  

I do not believe a god tkaes away mothers and fathers from their young children. 

  

I rather believe that their isn't a god then to believe their is a cruel one. 

Yes, I share your views. 

I think that religion and its various intepretations have caused most if not all turmoils in the world. 

  

  

 
First | Prev | 84 | 85 | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 | 90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | Next | Last