Message Boards

Topic : 11/04 A Shopping Intervention

Number of Replies: 191
New Messages This Week: 0
Last Reply On:
Created on : Friday, October 28, 2005, 02:25:46 pm
Author : DrPhilBoard1

Are you living way beyond your means? Do you shop for one pair of shoes, but come home with 10 pairs? Bridgette is deep in debt and often spends $7,000 a week on luxury items. She even dropped $25,000 in one weekend! Her husband, Michael, says her shopping is an addiction that's ruining their marriage and family. Find out the one big secret that Bridgette's been keeping from him. Share your thoughts, join the discussion.

 

 

Find out what happened on the show.

 

More November 2005 Show Boards.


As of January, 2009, this message board will become "Read Only" and will be closed to further posting. Please join the NEW Dr. Phil Community to continue your discussions, personalize your message board experience, start a blog and meet new friends.


Message Emote
blank
November 15, 2005, 12:34 pm PST

11/04 A Shopping Intervention

Quote From: treetops

I think I can remember that.  350 degrees for 25 minutes.   I've done a lot of roasts-Good Ones and the kids ignore the veggies.  They do like those breakfast casseroles though.  I have a picky child who will not eat hot dogs.  He doesn't like them.  The rest of us do.  Lots of hot dogs are not good for any family.  We definitely can't be accused of eating too many though because we hardly ever eat them here because of the one child.  That is an easy meal though when one is about to collapse.  I just got a neat cookbook from a local lady.  There are lots of easy delcicious meal in it.  Heres to the simple life.      

  

What type ham do you use? 

  

I actually use back bacon - also called Canadian bacon, but it wouldn't matter what you choose.  Just cut it up in small strips or chunks.  

  

I understand about fussy kids-if it were up to me, I'd add green onions to that but it would cause a mass rebellion ~grin~ 

 
User Mood
Relaxed

Message Emote
blank
November 15, 2005, 2:03 pm PST

Everyone has a right to their own opinnion

Quote From: wildwood

most women look for certain qualities in a mate and a physical or emotional attraction is only one  or two of the things we consider.We also want a mate that is successfully employed or at the least able to support us and a family.   

   

**cough** speak for yourself!  I can chase goals and I am not an anomaly.  I and many other women are capable of supporting ourselves just fine.  I chose my husband because I loved him and he shared my values and principles.  

   

 Apparently I am confused, I assummed by your use of the termology "supporting ourselves" you were referring to your or any womens ability to make MONEY and somehow suggesting I wasn't aware that such is possible in this day and age. I really am getting curious about the defensive tone of your posts. I really did not intend to insult anyone or put down  women that make "other choices'. Please lets not make this about working women vs non working, nor about religious theology.  

  

This couple is having problems that really have nothing to do with money or who makes it , what they do with it or or why, unless you want to consider  their current  mode of faulty thinking that money is an equalizer in marriage. Intelligent people can reason that one out.  I do however, see that Micheal, in my opinion, is HIDING his "sins" on his marriage and family  behind his ability to earn lots of money, as if that exempts him from his other responsibilities and he has this "faulty thinking in common with lots of men. And his wife, is as guilty as he, or is following his lead and hiding her sins on the marriage,  with her now totally irresponsible use of this SAME money to "talk" to Micheal,  and she has lots of female company with falling into that "trap" and that neither one wants to admit that  "  behind the money tree "is where they are both hiding their irresponsibility and sins on the marriage and family unit. 

  

Clearly Micheal and Bridgette DO NOT at this point share the same values and principals, or if they do it has gotten lost in the pursuit of, power of and in the spending of  MONEY.  

  

I am stating my opinions about my  personal beliefs and interpretation of the bibilical plan for marriage. I assume that is what message boards are there for.   

  

The passage in the bible that spells out what I consider a "workable" plan for the marriage partnership has been debated for centuries, and each generation has put their spin on it according to the "times".  I do personally think, that the "wives submit to husbands" part has been taken out of its context, much to the determent of  ALL women, in a way that leaves it open to much  negative debate.  I am still not totally at ease with the sins that has led many men and  women who do not read any futher than that one sentenence to perpetrate on women kind.  

  

You simply cannot focus on that part, and "get it". Unfortunatly   individuals, and many churches and their teachings have done just that, and caused many "abused" women to suffer even more, while men get totally off the hook as to what they were "commanded" by God to do to EARN the submission of their wives. It simply DOES NOT say that women must submit irregardless of the false, ungodlike or fautly leadership on the part of their husbands.  

  

If a woman is being treated according to the principals laid out in this passage, she would WANT to submit to the GODLY leadership of her husband.  This plan for "teamwork"  would be good marriage advice, irregardless of anyone's religion. To each his own however and I totally respect that many women, including myself, chose to see  this as laying out a plan of a partnership of equality, cooperation and loving spirits ie "two people acting as one". Far too often, MONEY, enters the picture and all that "cooperation, mutuality, and equality is cast aside. Perhaps that is where the "money is the root of all evil" quotes come into being.  

  

This biblical passage, if interpeted correctly, DEMANDS cooperation and respect, mutual equality as as "one"  or as one would like or needs to be treated and it encourages loving treatment of each other. Far too many do not read, study, or understand the ENTIRE passage.  This is where the problems come from. I have gotten that a man leads his wife in a loving, respectful, equal, and fair way, as God should his people. His leadership, is contingent on his compliance with GODS way, and his deciding  "vote" only in the extremly rare cases (if the plan is followed) where he and his wife cannot  achieve mutuality, as a "tie breaker". Too many people do not see this is subject to his leadership as HE is instructed by God. This does not give him power over the women but power WITH the woman.   

  

Whether you know it or not, I would suspect you and your husband are following the principals laid out, correctly, and that is why you make such a good "team". Lucky you!  Many couples are not, and therefore problems develop where resistance of "power over", and superiority of  take precedence over TEAMWORK and JOINT mutual, and considerate problem solving.  

  

I want to add to my post that much of this is my personal speculation, as to the problems, cause, and so on. None of us KNOW what lurks in the hearts of this couple, in reality, once you get past the symptoms. I only hope they can work it out, and get back on the "same page" of loving respect and mutuality that so many of us have a hard time finding. 

  

  

I agree with your post(s). 

  

What really annoys me is the fact that some people don't seem to realise that everyone has a right to their own opinnion, this is a public debate, open to all regardless of gender, age  or profession. 

  

It is highly unfair that if someone does not agree with a post that they allow themselves to 'attack' the author and not the actual concept or idea that is at hand. 

  

As I have previously stated I agree with what you have said, and if your posts are read properly, it can be seen that there is nothing 'offensive' in them at all 

 
User Mood
Stressed

Message Emote
blank
November 15, 2005, 3:03 pm PST

Thanks, I agree totally

Thanks for your vote of support Niki pvn 

  

I really didn't mean to get into the religion thing, just spoke from MY firm belief that Micheal is not being a good leader or team player and has his own guilt in this deal.  

  

The poster who was finding offense is even more curious as in an earlier post of hers it was stated that she is part of a lawyer/phychologist marriage team or so I recall, and surely in those capacities BOTH would know this is a very common financial and psychological problem that creates a difficult cycle to end.  Maybe they do not specialize in these fields. Also in another post, she details how they too had some pretty severe financial problems and managed to come out of it.  

  

I totally respect her opinions, if not her offense or taking out of context certain statements of my posts. I just wish she would do the same, and then we wouldn't be he said she said to the point of monopolizing the boards.  

  

I used to feel very strongly about this  "I will earn my way in my marriage" or something akin to that philosophy " when I was very young (like in high school) as I saw many women lose all respect and power in their marriages due to "wage earner power over trips" on the part of the men. Said I would NEVER be there. Well life has a way of slapping you to your senses, or changing "nevers".  I  matured to realize, you don't have to be earning money to be earning your way in a marriage, especially one with small or underaged children involved. I think one of the reasons many children of wealthy families get into all sorts of trouble is the lack of "supervision" at home. This problem is not unique to the wealthy "unsupervised" children only just that the kids of the "rich" have more spending money with which to buy drugs, fast cars etc.  

  

I still maintain money should never be the equalizer or the indicator of who gets the  "power" or to rule in a marriage. Nor does this make the wage earner (be it man or woman) the "boss" and the non wage earner a non contributor, or a goldigger,. Thanks for your support 

 
User Mood
Stressed

Message Emote
blank
November 16, 2005, 12:01 am PST

Judyblue22

Judyblue22- regarding your last post -----DITTO
 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
November 16, 2005, 7:10 pm PST

Yum! Let's eat.

Quote From: judyblue22

I actually use back bacon - also called Canadian bacon, but it wouldn't matter what you choose.  Just cut it up in small strips or chunks.  

  

I understand about fussy kids-if it were up to me, I'd add green onions to that but it would cause a mass rebellion grin 

My picky son likes Canadian Bacon.  It is expensive down here.  I bought some country ham pieces today along with some chopped pieces of smoked ham too. I'm going to make your recipe this weekend. 

  

I found a wonderful recipe in that cookbook I mentioned.     It is for easy pork chops.    Just buy four boneless pork chops.  I bought four at the local Fresh Market.  They were thick.   I coated them in flour salt and pepper.  Then they are to be browned in olive oil on each side.  After that add four to five cans of french onion soup and simmer them for 2 to 2 and 1/2 hours covered.   The recipe said to buy Campbells soup but the store was out so I bought Progresso soup.  It was in a larger size about 18 oz so I used 3 cans.   Oh man!  I simmered those chops about 1 hour and they were out of this world.  I will definitely make that again.  It was so easy.  The soup creates a great gravy to pour over the chops and mashed potatos.   Yum. 

 
User Mood
Cheerful

Message Emote
blank
November 17, 2005, 6:01 am PST

Higher Prices for all....

Quote From: judyblue22

I would hope that there are some changes in that household where she no longer has the ability to spend money foolishly.  Without some family treatment and financial control, you are right -that family may as well just talk to the trustee in bankrupcy now. 

  

I don't feel too sorry for the stores. Stores have return policies because it encourages sales.  They expect some late returns and that was already factored into the purchase price. I would expect that these busnesses have made more than enough money off this family to be able to afford to accept back the items that are still unused. 

Stores have return policies because they want to build customer loyalty- when people return things promptly and in pristine condition, they can put them back on the shelf. When they are returned even a couple of weeks later, believe it or not, styles are in the process of changing and many stores write these sales off as a loss and return them to the parent company, where they are wholesaled out to "loss stores"- a lot of,if not many, things you buy on ebay come from these places- thats how they can sell a shirt marked $30 for $5. The company declares it a loss, the saleperson loses the commission, and someone down the line makes a few bucks off it- instead of another shopper seeing the item on the shelf and buying it at full price. Those potential losses are figured into prices which we all wind up paying, similar to shoplifting.  So, think twice before you make that purchase if you are just shopping for fun. (Legitimate returns, of course, are another issue- store owners want you to be loyal to them and they are happy to make you happy.)
 

Message Emote
blank
November 17, 2005, 9:17 am PST

11/04 A Shopping Intervention

Quote From: treetops

My picky son likes Canadian Bacon.  It is expensive down here.  I bought some country ham pieces today along with some chopped pieces of smoked ham too. I'm going to make your recipe this weekend. 

  

I found a wonderful recipe in that cookbook I mentioned.     It is for easy pork chops.    Just buy four boneless pork chops.  I bought four at the local Fresh Market.  They were thick.   I coated them in flour salt and pepper.  Then they are to be browned in olive oil on each side.  After that add four to five cans of french onion soup and simmer them for 2 to 2 and 1/2 hours covered.   The recipe said to buy Campbells soup but the store was out so I bought Progresso soup.  It was in a larger size about 18 oz so I used 3 cans.   Oh man!  I simmered those chops about 1 hour and they were out of this world.  I will definitely make that again.  It was so easy.  The soup creates a great gravy to pour over the chops and mashed potatos.   Yum. 

That sounds great, and something we can do and still play with the kids-bonus!  

  

But I hope more people actually think about what they do on the Lord's Day.  If no one went to resaurants and stores on Sunday, they would close on Sunday.  Most people could return to having one day each week when families could be together.  With a little planning, there is really no need to patronize a store or other non-essential service on a Sunday.  I know there are hospitals and utilities etc that can't close, but the rest of the world could obey God and have a day of rest.  

 

Message Emote
blank
November 17, 2005, 11:41 am PST

11/04 A Shopping Intervention

Quote From: wildwood

Judyblue22- regarding your last post -----DITTO
Smile-great! I hope the recipe works well for you too :)
 
User Mood
Stressed

Message Emote
blank
November 18, 2005, 4:46 am PST

Where are the "rules"? Where am I?

  I tried many times to get registered for this board as I truly enjoy Dr. Phil's shows for the most part. I think he is providing a great service for men and women everywhere.  Thought it might be fun to have "intelligent" exchanges with other viewers about the "psychology" involved.  What with my slow computer, and my uncanny nack for picking a password that is hard to registar, it took a while.  

  

I have two questions, "Are people here allowed to be so rude to each other here, and do they enjoy that and "nickpicking" other posters more than having "discussions" about the SHOW ?",  and Aren't there some guidelines for this board or something prohibiting "personal" attacks on posters? 

  

And , is this a recipe swap board or a board to "talk about the show?" 

  

Just wondering 

 
User Mood
Relaxed

Message Emote
blank
November 19, 2005, 5:46 pm PST

recipe swap.........

Quote From: wildwood

  I tried many times to get registered for this board as I truly enjoy Dr. Phil's shows for the most part. I think he is providing a great service for men and women everywhere.  Thought it might be fun to have "intelligent" exchanges with other viewers about the "psychology" involved.  What with my slow computer, and my uncanny nack for picking a password that is hard to registar, it took a while.  

  

I have two questions, "Are people here allowed to be so rude to each other here, and do they enjoy that and "nickpicking" other posters more than having "discussions" about the SHOW ?",  and Aren't there some guidelines for this board or something prohibiting "personal" attacks on posters? 

  

And , is this a recipe swap board or a board to "talk about the show?" 

  

Just wondering 

Yes, I think for most people 'guidelines' are set by the person that is posting,  I think that this is a great board where alot of  good advice,  and different views can be read.  

  

I find that sometimes a debate can get 'heated', and usually common sense will be enough for a person who does not agree with someones view to 'attack' the idea/topic, etc and not launch a barrage of  insults on the person behind the post.  As you see with some people that doesn't work because they have that attitude " My views are always right, and you have no idea"!, and if they still feel that they haven't been convincing enough thats when the rubbish like " I'm a lawyer, etc, so I am right and you know nothing"! 

Yeah, you are so right,  simply don't let it bother you.  When people start to constantly give aggresive answers and need to throw in their profession then that should tell you enough about the person..........    I have a very challenging, rewarding occupation which has taken me to all corners of the world, so does that make me the 'know all of mankind', absolutely not!, my point is that occupation and whatever else has little relevance in debates like these, because many people through their own life experiences have many things to offer here, I have read many things on this board which have made me perhaps look at certain topics in a different light or given me things to think about,  and I respect alot of what is said even if I don't always happen to agree with them, but everyone has a right to their opinnion and in turn not to be degraded or ridiculed for it. 

  

I also agree, that sometimes it is hard to log on,  only to find that some people use these boards as 'personal chat lines' that have nothing to do with the topic at hand, and as for recipe swapping I'm sure that there are many boards which are associated with cooking and perhaps they could go there, instead of wasting other peoples time and space on things that have nothing to do with the topic that I or someone else has logged onto. 

  

Keep posting, and keep your opinnions coming! 

  

  

  

 
First | Prev | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | Next | Last