Message Boards

Topic : 03/31 Love Smart, Part 1

Number of Replies: 209
New Messages This Week: 0
Last Reply On:
Created on : Friday, December 02, 2005, 03:45:39 pm
Author : DrPhilBoard1

(Original Air Date: 12/06/05) It's Dr. Phil after dark! Dr. Phil is having a champagne party - with an audience full of single men and women looking to meet Mr. and Ms. Right. Using his new book, Love Smart: Find the One You Want - Fix the One You Got, Dr. Phil teaches these singles how to be smart when it comes to love and relationships, and how to "bag 'em, tag 'em and take 'em home!" Noelle says she's a horrible dater and never gets called back for date number two. Dr. Phil sends her out with a man and critiques her technique. How is she sending the wrong message? Then, a beauty queen who never thought she would still be single at 37 says her biological clock is "gonging!" Does this mean she'll put up with just about anything? Dr. Phil puts her to the test. And, three single women who are looking for love in all the wrong places want Dr. Phil to help them find Mr. Right. See what happens when they participate in revolving dates while Dr. Phil coaches them through an earpiece. Whether you can't find a good candidate, can't close the deal, or get them home and realize they aren't who you thought they were -- you are about to earn your black belt in relationships! Talk about the show here.


Find out what happened on the show.

 

More March 2006 Show Boards.


As of January, 2009, this message board will become "Read Only" and will be closed to further posting. Please join the NEW Dr. Phil Community to continue your discussions, personalize your message board experience, start a blog and meet new friends.

User Mood
Relaxed

Message Emote
blank
December 14, 2005, 3:53 am PST

Much Ado About Nothing

I have noticed very few people pay attention to the "current events" message board. While we are here trying to figure out what makes the opposite sex tick, our nation is being sent to hell in a hand basket by a minority of politicians and fundamentalists whose views differ very little from the "terrorists" they are allegedly protecting us from. They would see us living back in the dark ages, where they would be allowed to rule with impunity and strip us of our dignity and basic human rights. These people are far more dangerous to America and what it stands for than the "terrorists" they have hiding in every closet. Their motivation is far from noble. It is personal greed for wealth and power. Hitler had the Jews to distract the public from his evil designs, this administration has the "terrorists". For more information,  visit this blog and post your thoughts and comments: http://wewillstopthisbull.blogspot.com/2005/12/these-people-are-running-our.html   Now, back to woman/man bashing: I failed to mention I am attracted to intelligent women in my own age group (51 today). Someone will no doubt find something negative to say about that! 
 
User Mood
Relaxed

Message Emote
blank
December 14, 2005, 1:01 pm PST

12/06 Love Smart, Part 1

Quote From: juliebgg

So that is the context of my conversations?? No, they are more likely to be about interests such as travelling, NCAA basketball (great game today, Duke!) current events etc. As a matter of fact I am married and happily a long long time.  So maybe I AM knowledgeable about what guys like. My guy would not be interested in conversing with an "I was like.." type of girl. They may be nice to look at (as are young guys),  but he goes much deeper than that and values intelligence, having fun, a loyal partner etc. He even says he'd be bored out of his mind talking about Britney and whatever else that generation is in to. It is not about money or looks; it is about love and respect.   

And as far as comparing anyine to Jennifer, don't you guys know yet that those covergirl pictures are airbrushed?  Compare the magazine ones to her candids..you wouldn't look twice at the latter. 

So i don't hate your gender but I do think people of both genders who just go for looks are shallow and are missing out on better things. 

You say "So maybe I AM knowledgeable about what guys like." At the very least, a huge overstatement. At best, you're knowledgeable about what _your_ guy likes. And as for your guy not being interested in conversing with an "I was like..." type of girl, many guys (and maybe even your guy) wouldn't enjoy it but, given the alternative of talking to someone who's hostile towards them, would it preferable. 

  

As far as "Jennifer" goes, you obviously missed the point - or perhaps got the point but don't want to admit that I'm right. Aniston vs White: candids or covergirl photos, in person or on TV, the younger is more physically attractive than the older. 

  

As for your final sentence, I think if you'd been as inclusive in your earlier condemnations you might have sounded less hostile towards men.  

 
User Mood
Mellow

Message Emote
blank
December 14, 2005, 2:41 pm PST

knowledgeable....

Quote From: billvan

You say "So maybe I AM knowledgeable about what guys like." At the very least, a huge overstatement. At best, you're knowledgeable about what _your_ guy likes. And as for your guy not being interested in conversing with an "I was like..." type of girl, many guys (and maybe even your guy) wouldn't enjoy it but, given the alternative of talking to someone who's hostile towards them, would it preferable. 

  

As far as "Jennifer" goes, you obviously missed the point - or perhaps got the point but don't want to admit that I'm right. Aniston vs White: candids or covergirl photos, in person or on TV, the younger is more physically attractive than the older. 

  

As for your final sentence, I think if you'd been as inclusive in your earlier condemnations you might have sounded less hostile towards men.  

Knowledgeable about what my guy likes........at the end of the day that is all that really matters. Having that one person in my life who is loving and respectful, atttentive, intelligent, full of depth, has many interests, a sense of humor as well as a sense of responsibility. Wouldn't trade it for the world!!!!  Hmmm,  and I wonder where poor Jen went wrong with all that "youth" going for her. 
 
User Mood
Mellow

Message Emote
blank
December 14, 2005, 3:55 pm PST

12/06 Love Smart, Part 1

Quote From: lilfran

I watched the show with interest, and there was one thing you didn't mention to the beauty queen who was 37 and still unmarried. Isn't it time she quit keeping her awards, crown, etc. in the living room for all to see?Maybe if she didn't mention that aspect of her "resume," the fellows would not either be intimidated, or interested in her only as a trophy date! 

Many years ago, my cousin, an RCAF pilot, was waiting for his girl friend in her living room. Seeing a fat velvet-covered album on the shelf, he looked at it and found it full of medals. Included was a silver diving medal in the Olympics! When asked why she hadn't mentioned it, she said she wanted people to be interested in her, not her medals. I thought that was a wise attitude. 

She is who she is.  Why should she apologize for it?  I think men probably ASSUME she has a boyfriend or is married.  And it has nothing to do with that. 
 
User Mood
Mellow

Message Emote
blank
December 14, 2005, 4:04 pm PST

Jen

Quote From: juliebgg

Knowledgeable about what my guy likes........at the end of the day that is all that really matters. Having that one person in my life who is loving and respectful, atttentive, intelligent, full of depth, has many interests, a sense of humor as well as a sense of responsibility. Wouldn't trade it for the world!!!!  Hmmm,  and I wonder where poor Jen went wrong with all that "youth" going for her. 
I think Jen is a very nice person.  I feel really bad for her because she doesn't deserve what she is going thru.  What is so weird is EVERY picture that you see Brad and Jen together they look soooo happy.  I mean to me he doesn't look happy in his photos with Angelina.  Again what's done is done.  And I don't want to judge the future.... but just looking at the cover that's what comes accross.    It's not all about looks.  If you read some of the articles..... it talks about some of the details not related at all to looks. 
 
User Mood
Mellow

Message Emote
blank
December 14, 2005, 7:27 pm PST

hi missjane

Quote From: missjane2

I think Jen is a very nice person.  I feel really bad for her because she doesn't deserve what she is going thru.  What is so weird is EVERY picture that you see Brad and Jen together they look soooo happy.  I mean to me he doesn't look happy in his photos with Angelina.  Again what's done is done.  And I don't want to judge the future.... but just looking at the cover that's what comes accross.    It's not all about looks.  If you read some of the articles..... it talks about some of the details not related at all to looks. 

Hi, misssjane.  My reference about Jen was not so much a personal one, as to make a point to the writer I was responding to.  I don't know whether or not Jen is a nice person or who was at fault with the breakup.  I don't think we can always go by what we see in pictures as people will often put on a public face, especially in Hollywood. They could have been trying to keep up their image as "golden couple" while who knows what was really happening. We have no idea what goes on behind closed doors.   

The point I was making was to someone who seems to think that looks and youth are everything in a relationship and that other qualities are only secondary. The point I was making is  that  looks and youth alone are not enough to hold a relationship together. As someone who is in a long term marriage, I value things such as loyalty, a good sense of humor, intelligence, shared interests, respect, love..you get the picture.  These are some of  the traits that  are part of my marriage which has been a success and has lasted many many years. I get the idea that the writer I was responding to is having difficulties with relationships.  I'd run for the hills real fast from someone who places such low value on older women.  Even if I was a 20 something I'd be wary that I would be a disposable commodity once I got older. Perhaps these are the vibes this person sends out and why would any girl want that? There was also alot of hostility and negativism in that writer's posts. Yes, the ladies must be running for the hills!! 

Anyway, back to Jen...if she is as wonderful and nice as you say, perhaps she will have a brighter future with someone else soon. 

 
User Mood
Mellow

Message Emote
blank
December 15, 2005, 4:15 am PST

refreshing

Quote From: wespauley

I have noticed very few people pay attention to the "current events" message board. While we are here trying to figure out what makes the opposite sex tick, our nation is being sent to hell in a hand basket by a minority of politicians and fundamentalists whose views differ very little from the "terrorists" they are allegedly protecting us from. They would see us living back in the dark ages, where they would be allowed to rule with impunity and strip us of our dignity and basic human rights. These people are far more dangerous to America and what it stands for than the "terrorists" they have hiding in every closet. Their motivation is far from noble. It is personal greed for wealth and power. Hitler had the Jews to distract the public from his evil designs, this administration has the "terrorists". For more information,  visit this blog and post your thoughts and comments: http://wewillstopthisbull.blogspot.com/2005/12/these-people-are-running-our.html   Now, back to woman/man bashing: I failed to mention I am attracted to intelligent women in my own age group (51 today). Someone will no doubt find something negative to say about that! 
Refreshing to see someone who values intelligence and the middle aged woman. (Nothing negative about that! It shows maturity and good values.)  Happy Birthday.
 
User Mood
Relaxed

Message Emote
blank
December 29, 2005, 3:36 pm PST

Well done

Quote From: juliebgg

Hi, misssjane.  My reference about Jen was not so much a personal one, as to make a point to the writer I was responding to.  I don't know whether or not Jen is a nice person or who was at fault with the breakup.  I don't think we can always go by what we see in pictures as people will often put on a public face, especially in Hollywood. They could have been trying to keep up their image as "golden couple" while who knows what was really happening. We have no idea what goes on behind closed doors.   

The point I was making was to someone who seems to think that looks and youth are everything in a relationship and that other qualities are only secondary. The point I was making is  that  looks and youth alone are not enough to hold a relationship together. As someone who is in a long term marriage, I value things such as loyalty, a good sense of humor, intelligence, shared interests, respect, love..you get the picture.  These are some of  the traits that  are part of my marriage which has been a success and has lasted many many years. I get the idea that the writer I was responding to is having difficulties with relationships.  I'd run for the hills real fast from someone who places such low value on older women.  Even if I was a 20 something I'd be wary that I would be a disposable commodity once I got older. Perhaps these are the vibes this person sends out and why would any girl want that? There was also alot of hostility and negativism in that writer's posts. Yes, the ladies must be running for the hills!! 

Anyway, back to Jen...if she is as wonderful and nice as you say, perhaps she will have a brighter future with someone else soon. 

As for "Jen", you say your reference about her "was not so much a personal one". No, it's just that you tried to use someone's personal misfortune and sadness for your own benefit. Well done. 

  

You say I'm "someone who seems to think that looks and youth are everything in a relationship and that other qualities are only secondary." Again, you've either missed the point or are simply trying to avoid it in order to avoid admitting that your "argument" doesn't hold water. 

  

"I get the idea that the writer I was responding to is having difficulties with relationships."  As you know nothing about me or my relationships, this is nothing but a sad attempt to bolster your argument by insulting me. Should we read from your postings that you're upset that you're older and that you feel less attractive? 

  

"I'd run for the hills real fast from someone who places such low value on older women." Again, a gross misrepresentation of what I've said. But then I guess I'd run for the hills from someone who is so willing to misrepresent the statements of others and resort to insults. 

  

"Perhaps these are the vibes this person sends out and why would any girl want that?"  You don't know what "vibes" I "send out", other than my replies to you - and even that's questionable, as it seems you can't really comprehend what I've written. Another sad attempt to bolster your argument by insulting me.  

  

"There was also alot of hostility and negativism in that writer's posts." The hostility and negativism started with your earlier comments to other people who've posted on this board. My comments to you have been forthright without being either hostile or negative - unlike your comments have been. 

  

"Yes, the ladies must be running for the hills!!"  Yet another sad attempt to bolster your argument by insulting me. What's that now, 3? 

  

When all is said and done, you've simply regressed to personal insults. Again, well done.  

 
User Mood
Mellow

Message Emote
blank
December 30, 2005, 3:44 am PST

not worthy

Quote From: billvan

As for "Jen", you say your reference about her "was not so much a personal one". No, it's just that you tried to use someone's personal misfortune and sadness for your own benefit. Well done. 

  

You say I'm "someone who seems to think that looks and youth are everything in a relationship and that other qualities are only secondary." Again, you've either missed the point or are simply trying to avoid it in order to avoid admitting that your "argument" doesn't hold water. 

  

"I get the idea that the writer I was responding to is having difficulties with relationships."  As you know nothing about me or my relationships, this is nothing but a sad attempt to bolster your argument by insulting me. Should we read from your postings that you're upset that you're older and that you feel less attractive? 

  

"I'd run for the hills real fast from someone who places such low value on older women." Again, a gross misrepresentation of what I've said. But then I guess I'd run for the hills from someone who is so willing to misrepresent the statements of others and resort to insults. 

  

"Perhaps these are the vibes this person sends out and why would any girl want that?"  You don't know what "vibes" I "send out", other than my replies to you - and even that's questionable, as it seems you can't really comprehend what I've written. Another sad attempt to bolster your argument by insulting me.  

  

"There was also alot of hostility and negativism in that writer's posts." The hostility and negativism started with your earlier comments to other people who've posted on this board. My comments to you have been forthright without being either hostile or negative - unlike your comments have been. 

  

"Yes, the ladies must be running for the hills!!"  Yet another sad attempt to bolster your argument by insulting me. What's that now, 3? 

  

When all is said and done, you've simply regressed to personal insults. Again, well done.  

this posting is not worthy of a response
 
User Mood
Relaxed

Message Emote
blank
December 30, 2005, 11:00 am PST

Cop-out

Quote From: juliebgg

this posting is not worthy of a response

Yet you respond nonetheless. 

 
First | Prev | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | Next | Last