Message Boards

Topic : 03/23 Nasty Custody Battles

Number of Replies: 814
New Messages This Week: 0
Last Reply On:
Created on : Friday, January 06, 2006, 01:41:19 pm
Author : DrPhilBoard1

(Original Air Date: 01/09/06) If you’re getting a divorce, or even considering one, and you have kids, don't miss this show! Dr. Phil talks to parents who are embroiled in bitter custody battles, leaving their innocent children caught in the crossfire. Scott is tired of fighting with his ex-wife, Tiffany, over visitation of their two sons. The bickering has gotten so bad that Tiffany claims Scott spit on her during a recent encounter. Can they learn to respect each other for the sake of their kids? Plus, Angela says her ex-husband, Chris's violent past and brushes with the law have her so scared that she refuses to let him near their 7-year-old daughter. Does a man with Chris’s past deserve a second chance to be a father? Share your thoughts.

 

Find out what happened on the show.

 

More March 2006 Show Boards.


As of January, 2009, this message board will become "Read Only" and will be closed to further posting. Please join the NEW Dr. Phil Community to continue your discussions, personalize your message board experience, start a blog and meet new friends.

User Mood
Cranky

Message Emote
blank
January 13, 2006, 2:27 pm PST

If it walks like a duck....

Quote From: judyblue22

There was nothing in the post by Ipewagoner that said that her daughter decieved anyone or that her daughter became pregnant on purpose. That was just a fact that you (rather insultingly) assumed.  You also assume that you know about my practice -lol-I don't do child support litigation-I'm a small town real estate/corp commericial/wills and estates lawyer.  

  

You know what they say about assumptions, don't you? 

  

  

I know that no one has "said" that the daughter became pregnant on purpose.. she however: 

was in a tenous relationship 

that she wanted to be more 

was having unprotected sex with a college student ( see also: probably has a future) 

His mom is outraged 

He says: it is not his 

she wants a cheque.. ( what a suprise) 

she wants him to take part ( she wants to change his life too) 

so.. it walks and talks like a duck 

  

The fact that you are a lawyer means your a part of the "fraternity" and all aspects of that groups earning ability are worthy of your protection. Just because you do real estate does not mean you dont view the billable hours created by other lawyers as worth of your protection and respect. 

Further the only time you have tried to distance yourself from providing an opinion on family law issues here.. is right now when you "think" you have made some minor point... try harder counsellor 

 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
January 13, 2006, 4:54 pm PST

There is hope

After watching this show I felt compelled to let you know of my situation.  I was in an abusive marriage and went through divorce.  At the time of my separation from my husband my kids were  6 mos and 6 years old.  Over the next 10  years it was basically hell.  My ex is an alcoholic.  It wasn't until he spent 2 years in prison that everything changed for the good. But while he was in prision I sought after full custody and was awarded it, (which I did without a lawyer).  When he was released from prison the only way he could see our children was through the Salvation Army supervised visitation program, which was what the court ordered when I was awared full custody.  Since he has been released he has done what the court has asked him to do, he has proven to me and our children that he has changed, and is rehabilitated,  and it has been so positive for our children to have their dad back.   

So I guess what I have to offer is that if your ex is in prision seek after all the help you can receive while he is locked up and when he gets out, hopefully you will have all your ducks in a row, to prevent him from causing any harm.  If he is changed, he will have to prove it.  

 
User Mood
Cranky

Message Emote
blank
January 13, 2006, 5:32 pm PST

again

Quote From: jewelerboy

You were "tricked" into custody??.. he "secretly won support"??... " no papers were ever served" humm you have to show proof of service in court unless you failed to let anybody ( including a legal aid lawyer) know where you were. If he had custody which you said he had.. he would be allowed to claim the various tax deductions and tax credit. You are 40% custodial.. so HE pays for their food and shelter as well as furnishing rooms, prescriptions, dentist, glasses.. and all you have to do is buy clothes and "extra's".. sounds like a good deal. 

He arrainged for the kids to stay at a girlfriends ( or ex g/f) .. so no.. it does not sound like abandonment.. it did not sound like abandonment to the judge either. When he called with a water problem he was not disclosing that to you  in order for you to imagine a way to abrogate the courts custody decision. I assume you enrolled them in a different school and did not get clearance to do that from the custodial parent.. if a man did this the woman would claim kidnapping in the courts. 

In answer to your question.. yep.. looks fair.. much worse than this happens to men every day 

Yes he secretely won support and I have showed proof in court to this matter.  His proof of service was mailing court documents through regular post. As well lied on Affidavits to the court on his income and mine, without showing proof.  Believe you me I have talked with lawyers about this.  He lied to the courts and said he too was staying at his ex g/f's with the children.  He if you read is not paying for their food clothing and shelter since he has managed to make himself and our children homeless.  And as for keeping them and registering them in school I made this decision based on talking with two lawyers and a children's aid social worker as well as a temporary order that says I am to return the children back to him and not his ex g/f.  You didn't read this very well.  Had I just up and decided not to return the children because I wanted to stick it to him then yes I would be at fault.  As it was a breach in a court order the children would not be returning to him I was actually within my full rights.  You also stated he pays for perscription glasses/drugs etc... Last I check that bill too was coming out of my pocket as well.  Not that I complain if the children need they get.  As well the last time I looked at my daughter she was  not wearing glasses because and I quote from her "dad is too lazy to pay 2 dollars to have the nose piece fixed"   As well there have been numerous times I have sent home special treats for the children that they have not been able to enjoy because him and his ex g/f had taken and eaten.  I have been on the man's part of the situation for years I know exactly what they go through and I sympathize.  it has cost me thousands in lawyers fee's numerous visits to the court house and even a few jobs due to time loss.  And last I checked if a child does not live with you, you are not entitled to the tax credits at least in canada.  If that were the case then he wouldn't have been fined by our government for claiming on a child that did not live with him.   

 
User Mood
Cranky

Message Emote
blank
January 13, 2006, 7:14 pm PST

thank you

Quote From: geneva457

Yes he secretely won support and I have showed proof in court to this matter.  His proof of service was mailing court documents through regular post. As well lied on Affidavits to the court on his income and mine, without showing proof.  Believe you me I have talked with lawyers about this.  He lied to the courts and said he too was staying at his ex g/f's with the children.  He if you read is not paying for their food clothing and shelter since he has managed to make himself and our children homeless.  And as for keeping them and registering them in school I made this decision based on talking with two lawyers and a children's aid social worker as well as a temporary order that says I am to return the children back to him and not his ex g/f.  You didn't read this very well.  Had I just up and decided not to return the children because I wanted to stick it to him then yes I would be at fault.  As it was a breach in a court order the children would not be returning to him I was actually within my full rights.  You also stated he pays for perscription glasses/drugs etc... Last I check that bill too was coming out of my pocket as well.  Not that I complain if the children need they get.  As well the last time I looked at my daughter she was  not wearing glasses because and I quote from her "dad is too lazy to pay 2 dollars to have the nose piece fixed"   As well there have been numerous times I have sent home special treats for the children that they have not been able to enjoy because him and his ex g/f had taken and eaten.  I have been on the man's part of the situation for years I know exactly what they go through and I sympathize.  it has cost me thousands in lawyers fee's numerous visits to the court house and even a few jobs due to time loss.  And last I checked if a child does not live with you, you are not entitled to the tax credits at least in canada.  If that were the case then he wouldn't have been fined by our government for claiming on a child that did not live with him.   

Since you are a lawyer you know that it is illegal to defraud the government.  Since you are a lawyer you are well versed in notice of service.  Last I checked sending affidavits by regular post to an assumed place of employment is not proper service.  And since you are versed in Canadian law you as well know it is illegal to defraud the government.  As well disclosing to your former spouse that there is a water problem ( the water main broke to the apartment house) and that you will not be able to move into the home as planned is not imagining a way to arbitrate a decision with the courts.  This man has already admitted in an affidavit to having three different apartments and chose to "temporarily" move the children in with a virtual stranger while he moved from couch to couch. He also admitted to the courts to leaving the children ages 11 and 10 alone for 13 plus hours over night without a sitter while he works, goes to the casino or the numerous other things he may do. This also constitutes child abandonment.  As well as a lawyer you should know that dropping you children off for weeks on end without anybody knowing where you are is concidered child abandonment.  And further more, as a judge deemed fit not to grant an emergency motion when I kept the children and enrolled them in school leads me to believe that the judge ruled that the children were fine where they were.   I have no problems supplying the extra's that my children need and no where in my origional post have I complained about that.  But I provide everything my children need from all of their clothing, shoes, food, allowances, travel, perscription drugs as well as glasses, and dental.  I have also provided them with a large enough home and property for them to grow.  This man has had his hydro, gas, as well as phone turned off on numerous occasions, and durring the course of our relationship managed to get us evicted from 10 different homes.  And now he has managed to get himself evicted, failed to provide a home for our children and severely lie to the courts. My whole point to the origional post was to show the mis justice in the court system when there is proven neglect.  You see when I filed my affidavit of alligations, and he replied he did not deny any of it.  The judge has still ruled thanks to the "status quo" As well when I found out that he "went behind my back" to gain support the affidavits and there were two of them he filed were lies to benifit him.  I have no problems ever supporting my children and when they are with me they are happy healthy and very well taken care of.   And since you are admittedly a real estate lawyer and not a family lawyer you should probably check facts first. 
 
User Mood
Stressed

Message Emote
blank
January 13, 2006, 7:20 pm PST

01/09 Nasty Custody Battles

Quote From: jewelerboy

If young men only knew how often this happened.. or how often one women suggest doing this to another. I was suprised at how often it happens.. and yes how often they "brag about it". Unfortunately if the courts were to hold even one responsible and deny her the support she was seeking.. or took away the child  the whole system would have to be revamped.  

holding men responsible when they are defrauded means that the courts never have to rule on any behavior leading up to conception affecting eligibility for support payments. Thanks for the wishes 

It all sort of makes me wonder why there is such a hold up with the "male" birth control pill.  That would take care of alot wouldn't it?   

It is such a shame that there are so many women that make decent women look bad!   

And people wonder why it is "so hard to find a nice guy"!   

  

It all boils down to the children suffering though.  I wish more people would put them first since they never asked for any of it. 

 
User Mood
Weird

Message Emote
surprised
January 13, 2006, 7:34 pm PST

Hmmmmm

Quote From: jewelerboy

Here is an interesting idea.. what would happen if we simply flipped a coin for custody, the winner gets the kids.. wheather they want them or not,  Think about this... guys would be faced with the possibility of being a full time dad with no help.. all the diapers all the laundry, all the parenting when they decided to do something  "divorcable".. further women would be faced with a 50/50 chance that leaving their husband meant losing the kids.. so no.. grabbing some DNA and running off with the kids and a cheque. Sure you could have visitation etc, but balancing the risks of divorcing hubby more farily might make some people work harder at their marriage.. or not enter a marriage until they were more sure of their maturity.
Interesting, good idea to a point, but again you make being a dad sound like some men would be unwilling to do the things that come naturally to being a good parent.  My ex used the "I do the laundry, keep house, etc" to "explain" how she loved me and put me first in the marriage.  My question still is, now the relationship is over has she stopped doing these most basic of tasks?  My opinion is that women, not men, are the immature ones when it comes to relationships being healed, take away their kids and eureka, they stay in the relationship.
 
User Mood
Stressed

Message Emote
upset
January 13, 2006, 7:41 pm PST

Irritated

I haven't read all of the posts, I will admit to that.  The majority I have read, however, sound like excuses for being rubes! 

  

 

Point is, the non-custodial parent is more than a checkbook and donor.  There are children involved and your feelings about your ex mean squat!  If the "other" parent is being abusive to the children that is one thing.  If the other parent is being abusive to you, well then too bad.  Suck it up and live with it.  That other person doesn't have to like you or like how you raise their children.  And yes, they are that other persons children.  Can I suggest that maybe you can get over yourself and get some self-esteem? 

  

 

I have been living with all of this for 13 years (being the custodial parent)!  Recently, I will admit, I have become the stepparent and have been experiencing the other side of the story for 7 years!  It is not pretty on either side and it sucks.  I have been through lawyers on both sides (and $25,000.00 later)!  I have been called daddy’s whore by his 7-year-old daughter; I have been told I do nothing by my ex's girlfriend.  It all hurts but I consider the source.  My I suggest you all do the same.  Like Dr. Phil said, how you poison your children may be sweet now but they will grow to resent you!

  

 

 

  

 

May I add that we don’t have room in jail for the real criminals, but we have room for “deadbeats”?  I have read that 75% of the “deadbeats” in jail have lost their jobs for one reason or another.  According to the courts, the reasons aren’t good enough.  I love how in this country the bad apples ruin it for everyone else.

  

 

 

  

 

One more gripe, please Dr. Phil, stop assuming the woman is always telling the truth.  It seems that you are always speaking down to the fathers for wanting to see their children or wanting to be part of their lives.  Please keep in mind that a scorned woman can be hell on earth (thank god there are pills for that!)  Also, please don't assume that all fathers want to be fathers.  Men do get tricked into fatherhood and so do women.  I want to keep this guy because he is wonderful and my ticket to a better life!  Well, welcome to 2006, thank god women can go to school and get and education and support themselves and also choose to go on birth control or insist on condoms.   

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
hopeful
January 13, 2006, 7:43 pm PST

See What I posted On "LIVING" on the edge

TC
 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
January 13, 2006, 7:49 pm PST

AS far as Discipline Only

Quote From: wuviee

I barely listened to the show, but hubby came home commenting on this particular episode,  

which was apparently on a co-worker's television.  

  

Could someone please clarify what Dr. Phil's intention was when he told the guests that 

a step parent has no business, no say in anything related to the child, that the parents and 

the parents alone should tend to the child? 

  

Please tell me hubby misunderstood Dr. Phil. I can't believe he would say something so bizarre. 

I'll delay making further comment in case hubs misunderstood. 

  

  

The Child will react to discipline from Natural Parents.. 

  

As far as Love, and everything else, that does not change.. 

  

Tc  John  

 
User Mood
Stressed

Message Emote
blank
January 13, 2006, 7:53 pm PST

01/09 Nasty Custody Battles

Quote From: robertofco

Interesting, good idea to a point, but again you make being a dad sound like some men would be unwilling to do the things that come naturally to being a good parent.  My ex used the "I do the laundry, keep house, etc" to "explain" how she loved me and put me first in the marriage.  My question still is, now the relationship is over has she stopped doing these most basic of tasks?  My opinion is that women, not men, are the immature ones when it comes to relationships being healed, take away their kids and eureka, they stay in the relationship.

Take away their kids.  Let me tell you what happens when the kids don't go to the mother.  It is a horrible thing.  It's like a kid in walmart wanting a toy they can't have!  God forbid the kids are doing well with their father.  Let him get involved with someone else and see what happens. 

  

 

It does not look good for the mother when she does not have custody.  People view her as having something wrong with her (even though that is the case).  They will dig and dig at the old wound until it becomes infected and oozing.  They will eventually win the kids back because that is how it works and you and your new life will be destroyed because revenge is sweet! 

  

 

If my ex was better for my daughter than me that is where she would be.  He is not however but I would never think to stop her from having a relationship with him.  She is at the age where she can decide for herself and she is choosing not to go because he and his family make her feel bad for loving me and they make her feel as if she is a second class citizen.  Her "nanna" makes her call her nanna because she is ashamed of her.  All of her other grandchildren call her grandma.  They will let her know all about it and yet all of this is still all my fault. 

  

 

I am just glad that we were civil enough towards on another when we split to have all of this ironed out before it was too late.  I can see where it could have got vindictive but it didn't, well at least until now. 

  

 

Like I said before, a lot of my fellow gender makes me embarrassed to be a woman.  They should all be ashamed of themselves, but please do not forget that there are good women out there that would not behave like that and find it appalling!

  

 

 

  

 

 
First | Prev | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | Next | Last