Message Boards

Topic : 03/23 Nasty Custody Battles

Number of Replies: 814
New Messages This Week: 0
Last Reply On:
Created on : Friday, January 06, 2006, 01:41:19 pm
Author : DrPhilBoard1

(Original Air Date: 01/09/06) If you’re getting a divorce, or even considering one, and you have kids, don't miss this show! Dr. Phil talks to parents who are embroiled in bitter custody battles, leaving their innocent children caught in the crossfire. Scott is tired of fighting with his ex-wife, Tiffany, over visitation of their two sons. The bickering has gotten so bad that Tiffany claims Scott spit on her during a recent encounter. Can they learn to respect each other for the sake of their kids? Plus, Angela says her ex-husband, Chris's violent past and brushes with the law have her so scared that she refuses to let him near their 7-year-old daughter. Does a man with Chris’s past deserve a second chance to be a father? Share your thoughts.

 

Find out what happened on the show.

 

More March 2006 Show Boards.


As of January, 2009, this message board will become "Read Only" and will be closed to further posting. Please join the NEW Dr. Phil Community to continue your discussions, personalize your message board experience, start a blog and meet new friends.

User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
January 9, 2006, 10:14 pm PST

90% of the time; kids should be with mom

  Unless there is real abuse, not games. 

  

Until the age of the kids, can make up there own mind.13-15.Most of the time  Men  want custody to hurt the ex. 

Ideally it would take both parents, 

 

Message Emote
blank
January 9, 2006, 10:16 pm PST

your statistics are..........

Quote From: catsagdn

Fathers are extremly important to a childs well being. Fathers according to much scientific research are far more important then mothers, contuary to popular belief, mothers are responsible for 70% of child murders and 80% of all child abuse cases, we should go back to the 1800's and demand that children belong to the father not the mother. who is with me?

  

  

BS............just plain BS    !!!!! 

  

  

Child Abuse.......Child sexual abuse.......child rape.......child murders.....the perpetrators are MEN. 

  

  

  

I'll try to look up and give the stats on that in the next couple of days. 

  

  

Where are all the fathers out there that abandon their children only to move on and make more with someone else?  

  

Where are all the fathers who don't pay child support? 

  

  

Where are all the fathers who live in the same house with their children and don't participate in their lives? 

  

  

 

Message Emote
blank
January 9, 2006, 10:33 pm PST

counseling for Chris

Quote From: queendva

As I sat there watching the segment with Chris and Angela, I began to wonder what kind of father did this woman think the man who was already abusing was going to be? I mean her exact words were "we got married in the midst of the confusion" and I'm thinking is this woman crazy or what! I think she needs to share some of the responsiblity of what has happened, she had a child with a meth using beer drinking evil man and now the one person who will and has suffered the most damage is this precious little darling that will without a doubt grow up looking for love in the wrong places and will proably end with a man just like this (I speak from experience) I wish these people (both men and woman!) need tho think of the long run and how making stupid decisions will efeect generations to come! I also hope that this father takes this tape home and takes a very good look @ how he cam off and how his actions may be very scary to an impressionable 7 year old. I think both these parents need counseling both together and apart so the healing can begin!!!!!!!!!! 

A batterer, abuser........should not be in any form of marriage counseling with his wife......this does not work.......in fact the abuser, batterer punishes the woman for what ever is said......and the woman does not have a safe place to discuss anything with the counselor with the batterer, abuser there. 

  

Chris needs counseling on his own. 

  

Counseling for his anger and hatred. 

  

Counseling for his Drug addictions. 

  

Counseling for his alcohol addiction. 

  

  

Batterers, Abusers could watch that tape a zillion times and still come away from it without insight or change...........they don't take responsibility for what they do.  

  

and when they pretend to........its to manipulate anyone they feel they need to. 

 
User Mood
Depressed

Message Emote
blank
January 9, 2006, 10:33 pm PST

y'all just don't get it!

                I hope you all can understand this message.  Sometimes there are no solutions and your child just has to grow up too fast anyway.  Mine has.  My son is eight years old.  His father and I were not getting along when we were married and we fought all the time.  I have two older children as well from a pryor marriage.  All my children had to endure the fighting.  So I divorced my exhusband with the idea that my children and myself would be better off.  I could get into detail the indignant things that went back and forth between the two of us for the last few years.  But we haven't got that kind of time.  But I was the one who had to watch what this all did to my son.  He hates it every bit of it.  To the point he has a script of what to say to each of us.  I realized  this a couple of years ago.  I have tried in every way to get along with my ex husband.  MY reward for this was a custody battle last year of where my son was taken away.  Did my son want to leave? NO!  Did he know why he was not being allowed back to mommys house. NO! When he did come to visit he told me he was being a very very good boy now and could he come home.  When I explained to him it was not about his behavior.  That it was mommy and daddys' behavior that would have to change you would have thought I kicked him.  The last visit he had was over Christmas break of where he counted down the days and when I asked him why he broke down and cried that he wanted to know how many days he had left because he did not want to go back. 

At this I tried to arrange a meeting between my exhusband, myself and our son.  He said he would get back to me on that.  When I called the next day, He was unavailable the rest of the day.  Now my son had to go back to his fathers.  Of course, My exhusband is perfectly satified to keep our son and I know the reason why.  M-O-N-E-Y.  My exhusband was over 2000.00 behind in child support before all this now he is not having to pay anyone.  But most of all he has not gotten our child a checkup physically or a dental checkup.  He is really not taking care of our son nor does he see what this is doing to our child.  I love my son so much.  And though I can not hardly bear to see him suffering this way I refuse to remove myself from this situation.  I feel like if I left this he would be lost.  I am the only one he truly talks to.  He says he is afraid to talk to his dad.  I can understand why.  He says he does not fit in with his stepsiblings.  Well here at my home he actually has siblings.  The treatment is different.   He is more comfortable with them because he has known them longer.  So what is my solution.  I can not fight this man monetarily because I don't have it.  I mean it costs a lot of money to keep going in and out of court and I have been yanked into court by this man on bogus charges just to get his child support lowered every year since our separation.  Mind you I have never once disagreed with lowering child support I do not believe in breaking anyone over money.  But I did not realize that these court visits were to diminish and humiliate me so that he could come with the doozy which was acquiring custody.  By this time all of my abilities of sustaining a court battle were gone.    Well to make a long story short  what solution do I have? 

NONE, other then help my son and support him when he is here after all God made me his mother for a reason.  The reason was to support him and see my son through this.  If I had a choice in this I could go back and do things very differantly from the gitgo.  But I have to deal with this now and so does my son.  And mind y'all out there if you are expecting answers from lawyers or sympathy in your case this will be your answer "YOU married the guy!"  well I know for now I will be wearing that around my neck for the next 10 years. Thanx for the relief.   

  

                                                                                Sad and Frustrated 

 
User Mood
Good

Message Emote
blank
January 9, 2006, 10:50 pm PST

Maybe you should watch the segment again

Quote From: fferkle

I realize there are quite a few jerks in this world - male and female. I do not dispute that you honestly believe what you are saying and that you believe it happened that way, in your experience. I don't have enough information to know what happened in your situation, one way or the other.

It is interesting that you saw the same thing I did and came to a completely different conclusion. How we viewed this situation is, most likely, the result of our experience.

I saw no objective evidence to substantiate anything Angel said about Chris. In my view, she was manipulative, dishonest and controlling. From my point of view, Chris' behavior was not anger, it was frustration at being unfairly prevented from seeing his child.

I respect, from your point of view, given your experience, that you did not see it that way. However, it is not up to the mother or the father to dictate, based on entirely subjective data, how the other must act before they are allowed access to their children. A child is never "her child" or "his child," it is "their child." And no one person has an exclusive monopoly on doing what is best for any child. Just because, in your case, your ex was abusive, et cetera does not mean that will be true in all cases.

Moreover, my posting was a call for OBJECTIVITY in the process. In a perfect world, both parents would be entirely objective in doing what was in the child's best interest, (and I would wager that, even if this were true, it would not necessarily make everyone happy). However we do not live in a perfect world, (in a perfect world these kinds of problems would never occur, because every marriage would be perfect), so we have to rely on an imperfect system - the law. And, as Aristotle said long ago, "The law is reason, free from passion," or, at least, that is what we should strive for.
Your idealism would be amusing if this situation were not so tragic. Did you miss the part where he laughed about murdering her cat? About nearly killing a man? If you honestly believe that Chris is being "unfairly prevented from seeing his daughter" you are not nearly as objective as you believe yourself to be, all philosophy 101 buzzwords and moral relativism aside.
 

Message Emote
blank
January 9, 2006, 10:56 pm PST

all wet........your post says alot ......

Quote From: hltibbs

Hey guys, let's look at what we saw of Angela on the show. She has given off the appearance of a mother who is scared to death of a man who only wants what is right. Did any one notice the shaking that Dr. Phil noted towards the end of the show? This shaking went to all the way to her head. I can tell the difference between actual fear and self-induced tremors. Why should she be afraid on national television? She has an audience (like Chris noted), guards all around the set and a number of other people there to protect her. His statement of her "always having an audience" makes me think that he was always subject to public humiliation. It doesn't matter who you are, you can only take so much of it. 

  

On the other hand, Chris does appear to have an anger management problem. As she has always had people in the background on the phone saying things in her behaqlf (whether they be right or wrong), it appears to me that the cards have been stacked against him for quite some time. I think that alone would give even the most calm type person an anger issue. I can't condone any unprovoked or even some provoked physical domestic violence in any shape or form, so let's get that straight. If one can walk away from a potential violent confrontation, I think that he or she should do so. During my own personal ordeal, my estranged wife had a man moved in and I know that he carried an assortment of knives and other weaponry on his person. I was able to walk away from a potential physical altercation and call the local authorities. It didn't do much good but I was able to avoid a potential violent confrontation. 

  

Otherwise, I have to agree with Dr. Phil's assessment. I think that Chris should stay in anger management counseling while at the same time having supervised visitatons. I also agree that Chris (once the counselor, in his(her) professional opinion thinks it is safe) should eventually have unsupervised visitations. 

  

Finally, I think it would be for the best that Chris and Angela should avoid any unncecessary contact. They should only communicate when it concerns the child. it falls back on my belief "if you can't get along - tolerate but if you can't tolerate - stay clear." 

  

I come from a similar situaton and I am the single parent in this one so I think I can speak from a bit of experience. 

  

That's just my two cents worth. 

about your thought process.......attitude toward women........and lack of understanding with regard to Domestic Violence.......Abuse.  

  

  

His anger does NOT come from  Angela..........his violence doesn't either. 

  

His anger does NOT come from the fact that he isn't seeing his daughter either. 

  

Those are NOT the reasons that he is abusive, violent, and very, very dangerous. 

  

  

Its damn well good that  Angela always  has someone around her.   Too bad she doesn't have a body guard , too. 

  

  

Why are you asking why she would be afraid on television....? 

  

 Think about his past actions. 

  

It doesn't seem that...... 

  

You have any  understanding of Domestic Abuse or Domestic Violence..........the dynamics. 

 
User Mood
Depressed

Message Emote
blank
January 9, 2006, 11:49 pm PST

the other side of the coin

All right I posted about my situation with my ex.  Now I will tell you about the other side of the coin.  My husband has two daughters by his first wife.  Those two girls have gone through pure hell. Why? Their mother.  All those who say mothers are altruistic and holy need to know that there are those who are not.  This women kept my husband from seeing his girls for seven years.  How?  By traveling state to state.  Was this because  of my husband? no.  Everytime a government agency or local police department would catch wind of how she was treating her children she would up and leave.  My husband in divorce court tried to show the kind of person she was to a judge and the judge saw it as irrelevant.    Well, his oldest  child (who he adopted at the age of 3months) has been subjected to neglect, drug abuse, physical abuse, mental abuse.  She has a bare grasp of values and is essentially a wild child.  She ran away from her mother, which took a lot of courage on her part considering the threats she heard growing up, then turned her mother in to the local authorities.  With that her and her sister were removed from their mothers "care" at that time.  This is where my husband steps in.  After years of wondering if he would ever have an opportunity to show his children what a good parent can be, he was finally believing he would have a chance to show his daughters the love they needed.  Well,  the mothers family decided different.  They fought for custody and won it.  What cost him custody? A state line.  Basically because he live 20miles into the next state well He was not qualified.  Now mind you the girls were also part of this as well.  They have been so convinced by their mother that he was a bad person, violent, crazy, so on and so forth,  that they were truly afraid of him.  Of course all the officials found that all the allegations the mother made were totally bogus.  But because the girls were teenagers and had a choice given them they chose to stay in what was comfortable which was the mothers family which I might add are not much better.  The oldest has since run away from her grandmothers 6 times in the last year.  The youngest has been put on 9 or more medications by several differant doctors.  Lets just say the court might as well have put them back with their mother.  After all where did she learn her behavior from?  The day after Christmas is when my husbands oldest daughter ran last and with a 19 year old man and she is only 14.  The mothers family did not inform him of this.  In fact it was not until he talked to his youngest daughter today that he found out.  Everyone wants to blame dads well it is just not that easy is it.  If you do not let a father be a participant in a childs life you are asking for your child to be lost.  There are real occasions for parents to be removed from a childs life.  But lets all be realistic in this country you can pretty much say anything about anyone and its true until  that person proves it is not and even then it will be held against them.  Dads sometimes don't have a chance.  My husband pays his child support regularly and has even when he did not see his girls for seven years.  The price he has paid, lack of self esteem, depression, hurt and anger.  I live with this person everyday and we now have a daughter of our own.  He puts all of his love that he has not been able to share with his other two daughters into her.  Mind you they see this but she is the one he truly feels he is allowed to love.  Is it fair? NO! Is it gonna get better? NO!  His daughters family will always continue to call and ask for money and then disappear all he is to them is a paycheck.  As a step mom  I love these girls,  I would love to give them a place in our home and some stability in their lives.  I want to give them what my two older children have.  My oldest children are products of what divorced parents should be.  My first ex husband and I are friends.  And we discuss the children quite often.  His wife is a wonderful person and they feel the same about my husband.  My older children feel secure that there is not only mom and dad but stepmom and stepdad and in this case makes their safety net a bit wider.  Believe me I have seen and lived all sides of this situation with what makes healthy children of divorce and what does not.  It takes two to argue just like it takes two or more to get along.  Its not just the parents it is the stepparents as well.  The benefits of letting go of the past and moving forward for the children and being the grown up in the situation are well worth the rewards!!!!  For all those parents argueing over who said what on what day and month and year discussing petty small indifferances that in the longrun don't mean a doggone bit of differance to their child.  Wake up!!  Its your childs life you are ruining by fighting not your ex.!!!!!  After all we all as parents decided to have children one way or another and the upshot of that decision was to be the adult for them because they do not have the abilities yet .  And our responsibility to them is to raise them to be adults in the proper time.   Just because we divorce does not give us a "lifetime pass" to  be a big baby and suck our thumbs.  Our children need us and it is time as a nation of people, Judges, authorities, parents and the like see that.  I sincerely hope that one day  our children can stop picking up the pieces of our lives and can stop having to carry them.  Dr.  Phil does a great job at showing this whenever he has couples who are idiots in front of their kids.  I have learned a lot from him.  I applaud his work.   Keep up the good work Dr. Phil.  I think that you have just barely scratched the surface on this issue though and I am afraid that some people will never get it! 

  

                                                                                        Sincerely, 

  

                                                                                        Stella 

 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
January 10, 2006, 12:00 am PST

01/09 Nasty Custody Battles

Quote From: lemondrop

A batterer, abuser........should not be in any form of marriage counseling with his wife......this does not work.......in fact the abuser, batterer punishes the woman for what ever is said......and the woman does not have a safe place to discuss anything with the counselor with the batterer, abuser there. 

  

Chris needs counseling on his own. 

  

Counseling for his anger and hatred. 

  

Counseling for his Drug addictions. 

  

Counseling for his alcohol addiction. 

  

  

Batterers, Abusers could watch that tape a zillion times and still come away from it without insight or change...........they don't take responsibility for what they do.  

  

and when they pretend to........its to manipulate anyone they feel they need to. 

You are so right about this!!!  I have two friends who like myself had abusive fathers.  They NEVER change!!! I know my father had counseling and it didn't work.  It just denied that he was abusing me.  I am the youngest of 3 kids by 3 different wives.  He beat my two brothers and I horribly.  And the court and the therapists didn't care.  I had two court appointed guardians fight over my father.  Not every kid needs a father.  Come on, who needs an abusive father in their lives?!  It will just destroy the child and haunt them for the rest of their lives that is if they live long enough. 
 
User Mood
Depressed

Message Emote
blank
January 10, 2006, 1:10 am PST

Amen to that sister

Quote From: wintrywood

As long as family laws enable parents to do this to their kids and each other how will it stop?  We desperately need reform in the present family law system to prevent vindictive parents doing this to their most precious marital asset, their children.  The law must do all it can to ensure parental conflict is minimized and encourage parents to work together apart to share the  responsibilities of raising their children amicably after divorce.  If you are interested in playing a part in reform contact me offlist. : )
I so agree.  The law needs to be reformed.  Parenting classes do not ensure that the parents behave just because they are told to.  I do not think judges are necessary equipped to judge these cases adequetly as a matter of fact they usually do their thinking so uniformily that the child always loses.  Counselors should immediately be involved.  Or there should be some qualifying expert in a field that is so rare to handle these kind of situations.  Too often law enforcement agencies, human services are used to harass and defame parents and most often they really don't want to be a part of two childish peoples nasty arguments.  So they disappear when really they should be looking out for the children in the first place.  Unfortunately their hands are tied to a certain extent as well. Children most often do not care what a piece of paper says that someone they do not know wrote and signed.  They mostly know what they feel.  And usually they feel caught in the middle with no way out but to abandon their feelings about their parents altogether.  If I can figure out how to contact you I will I am fairly new at this computer but I will give it my best effort.  Either way Good Luck!!!!!
 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
January 10, 2006, 1:42 am PST

Importance: Mothers/Fathers

Look people, you gotta be real careful with this one. I'll show you two of the problems in the dataset, there are many more than two problems.


First off, lone fathers abuse their children at a much lower rate than lone mothers. By "lone" I mean the classical single parent situation with no other adult in the family. It is true that there is a lot less child abuse in lone father families. That said, the group lone fathers does not in any way match up with the group lone mothers. It is much much harder to become a lone father. That creates a partial filter.


The group lone mothers includes drug addicted young women who have a very high incidence of child abuse: These particular women change their boyfriends like they change their underwear. Unrelated males who have no attachment to the child, the child's mother or to child rearing itself have an atrocious rate of child abuse. There are almost no lone fathers who fall into that pattern and unrelated females with no attachments have a lower (still dangerously high) rate of child abuse.


The group lone fathers and the group lone mothers are too different to compare directly!


Next, the group "fathers" as used in studies often includes the mother's boyfriend. This artificially raises the rate of child abuse in the group fathers. We must be extremely careful to see exactly what is being measured when reading these studies!


Note: the feminist "women spend more time with the children" is a red herring. When time with the child is the prime factor there is no child abuse difference between the sexes. Fulltime stay-at-home dads do every bit as well as fulltime stay-at-home moms.


The reason there is more maternal child abuse than paternal child abuse has to do with the factors I discussed above when speaking of lone parent families.

 
First | Prev | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | Next | Last