Message Boards

Messages By: neenna66

User Mood
Worried

Message Emote
blank
October 7, 2008, 5:50 am PDT

Shoudl stay in the news

Quote From: azviewer

The original OJ criminal trial ended more than a decade ago.  Should he have been convicted ?  Yes.  Am I sick of seeing OJ ?  HELL, yes.  But, I am also sick of seeing the Goldmans and the Browns.  Enough is enough !  The criminal trial -- right or wrong -- ended in an acquittal.  The civil trail ended in a judgement against him.  The Goldmans and the Browns should do everything in their power to pursue that judgement but get out of the public eye.  Additionally, they should focus their attention on something in addition to the civil verdict.  This appearingly single focus can not be emotionally or mentally healthy, can it, Dr Phil ?  Am I suggesting that either family forget about their loved one.  No.  Hell, no.  But, I am suggesting that they focus their energies on something other than that lowlife, OJ.  He's not worth it.  Besides, he seems hell bent on ruining his own life so let him get to it.  Justice will be served.  If not here, then hereafter.

I'm sorry (well, not really) but I will be tuning out of this episode.

becky, former AZ viewer now an LV (God help me!  LOL!!)  viewer

OJ was a wife beater and he killed his wife and another person.  This SHOULD stay in the news because we as a society need to be reminded every day that there are men like this and they do get away with doing these things.  Regular men get away with beatings and horrible abuse and by keeping this in the news, we can show that yes men can and do get away with it.
 
User Mood
Worried

Message Emote
blank
October 7, 2008, 5:54 am PDT

THIS MUST STAY IN THE PUBLIC'S EYE

Quote From: shelly_80

I completely agree with you and  azviewer.  I felt for the Goldman's and the Browns 14 years ago when it all took place.  I think OJ should be rotting on death row right now!  On the other hand, how much longer do we have to hear about it?  I too, am extremely sorry for their loss but come on, it's been over 14 years.  Let's move on with life.  I don't mean to sound insensitive but I feel they are keeping the anamocity going strictly for attention.  What else can it be after 14 years?  They have to realize the longer they keep it going and harder they try, it still won't bring Ron and Nicole back.  Why do they feel the need to keep avenging their deaths? Isn't once enogh?  I was 14 at the time of the trial so I didn't "follow it" per say, but I remember how they had EVERY SINGLE tv station tied up for 6 months or more.  You couldn't watch tv unless you wanted to watch the OJ trial.  I doubt very seriously I watch this one. 
This MUST stay visible otehrwise society will become complacent about the number one cause of injury and death to women and that is domestic violence.  We forget that Nicole had left OJ due to abuse and OJ finished up that abuse by killing her.  Ron Goldman just so happened to be caught in the crossfire.  The families of these victims are doing what they can in order to ensure that this is never forgotten. And it NEVER shoudl be forgotten.
 
User Mood
Worried

Message Emote
blank
October 7, 2008, 6:00 am PDT

This MUST stay in the limelight

Quote From: azviewer

 In a word, yes.  I absolutely have sympathy for the Browns and Goldmans.  I am just sick of hearing about OJ and the miscarriage of justice fourteen years later.  And yes, I have lost family in horrific acts (including but not limited to 1st degree murder, war, medical malpractice, ravaging disease) and while I do NOT forget, my life does not focus on these events and these events alone.   Yes, they shape my outlook but are not the singular focus as it seems they are for the Goldman/Browns.  I choose instead to focus on all the good days of these people's lives, not just the horrible last one(s).   I do NOT believe they should give up their civil judgement.  They should pursue it wholeheartedly, just out of the public eye.  The criminal trial is over.  "Judgement" of this kind will not be received in this life.  OJ is an idiot.  (No revelation there.)  What goes around, comes around.  Sometimes you just need to wait longer for it to happen.

Did I read "If I did it?"  Hell, no.  I wouldn't dignify the writing (thus the writer) by giving it a minute of my time.
Domestic violence is an unspoken crime and therfore MUST stay visible.  I applaud the family's of the victims for doing so.  This will be the only way we bring an end to domestic violence - families of the victims speaking out and speaking at every opportunity that they can.
 
User Mood
Worried

Message Emote
blank
October 18, 2008, 8:31 pm PDT

Umm what?

Quote From: boobooiseeyou

Lets say he did use a condom it had a hole in it, the man never knew and now the women gets to come back two years later and nail him. I do not think that is fair at all. What about the womens responsibility she should have told him right away maybe then he could have done something, or they could have discussed abortion or adoption or some alternative. This man had no choice and she took that away.

I am sorry but if this man did not wan to conceive a child he should not have had sexual relations.  When his sperm is released he can no longer say wait!!!!  So he made his bed, he needs to lie in it.
 
User Mood
Worried

Message Emote
blank
December 20, 2008, 10:06 pm PST

PAS is OVERUSED

Sadly PAS is being overused and mostly used against women.  I noticed one poster on here stated that a parent should never ever state a lie about the other parent to the child.  What is a parent to do when the child witnesses something with their own eyes, and that action is seomthing that makes the other parent bad?  Example:

 

The other parent is extremely domineering and phsyically abusive.  The child witnesses several acts of abuse, including the physical abuse.  The child then hears the other parent say degrading things about the abuse victim (the mother).  The abuse victim (generally the mother) then tells the child that the father (perp) is making bad chocies by victimizing the mother, by assaulting her.  The father is confronted by the child about his abuse and the father then claims that the abuse victim is now the perp.  What is her crime?  PAS.............

 

A parent should be free to explain to a child if questioned about the other parent's actions.  If the other parent IS abusive then the child should know. 

 

In case you are wondering, this is my story and the story of hundred of other moms.  Some of thes emoms are mentioned in the suit with the IACHR filed in May 2007.  You can view the petition here:

http://www.stopfamilyviolence.org/ocean/host.php?folder=133&page=468

 

These are WOMEN and one adult child whose lives have been destroyed by the PAS allegations.  Several of these mothers have not seen their child in years.  While there are only 9 moms (3 of whom are anonymous) in this petition, there are hundred more who are too scared to stand up and say, "This is happening to me too."  I have managed to retain placement of my child, but my ex is on a vendetta.  He constantly degrades me to our child, he lies to our child about events that happened a full decade before our marriage, and worse.  He also searches and makes up events in order to attempt to reverse custody on a daily basis.  If I was more courageous, I would contact Dr. Phil myself to let him know what my child and I have been through.  While I personally am strong enough to deal with the vendettas and nastiness towards me, it tears my heart apart to see the things my ex perpetrates against our child.

 

I am facing the loss of our house and my child will have a rather wimpy Christmas as far as material possessions go, but there will be one thing we both will have.  That hopefully will be a holiday free from abuse and the hope for a new year which will see changes made so we will finally have protection.  And the most important thing:

 

We both love each other and we both know that he is a lying mean spirited man who is out for nothing but himself.  My best friend said it best when she said this:

 

XXXX, he hates you more than he loves child.  How simplistic but how true.


And one last point in closing:  I could state that my ex is engaging in PAS, but he is not.  He is enagaging in abuse and poor parenting.  And not just poor parenting - simply put he is a bad dad.  And IMO, letting our child know that her father is not the best role model for a dad is not PAS, it is simply telling the truth.

 

First | Prev | 2 | 3 | 4 | Next Page | Last Page
Return to Message Board