Message Boards

Messages By:

October 11, 2007, 9:33 am PDT

But he is NOT innocent

Quote From: emilec132

I think it is tragec how people presume that OJ is guilty.  After all, he was aquitted in the criminal trial.  Everyone assumes that OJ went there to kill his wife and that poor Ron Goldman happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time.  I think that Ron was the intended victim and that OJ's wife opened the door at the wrong time.  I think it was a drug related killing.  Wasn't Ron's roommate, also, killed just shortly afterward?  Food for thought people.  How could OJ have committed such a bloody crime and not be covered in blood himself?  In the civil trial no one had to prove that he really committed the crime, only that he could have.  A lot of innocent victims are in prison today because no one had to prove that they were guilty.
You wonder why he wasn't covered in blood....he brought different dark clothing...Nicole's and Ron's blood was found in the Bronco and in his shower...The reason he was acquitted was because by playing the race card, the jury IGNORED the mountains of evidence pointing to only one killer, OJ Simpson...I'm sure if they had an actual video of the killing, that ignorant jury still would have acquitted him!
 
October 11, 2007, 9:37 am PDT

Double Jeopardy

If only they could reverse the rule of Double Jeopardy and put this murderer behind bars where he belongs! To try to make money by writing this confession in disguise just proves what a sociopathic ,narcissistic creep this guy is...does he talk in the book about how he's still trying to find the real "killer"???  What must their children think???
 
October 12, 2007, 8:52 am PDT

"If I Did It"

Quote From: bnaito

People who continue to say that O.J. Simpson murdered Nicole and Ron continue to play double standards. They continue to persecute the man after the court cleared him of criminal responsibility. This indicates that they don't believe in the justice system, and that make it very dangerous. What information do they have that wasn't presented in the trial that makes them more right than the jurors who decided on the case? Hypocrites!

 

bn

The justice system works when you have an intelligent jury. If this jury had considered the mountain of evidence pointing to OJ Simpson and weren't swayed by Johnnie Cochran's manipultaion of them by playing the race card, OJ would have been convicted hands-down. Almost all the lawyers today who discuss this case for whatever reason all say he was guilty and got away with murder and what an injustice the jury did. Perhaps it's time for professional juries who can ponder real evidence instead of their emotions.
 
October 12, 2007, 12:07 pm PDT

"If I Did It"

Quote From: kobesnana

You are right about bringing different clothes. He gave a satchel, with his clothes in it, to Kardashian. Did anyone notice the utter disbelief on Kardashian's face when the verdict was read?

 

One of the reasons he was acquitted was because the defense tried to make it look like he was framed by the police department. The steps that the police took was not proper and therefore the defense claimed that the dna was tainted. I knew from the moment I heard about the chase that he did it. Why was he so upset? Why would he want to kill himself? Because he couldn't handle the death of Nicole???? Yeah right!! Because he didn't want to spend his life in jail.

 

He is one sick puppy and anyone who has anything to do with him is even sicker. I feel very sorry for his kids who he no doubt has brainwashed into thinking that their mom was a horrible person and deserved to die and that HE is the greatest man to live.

 

What a sicko! I can't imagine what the Goldmans and the Brown family must feel like. What they have to endure. It's horrific.

Yes, thank you for pointing out Kardashian's utter disbelieving look!  Most of the country had the same look on their face...you are right, the defense tried to say he was framed, raising reasonable doubt, and used Fuhrman perjuring himself about the "N" word to show he could have planted the bloody glove. And speaking of the car chase, if he was innocent why was he carrying cash and a disguise?????? 
 
October 15, 2007, 11:50 am PDT

10/15 The O.J. Book Battle

Quote From: myhorsebelle

Oh  so you didn't watch the trial??  How could you even think he is innocent?? In 69 years I have never seen anyone so GUILTY of a crime such as he committed That jury was so wrong in finding him not guilty, the rest of the world, except you, knows he got away with double murder.

Jan

Um... you must be reading my post wrong....I watched every second of the trial...I said in my post that the jury acquitted him by being manipulated to think the evidence was planted...I believe he did kill those people. Sorry you misunderstood my post.
 

First Page | Previous Page | 1 | Next Page | Last Page
Return to Message Board