Messages By: rissa140

User Mood
Relaxed

Message Emote
blank
January 29, 2007, 10:20 am PST

Big Love

Its been a while since I posted but when I saw the preview for this upcoming show I had to come read about it & see what was being said. I think its awesome that Clayton loves his wife the way she is, rolls & all! I think this world needs more men like him & just more people like him in general.... meaning that more men & people need to respect & appreciate us bigger women. But I do think that if Cheryl wants to lose weight for health reasons and/or just to feel better about herself, then she should & Clayton should support her & love her no matter what she decides or how much weight she loses. I hope they come to an understanding because something like this shouldn't be the 'thing' that comes between a couple.

 

Now for the issue with Phillip & his brother Paul, I give Phillip major kudos his love & admiration of bigger women. As a big woman myself, I know what it's like to be teased, made fun of & to just feel lower than dirt... So to know that there ARE men out there who admire plus sized women & who also just believe that appearance isn't everything, is great & very good to know. And to Paul (and people like him), plus sized women are NOT disgusting! What IS disgusting is the kind of attitude you have towards them & towards anyone you feel isn't attractive. Plus sized women (and men) are people too, people with lives & feelings & people who should be treated with RESPECT!  Being attracted to, admiring & loving big women (and big men) isn't something that people should be embarrassed and/or ashamed about! So your brother (Phillip) loves plus sized women, SO WHAT! THAT'S WHAT HE LIKES! Everyone has their preferences about what they like & dislike! You don't have to like what someone else's preferences are, but you should very well RESPECT them! YOU (Paul & people like you) are the ones that should be embarrassed & ashamed of yourselves!

 

~LD, a plus sized woman who is SICK of other's degrading the plus sized population!~

 

 

 
User Mood
Relaxed

Message Emote
blank
October 3, 2007, 3:44 pm PDT

Nobody's a perfect parent, But she DOES need help

With all this drama, there is one thing for certain & thats that Britney does need to get some help & get her life back on track. I cant believe whats happening to her. I imagine being in the spotlight all the time isnt easy & a lot of people (as we've seen in the media) have trouble staying on the right path during it all, HOWEVER, there ARE celebrities who have the strength to do it & I wish more celebs had that strength.  I feel most badly for her kids, since they are truly the innocent ones in all this. Parenting is definately not easy. I dont have kids of my own yet, but I have a huge family so I'm around children & parents all the time... A lot of younger parents (in my family) as well. Nobody is the PERFECT parent, but there are better parents & in my honest opinion, going out & partying every single weekend & several times during the week until only God knows how long/late, is not a better parent. I'm sorry if I have offended anyone by saying that, thats not my intention, its just how I feel. As far as Kevin Federline being a better parent than Britney... I know lots of people have their doubts, especially how he left Shar Jackson, but Shar HERSELF has said that he's a good dad. So the guy cant be that bad of a parent . But like I said, nobody is the perfect parent & I just really hope Britney is able to get herself together & that these kids dont have to suffer much more.
 
User Mood
Relaxed

Message Emote
blank
October 15, 2007, 4:10 pm PDT

Humanizing of dogs/pets

On the subject about the dog (or any other pet for that matter) being more human than canine....

 I believe some people go WAY overboard with the "humanizing of pets", if you will. Maybe a cute 'shirt' here & there or talking to your dog (pet) kinda like a human isnt such a big thing, but when you go further than that & dress them in actual outfits, want them to be an actual part of a wedding & treat them as humans instead of the animals/pets they are, then its time to chill out. I cringe every time I see someone's dog "dressed up" like they're human & going to a party. I myself have a dog, a miniature daschound (sp?) & yes, she is a little spoiled, but NOWHERE to the extent of being treated as a human. I dont know if anyone watches or has watched the show Wife Swap, but on one episode there was a woman who was a HUGE dog lover & literally had NO HUMAN friends, just her 3 or 4 dogs. She put her dogs ahead of her husband & son, had the dogs on a little schedule (I think) & made them clean up after the dogs. She even had the dogs in the BATHTUB with her! I mean really, thats just crazy. Yes people, love your dogs/pets unconditionally, but stop "humanizing" them so much.

 
User Mood
Relaxed

Message Emote
blank
October 22, 2007, 10:39 am PDT

About the 25 & 15 year old

I may get stoned for this, but its my personal opinion....

 

I'm sorry but, If this 15 year old CONSENTED to the affair, then she is NOT a victim of RAPE! I read another post in another thread about the sexual predator that was recently caught, etc. and I have to agree with that person & say that I highly believe the laws need to change in regard to consensual sex. (For the record, this person's post was NOT talking about the sexual predator that the discussion was about!) Dont get me wrong, the affair should NOT have happened because the guy is married, but to say he is a "sexual predator" or anything of that nature is ridiculous, given that this girl consented. I dont care what anyone says, she is old enough to know better, so where is HER responsibility & punishment in all this? The laws are so twisted.... its legal for a 15 year old to work in some places & take driving classes to learn how to drive, but its not legal for them to consent to sex??? How does that make any sense? And we all know that if it was the other way around & the older person was female & the younger one was a male, then the female would get a slap on the wrist, compared to if she were male.

 

My mother got pregnant with me at 15 (had me at 16) & my biological father was like 21-22.... did my grandparents try to get him in trouble/arrested? NO, because they knew my mother was just as responsible as he was! People need to STOP treating teens as LITTLE kids & make them accountable for their actions. Its not fair for this guy (or anyone else) to be facing felony charges & possibly have to register/be branded as a "sex offender" (and the other person involved gets NO kind of punishment what so ever) when it was CONSENSUAL! I mean really, lets focus on the REAL sexual predators & rapists & put THEM behind bars or worse, and leave the CONSENTING people to clean up their own messes!

 

(oh, and I believe here in CT, the legal age of consent is 16)

 
User Mood
Relaxed

Message Emote
blank
October 22, 2007, 9:17 pm PDT

10/24 Controversial Love Affairs

Quote From: ceildh1

I'm not going to stone you, after reading your post you do bring up valid points, however I'd like to offer a couple of my own thoughts.

AGREED- teens are NOT little kids, and should not be treated as such, however they are NOT adults either, and they often do NOT think of the consequences to themselves and others for their actions.  The man is an ADULT, and HE should know better- and blaming a "PornAddiction " is a classic cop out.  But a fifteen year old today, will he look for someone even YOUNGER tommorrow, I wish these so- called adults would just get the hell out of our High Schools.

AGREED- if the men are charged like this, then a woman getting involved with a BOY should be charged, and jailed the same way, and labelled a sex offender as well.

AGREED- let's work at getting the REAL preditors off the streets, however I wonder if the thing for the non legal or barely legals could be a sign of something more sinister ?

Just a couple of thoughts.

Cheers

Well thank you for not stoning me, I know many people would and/or will.

 

I AGREE that teens are not yet adults either & sometimes dont think about the consequences of their actions. However, its the parent's job to teach their children right from wrong & what could/will happen if they choose wrong. Now, will kids/teens ALWAYS listen to EVERYTHING their parents tell them? Of course NOT, but if they do do something they know they're not supposed to, then they DO need to deal/suffer with the consequences & not be treated like a victim or innocent person.... or how else are they gonna learn from the wrong-doings?

 

I also AGREE that the "porn addiction" is a lame excuse/cop out. However, I dont think we (generally speaking) should just assume that this man would/could go after someone even younger. I mean, I suppose we shouldnt necessarily assume either way, but for some reason, I just get the feeling he is NOT a REAL sexual predator. But I guess I will just have to wait until the show airs to kinda see how he acts & what he says/how he words things to get a better opinion.

 

As far as the thing for the non-legal or barely legals being a sign of something more sinister.... I think its about the thrill. The whole being with someone younger or older thing is very fun & exciting to some, of course it should be CONSENSUAL. But some other people still find the concept very taboo, therefore, making it seem more 'forbidden & exciting'. I actually have some personal experience with this....  however, I was older than this girl on the show (and he was not married). I was 19, about to turn 20 (I'm 21 now) & I started dating a 30 year old. In the beginning the age thing was an issue for me because my mom, uncle & aunt were (still are) in their 30s & it was kinda weird, I actually turned him down at first because of it, but I got over it because I really liked him & it wasnt like nobody else in my family hadnt dated someone with an age difference (obviously my mom included.... now in her 30s, she's also dated younger guys). By being involved with this guy, I realized that older guys tend to be more real & mature than guys my age. Which is why I now prefer older guys, I do have my limits though. This is NOT the case for ALL older guys, but definitely for a lot of them. Anyway, now I'm just rambling, but these are some more of my thoughts.

 
User Mood
Relaxed

Message Emote
blank
October 23, 2007, 9:58 pm PDT

10/24 Controversial Love Affairs

Quote From: manofgoods

Sorry, but I have to disagree. Any man or woman that has sex with a teenager is considered statutory rape, regardless whatever the child consented to it, or not. No matter how you think about it, it is rape. If the man really didn't want to destroy his family & be behind bars, don't you think that he would've said no to her, told his wife about her actions, & have his wife call her parents on her? Think about it. I don't have any sympathy for rapists at all; I don't see why you do. Therefore, the child is the victim! Not to mention his wife & their children!
I DO believe his wife & children (if they do have any) are victims of his adultry, and he should've said no if he didnt want to destroy his family... but I stand by my opinion about the 15 year old NOT being a victim. If this guy was an ACTUAL rapist, as in he FORCED her, THEN I would NOT feel the least bit of sympathy for him. BUT, If she WILLINGLY CONSENTED (meaning, he's not just saying she did), then he is NOT a rapist & she was NOT raped! And it seems like the only reason, specifically in cases like this (when its consensual), its considered "statutory rape" is because the legal system couldnt think of anything better. If this girl did in fact willing consent, then she needs to take some responsibility as well!
 
User Mood
Relaxed

Message Emote
blank
October 23, 2007, 10:49 pm PDT

10/24 Controversial Love Affairs

Quote From: rpmhansn

Most predators say their victims "consented".  It can be part of a predatory delusion.  As an abused child at the age of 14, I can tell you that my aggressor stated "She wanted it".  I did not fight, kick or even say no.  No child should be put in that position of complacency.  Some victims even believe they wanted it.  Please don't presume that you know all the facts in this case.  Predators operate freely by using psychological tactics to attain their victim's trust.  (ie pity, remorse, affection, love, etc)  What do you really know about this particular 15 year old?  She may have known what she was doing but more than likely was manipulated by this "adult" man.  As for this man, he obviously was aware of the risk he was taking.  He only became concerned of his actions once he was discovered. 

 

The fact is that the age of consent laws MUST have some sort of defined age.  What do you suggest that age be?  15? 13? 10?   And how would we define "child"?  Unfortunately, we cannot make the law per individual circumstance.  So, it must be based on an overall perception.  I say since the legal age of adulthood is 18, the laws on legal consent stand as a realistic method of resolution.  As for being labeled "sex offender", there are degrees of offenses.  It covers everything from indirect contact ( ie patting or pinching a rear) to direct sexual contact.  Again, there is no realistic way to sort out the separate stance of the few.  It may be unfortunate but it is a fact. 

 

It's easy to voice complaints against the justice system, The problem lies in finding a clear, concise and workable solution. 

First & foremost, I'm sorry that you were abused, I truly am.

 

As for him just saying she consented, IF that is the case then yes, it was rape because that would mean she didnt WILLINGLY CONSENT.... but if this girl WILLINGLY CONSENTED & REALLY DID WANT TO HAVE SEX, I do NOT feel she was raped or is a victim. I'm not trying to say I know all the facts or anything about this girl, if I'm giving that impression, I apologize... thats why I stated that I'd have to wait until the show aired to see how things unfold. As I also stated before, I know that teens are not exactly adults yet (as they are not LITTLE KIDS either), but what some people need to realize is that, they (teens) are capable of more things than most people would like to believe. Most teens these days know more about sex (and other things) then their parents. MAYBE she seduced him!? I'm not saying that she did, but I'm saying its possible. And IF that were true, then this guy could've said no. He could've said no either way, but I'm just saying.

 

As for the laws for age of consent.... I agree that there should be some sort of defined age & it should be the same age in every state. As for what that age should be... I would say 15. I know MANY MANY people DISAGREE, but here is my reason why.... Like I stated in another post, at 15, teens are already allowed to work in some places & start learning how to drive. I believe that if a 15 year old can work & learn how to drive a car, then they're NOT a "child" (because children dont work or drive cars) & they ARE able to consent to sex. Many of our government's laws are twisted & dont make sense. I know this is off topic but another fine example is that you have to be 21 to buy/drink alcohol, but you only have to be 18 to not only buy/smoke cigarettes, but to serve in the MILITARY! How does that make sense? The justice system clearly needs to catch up to biology, technology & society.

 

 

 
User Mood
Relaxed

Message Emote
blank
October 24, 2007, 11:35 am PDT

10/24 Controversial Love Affairs

Quote From: manofgoods

It's true that the girl should take responsibility if she consented to it, but you have to understand, kids are kids, & they don't think for themselves. They aren't adults, & don't make smart decisions. That's why we have laws like this for. That's when morals come in. Are you saying that all men & women in this country can have sex with many teenage minors as they like, & then get away with it because the teens consented to it? Look at Mary Kay Letourneau & Debra Lafave, for instance. They are the ones who chose to have sex with their teenage students, & even though the teenage boys consented it, should they have gotten away for the crime because they wanted it? No way! Otherwise, they would continue to do it to many others. I'm a man myself at 25 years of age, so I know what's going on. Plus you can bet that I would have that person locked up whenever they continue to molest children. It's not right to be protecting them when they can go do it to someone else.
I know that kids dont always think for themselves, but even though this girl isnt exactly an adult yet, she isnt exactly a LITTLE kid either & should know better. Who's to say she didnt come on to him & seduce him? I'm not saying she did, but it could be possible. Yes, he should've said no either way. But now that its happened, if this girl willingly consented, then he shouldn't be the only one getting blamed/in trouble. Not that either of them should be in trouble with the law since (I'm assuming) it was consensual. I stated in another post that I think the age of consent should be 15 in every state.... since at that age, 15 year olds are already working in some places & learning how to drive & LITTLE kids dont work or drive. As for the instances with the teachers, I do believe they should've lost their teaching licenses because I do think its really unethical for teachers to have sex with students.... and if memory serves me right, the teen boys in those 2 teacher cases were like 13, well I know in the Mary Kay case he was 13 when they started, and in that sense it was wrong because 13 is too young to have sex in my opinion. However, With that said, that boy seemed to know exactly what he was doing, so I'm honestly kinda on the fence there. And I'm sorry, but in my honest opinion, these teens were NOT molested. Just horny, hormone driven teens that should know better as well. But I guess we'll have to agree to disagree.
 
User Mood
Relaxed

Message Emote
blank
October 24, 2007, 2:02 pm PDT

10/24 Controversial Love Affairs

Quote From: wiseone2

So a child should know better, but the adult shouldn't?  Typical thinking of minority women.  Always  holding children responsible, but never the man.  Sounds to me as though you are the type of woman that would not protect a child if he or she told you they had been involved with an adult. 

 

I hope you understood Dr. Phils explanation as to WHY you CANNOT have "consentual" sex with a minor.  It doesn't matter if the child walks around stark naked, you are the adult and should behave accordingly. 

 

As an  educated woman, I understand that children's brains have not fully developed and they are unable to make sound decisions and understand consequences as an adult should.  Do some of us not cringe when we think back to the dumb decisions we made at 13, 17, 21, hell even 25! 

 

I love how some women feel that underage girls should "know better" meanwhile these "adult" women and/or their adult friends are having unhealthy relationships with men and they themselves fall prey to seduction, lies etc.  These women should know better at this stage in life, yet they do not.  But a 15 year old should know better?

 

Let's use logic and  not our pathetic family history from two or three generations ago!

Well OF COURSE the adult should know better! BUT, It took TWO WILLINGLY CONSENTING people, therefore, BOTH of them need to be held responsible! And I'm sorry to you, everyone else who disagrees & even Dr. Phil, but I DISAGREE with his explanation.

 

A 15 year old is NOT A CHILD! As its been said on this board already, teens these days ARE more capable of things & knowing exactly what they're getting into. MANY 15 year olds (and other teens) are no longer as innocent & pure as they used to be generations ago & people need to realize that.

 

And like I said in a previous post, its the parents job to teach their children right from wrong... and we all know that children & teens dont always listen to EVERYTHING their parents tell them, so if/when they do choose wrong, then they NEED to held responsible! How else are they supposed to learn from their mistakes if people want to keep treating them as little innocent victims, when (in cases like this) they clearly aren't? If someone in their teens told me that they had WILLINGLY CONSENTED to being with an older person, you better believe that I would tell them they are just as responsible for what happened... like I said, as long as it was willingly consensual. So YES, a 15 year old SHOULD very well know better!

 
User Mood
Relaxed

Message Emote
blank
October 24, 2007, 2:28 pm PDT

10/24 Controversial Love Affairs

Quote From: deevik

I kinda agree with you, some (ephasis on the some) 15 yr olds are mature enough to know whats going on.  Back in the day a 15 yr old would have been married off and probally have already had a child.  The only thing i don't understand in a relationship with a 15 yr. old is they are really annonying! Other than sex what do you really have in common with most people that age.

Well, thank you for kind of agreeing with me.

 

But the whole age difference thing really depends on the people involved. Some people DO have TONS more in common with someone older or younger than themselves.

 

First | Prev | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | Next | Last
Return to Message Board