Messages By: rissa140

User Mood
Relaxed

Message Emote
blank
November 14, 2007, 10:17 pm PST

11/14 A Daughter in Danger?

Quote From: boobear328

your OVER 18! And was over 18 when you met him online(1 year and 2 months), NOT 16! Im NOT saying long distance relationships dont work, some actually do(my cousin net her husband online and been married for about 6 years now), but yet some dont.

 

 

Are you assuming that because she was 16 when she met him online that she wasnt really in love with him or knew what love was? Because I think thats pretty judgmental. I'm not saying that ALL 16 year olds know what love is, some of them dont, but some of them DO. I agree that at 16 she should not have tried to go to another country... but the thing is that, right after she turned 18, she did go. And since she is now 18, nobody can force her to leave if she doesn't want to. And just to put it out there, I was 19 when I first met someone from the net in person (granted it was someone from the same town) & even dated someone else from the net & from the same town later that year, who was 30. Anyway, exactly, some LD relationships work & some dont... but nobody knows EXACTLY how someone feels, no matter what age they are.
 
User Mood
Relaxed

Message Emote
blank
November 15, 2007, 8:46 am PST

11/14 A Daughter in Danger?

Quote From: korinagarcia

You know alot of 18,19 and 20 are still like kids and need guidance. There are teenagers thinking life is really easy and make poor choices and i have a feeling there is going to be tragedy in the end. INS needs to look into the real reason Abdullah wants to be with Katherine and marry. Laws need to be made that better protect these children. My daughter was in Oregon and met a person that was older and he sent her a plane ticket to go to Michigan with him, she was 16 and lucky i found the ticket, i reported it and cancelled the flight with no refunds the airline said that there was nothing i could do about this man trying to take my daughter to another state. I was furious i could have lost my daughter. Hope this Family doesn't give up and follow your insticts. God Bless
Oh, I'm aware that a lot of 18-20 year olds need guidance... hell, a lot of older adults need guidance as well. HOWEVER, there's a difference between giving someone, specifically someone who's legally an adult, advice/guidance & forcing (or trying to force) them to do something they don't want to do. If your son or daughter (generally speaking) wanted to go into the Military once they were 18 & you were terrified and/or disapproved, you could give them all the advice in the world, but in the end, its THEIR choice. I myself, have a fairly close & protective family & of course they don't agree/approve with every little thing I do (meeting people offline being one), but they realize I am an adult & will make my own choices, even if that means letting me make some mistakes.... its called letting go & letting your children grow up. I'm not saying this girl's family should stop caring or even stop worrying about her, thats what parents do, they care & worry... BUT she is legally an adult now, its up to HER.
 
User Mood
Relaxed

Message Emote
blank
November 15, 2007, 10:55 am PST

11/15 A Daughter in Danger? Part 2

Quote From: flthomcat

Sadly, MYSPACE gets all the bad press becuase it earns it. When you have the largest website on the Internet when it comes to a teen following, there are going to be a large number of problems. Some of the problems are high profile (pedophiles, rape, dangerous affairs, etc) so they get the press.

.

Our 13-yr-old is not allowed on MYSPACE and never will be. There is absolutely NO REASON a young person needs to be "talking" with strangers. We wouldn't allow her to talk to a stanger on the street, so why would we allow her to "hook up with" a faceless, nameless identity behind a screen.

 

Our daughter is not alone. Many of her classmates are also barred from sites like MYSPACE. These teen girls and boy e-mail EACHOTHER and go to more innocent sites together. It can be done and it can be great for the teen!

 

It's time parents wake up to ALL the dangers on the web. Speaking to strangers (even on the Internet) is not safe and not good for teens. It's simply too risky. As parents, we are supposed to minimize that risk!

 

My hubby is a federal officer and knows all too well who is lurking on MYSPACE and other similar sites. If the general pubic knew what he knows (and sees too often), they would monitor their children MUCH more carefully.

As someone who has a Myspace profile, I just have to say that its not the site's fault for what people CHOOSE to do on there. And like the other poster, I'm sick of people blaming things on the site in general. Are there lots of creeps on there like any other site? Absolutely! BUT, there are also a lot of good, honest people on there who are looking for new friends, to reconnect with old friends, stay in contact with family members, find love (which is not wrong to do), even networking for jobs. Musicians, film makers & comedians use it to promote their work & gain audiences. I myself, have met some very nice people from that site, on & off it. With that said, I dont think Myspace is a place for someone under 16. I hate to say it but, I even have cousins on there who are younger than that & I wonder what the hell they're doing on there & its sad to say that some of their parents aren't watching what they're doing, so I like to check up on them. Anyway, most people/parents don't know that Myspace has a number of ways that you can be safer on there.

 

*YOU control WHAT info is on your profile

*YOU control WHO can look at your profile & pictures, by making it PRIVATE

*YOU control WHO can add you as a friend

*YOU control WHAT comments you want to accept

*IF someone starts harassing you, YOU can REPORT & BLOCK them

 

There may be more that isnt coming to mind... but the thing is that, some people choose not to use those features & then IF, GOD FORBID, something bad happens, they're quick to blame someone else or blame the site without looking at their part in it or what they could've done to be safer. This isn't the case for EVERYONE, but certainly enough people. People need to start being responsible for THEIR OWN actions.

 

Also, I'm tired of people saying/implying that the Internet is the only place where you can come into contact with creeps, especially creeps who pretend to be honest people. I hear people saying all the time that the net isnt the way to meet someone, specifically someone honest & decent because anyone can be charming on the net. And yes, anyone can be charming on the net, however, you can meet someone who pretends to be charming & decent anywhere... on the street, in the grocery store, working for charity, there are even some cases where others meet those kinds of people in CHURCH (no offense to anyone, just saying). And by the age of 16, you should very well know what's right, wrong, appropriate & inappropriate.

 
User Mood
Relaxed

Message Emote
blank
November 15, 2007, 2:55 pm PST

11/15 A Daughter in Danger? Part 2

Quote From: palzee33

Thank you for saying it.  The internet is not the big bad wolf..... People have to take responsiblity for their actions.  I have been using the internet for 14 years.  I can honestly say I have not had any problems.

 

Furthermore, as for you not allowing your children to have web pages, etc.  How about teaching your children to be trustworthy rather than not trusting them.  Let them grow up and teach them properly.  I can tell you, from experience, the children I knew growing up that were sheltered and not allowed to experience life, got in more trouble than anyone else.

You're welcome & thank you lol! I also agree with what else you had to say about teaching children to be trustworthy & responsible rather than not trusting them at all, and letting them grow up properly. You're right, in many cases when children are too sheltered & not allowed to experience things (and yes, even make some mistakes), they tend to rebel a bit more than those who are allowed some freedom. As parents, you need to have a healthy balance between being strict/protective & lenient/soft, or its only going to push your children away.
 
User Mood
Relaxed

Message Emote
blank
November 15, 2007, 3:24 pm PST

11/15 A Daughter in Danger? Part 2

Quote From: karen770

trusting a Palistinian is the same this as trusing a snake...you can NOT!!!!!!!
Wow, thats a bit harsh & judgmental dont you think? Why not just say that you can not trust all white, black, mexican, Indian (from India), etc people? You wanna know why? Because its NOT right to lump ALL of a certain race/culture into one stereotypical group! Not everyone is the same!
 
User Mood
Relaxed

Message Emote
blank
November 15, 2007, 3:47 pm PST

11/15 A Daughter in Danger? Part 2

Quote From: angel23_2007

I feel sorry for this girl, and I can tell from abdullah, or whatever his name is, tha t he's a liar. I'm also a little annoyed at her mother. What the heck was she thinking, letting her 16 year old daughter on the computer for hours talking to some strange man??? Parents now a days just seem to not care. She should have been over her shoulder, watching everything thing that she was doing. I don't care if it's being nosey, not having a right to privacy, or whatever the kid thinks, it saves situations like this from happening in the future. Kids DON'T NEED computers in their rooms. That is just asking for trouble. It should be in a room where there is someone present, there should also be set time limits on internet usage for children. If they're living under their parents roof, or just not that mature yet to make the right desicions, then parents have every right to know what their kids are up to.
If nobody wants to blame Myspace, why don't you search around that site, a little? Look at all the pictures of girls dressed and posed provacatively. Myspace should make it their responsibility to take all that crap off of there.
I also don't care what country, or place a person is from, it could be the guy down the street, kids should not be talking to stangers, ANYWHERE!
As for Katherine, I hope she's doing all right. I can't wait to see the conclusion to the second segment. I'll be watching for it.

"If nobody wants to blame Myspace, why don't you search around that site, a little? Look at all the pictures of girls dressed and posed provacatively. Myspace should make it their responsibility to take all that crap off of there."

 

 

Before deciding to blame Myspace for not taking the pictures down, why dont you place blame & responsibilty on the girls who are dressing & acting like that & posting the pictures on there to begin with??? Sooo many girls (and boys) are on there LYING about their ages & acting older than they are. And then if/when something goes wrong, the teens & a lot of the time the parents automatically blame the site & other people they (the teens) were in contact with instead of taking responsibilty for their or their children's actions. And When you upload pictures on there, it tells you that pictures containg nudity or full nudity are prohibited & will be deleted. Also, people can report images they find innapropriate & get them deleted. But the point is that, these girls should know what's right, wrong, appropriate & inappropriate to be posting on the site. Parent's need to START making their kids/teens take some responsibility for THEIR actions & STOP blaming it ALL on others & the internet. Myspace is NOT the enemy, its the individual people (young & old ) who act irresponsibly on there, that are.

 
User Mood
Relaxed

Message Emote
blank
November 15, 2007, 4:49 pm PST

11/15 A Daughter in Danger? Part 2

Quote From: flthomcat

No, at age 16 they don't always know what's right, wrong, appropriate and inappropriate. Many don't have parents who give a flip about them! But if they DO know it, that doesn't mean they use common sense (and restraint) and make good choices. Yes, people should be "responsible for their own actions," but it's up to us parents to make the best choices for our children! TEENS are NOT responsible adults!

 

You are apparently CLUELESS on the emotional development of teenagers. Take that from a high school teacher who has had the priviledge of working w/ them 5 days a week! Teens are naive, immature, too trusting, think they'll live forever and bad stuff happens just to others, they are self-indulgent, they often don't learn from their mistakes, they think they know EVERYTHING, etc.

 

Don't YOU recall being a teen? Haven't you matured GREATLY since then? We all have!

 

I did not blame MYSPACE. It's a tool for those mature enough to handle it. But do not EVER tell me teens should be on it and talking to strangers, which they WILL do. They're curious. They're human. They think they know what's best for them. They are trusting. They see the best in others. And THAT Is what makes them easy prey to PREDATORS! Those "predators" not only include criminals, but lying boyfriends, lying girlfriends and just plain losers.

 

It's very easy for those types to HIDE behind a computer screen; it's NO SO EASY for them to do that face-to-face in school, at work, in church, etc. And YOU know that.

I'm sorry, but if they had parents who ACTED LIKE PARENTS & taught them, then at 16 they WOULD/SHOULD know what is right, wrong, appropriate & inappropriate! And NO, they dont always use common sense, I'm very well aware of that, but teens WOULD learn from their mistakes more if their PARENTS actually MADE them take RESPONSIBILITY for THEIR actions when they dont use common sense, instead of blaming everyone/thing else.

 

I am NOT clueless, I know very well how teens are, I also know how a lot of parents aren't. I'm 21 years old & have seen & heard a lot of things first hand.

 

And YES, it IS just as easy for "predators" to hide who they really are face-to-face in school, at work, at church, etc. They could be very charming ANYWHERE, NO MATTER WHERE THEY ARE (on the net or in public), and anyone who thinks otherwise is in a bit of denial. 

 

Lets stop treating TEENS like spoiled little babies & actually hold them accountable/responsible for what THEY (rightly or wrongly) CHOOSE to do!

 
User Mood
Relaxed

Message Emote
blank
November 16, 2007, 3:00 pm PST

11/16 Scary Skinny

Quote From: weigelre

Why do we continue to support designers and clothing stores who perpetuate this problem by filling the racks with clothes that no one over a size 7 can wear?  The designers send size 2 samples to the models who then have to starve to get into that outfit in order to keep their jobs.  My oldest daughter has been between a size 7 and 9 since she was about 14 yet when we go into a clothing store the L size is small on her.  It makes her feel like she is fat and she often ends up in tears.  We need to start voting with our wallets.  If those hollywood actresses and socialites would boycott the designers who continue to force models to starve themselves in order to work on the catwalk, they'd soon change the standard to a more acceptable and normal size.  It seems as though the people designing the clothes don't really want to see a woman's body as they keep reducing the size so that the women get thinner and thinner until they look like young boys. 

I agree!

 

As a plus sized woman in today's society, a now proud plus sized woman I might add, it sickens me to constantly see girls & women (and in rare cases, boys/men) killing themselves like this to be so thin & trying live up to other people's standards of what beauty is & what it takes to get somewhere in life. I for one, am sick of society looking down upon plus sized women (and men) & making it seem like being of substance is the worst thing in the world... because it is NOT. Even the beginning standards for plus size clothing lines & models bother me. Because, the standard starts at a size 14! And in my honest opinion, that is NOT plus sized. To ME, a size 14 looks way more AVERAGE than plus sized. I think the starting size for Plus sizes needs to be changed to around 18/20... that, I think, would look more fitting. Please do not confuse my thinking/reasoning for being discriminating (that would be hypocritical of me), but rather DIFFERENTIATING between what is & is not plus sized. Plus, the average woman here in the USA is a size 14, which I believe is the size that Marilyn Monroe was. I wish more young girls & women who are so "scared" to be "fat" would look at & listen to/read the advice on body image/acceptance & beauty given by beautiful women such as Queen Latifah & Mo'Nique. Both of those wonderful women are such great inspirations, to both plus sized AND thin people (women).

 

 We need to realize that, as long as someone is healthy, their weight  shouldn't matter. So many people make assumptions & buy into the misconceptions of plus sized people. For example, a lot of people believe that if you're "overweight", you're automatically unhealthy... which is NOT true! Does being "overweight" put you a bit more at a risk for health problems? Yes. But, that doesn't mean ALL "overweight" people are unhealthy, or are going to be unhealthy. That would be like saying ALL thin people (by this, I mean average thin) are healthy, which also isn't true. There are MANY average thin people who have heart, blood, sugar, etc problems. I am around 5'2"-5'3", about 260lbs (When I checked the beginning of this month) & have NONE of those health issues. A lot of people also like to forget that genetics play a part in someone's health as well. Which is the important thing I (and everyone else) need to keep checking up on, because several things run in my family... but as of right now, I am a healthy plus sized woman. There's the topic of "when is someone TOO big?" and in my honest opinion, a person is too big when he/she has major trouble doing ever day things on their own... getting out of bed, walking at a normal pace, working, etc. THAT, and IF someone has other health problems, is when people should become really concerned with the issue of being "overweight".

 

But please people (young girls & women specifically), do NOT be afraid of curves, or a roll here & there. In my opinion, women are supposed to be of some substance. Do NOT lose weight just to "fit in" & impress people. I've been there & all it did was set me back & take me longer to finally have some self-esteem/confidence. I am no longer at my heaviest weight (which was about 310), but I can honestly tell you that now, I am happy & proud to be the size I am. I no longer crave to be thin, I'm now more focused on just maintaining my weight, rather than losing more. IF I do lose more, great, but also great if I dont. I know I sort of got way off topic here, but my point is this... EVERYONE is beautiful in THEIR OWN ways & you do NOT have to be super skinny/thin (or skinny at all) to be whoever & whatever you want to be in life. NOTHING is worth killing yourselves like this for. I hope & pray that anyone who suffers from eating disorders gets help SOON, before its too late.

 
User Mood
Relaxed

Message Emote
blank
December 6, 2007, 12:19 pm PST

12/05 Internet Dangers

Quote From: lighthouseguy

 I liked your post so much that I thought I'd give it a simple amen so that it could be repeated!!

Thank you, I really appreciate that!

 
User Mood
Relaxed

Message Emote
blank
December 6, 2007, 1:15 pm PST

12/05 Internet Dangers

Quote From: gift490

what show was you watching? There was no mention of Rhodesia staying home and being  sooo lazy.  as you put it. She is a working mother and wife, and If I am correct it appears she was the main bread winner ,while he kept his fat ass home on the PC. . Further more she is attractive and all men for your information do not want an anorexic .What's wrong with putting your family first? Making sure your children and your husband are cared for. If Marcus  was working maybe his lazy ass would not have had the time to cheat with a PC whore,who  I am sure was quite aware that he was married. If she had any dignity she would not have continued with the affair knowing he was a married.man. she is as much at fault as Marcus.As far looks is concerned , Marcus is no handsome stud.

THANK YOU, I AGREE! There's NOTHING wrong with putting your family first. And Rhodesia's no saint, I don't think she ever claimed to be. But....

 

When I read that person's post, it made my blood boil a bit. I  mean, how SHALLOW can someone be? Just because a person MAY have let their looks "go", is NO excuse for the other one to cheat! And you are right, NOT EVERY man wants a thin woman, or prefers only thin women (not that weight should even matter much). I also wanted to add that, when people take those vows & get married it's supposed to be forever, and you're saying that you love that person unconditionally... that includes, or should include, when either person's looks change. Because lets face it, EVERYONE'S appearance changes over time, but that should NOT change how you feel about them. Love/marriage is supposed to be based on more than just how someone looks. I don't think you can even call it LOVE if that's (looks) all it's based on, that sounds more like LUST, to me. If you're (generally speaking) going to be that shallow & criticize the way your partner looks and/or cheat on them because of that, then you have no business being in a relationship/marriage with them, or anyone, if that's the kind of attitude you have. Looks only get you so far anyway. Oh, and not that it's right to judge someone for being overweight because in my book its not right, but if you do/are, make sure you're not overweight yourself lol, because that just makes you look stupid.

 

I think Rhodesia needs to... 1. Stop blaming Myspace & start putting ALL blame on HIM for cheating, then (and most importantly) 2. LEAVE HIM & FIND HERSELF A REAL MAN! Because, she is a beautiful woman & CAN do better.

 

First | Prev | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | Next | Last
Return to Message Board