Message Boards

Messages By: preraph

User Mood
Peaceful

Message Emote
blank
October 11, 2005, 7:40 pm PDT

Always pick the dogs!

Anyone who would ask you to abdicate your responsibilities to any innocent and harmless and benevolent creature is not worth having.  Too say nothing of anyone who would ask you to give up or minimize something you love doesn't know what love is.  That's an uncaring person who you should certainly not have kids with.
 
User Mood
Peaceful

Message Emote
blank
October 13, 2005, 2:10 pm PDT

If a man had done it, no one would be doubting it

The evidence is clear that she ran him down.  In the show, they seemed to actually minimize the part about there being tire marks that swerved towards him.  Brandy justified these marks by saying they couldn't be conclusive that the marks didn't happen days before.  Ridiculous!  In a hypothetical situation, that may be true, but these marks were where marks HAD TO BE for the impact to have occurred.  So if those marks are days old, then where are the marks that killed Daniel?  Over and over again, we see the parents of murderers in denial OR just plain lying to get their child out of jail.  In this case, I give them the benefit of the doubt and say they are in denial.  Even Brandy herself did not express a strong denial that she was guilty and she even expressed guilt over and over.  If this was an abusive ex who truly did run out in front of the car, why would she feel guilty about him.  I will say that I believe he probably was abusive and that they, evidenced by her late-night sneaking the car out to go to him and have a big melodrama, had what is quite common in teens, a mutually melodramatic relationship where grand gestures were commonplace.  If she truly feared him, she wouldn't have snuck out to go make such gesture, which you would know would incite him.  That doesn't make him innocent however, and I have seen these obsessive entitled males over and over and how they react to threat of termination of a relationship.  I think they had a mutually dramatic and over-the-line relationship and that she knew there would be trouble when she did what she did that night.  Did she go intending to run him, down?  I wouldn't think so.  But the high passion of the moment allowed this to happen.  And I think on a 17-yr-old, 12 years is about right for this crime.  She should just admit it and let her family come to terms with it though, and give Daniel's family some small amount of peace.  Unforgiveable that they would attack Daniel's mom in such a personal way.  None of us are perfect.  She's been hurt enough.  For the kids' sake, Brandy should confess (didn't she already say, according to the how that he got what he deserved?) and her family should quit hearing what they want to hear. 
 
User Mood
Peaceful

Message Emote
blank
October 13, 2005, 6:04 pm PDT

10/13 Cheerleader Scandal

Quote From: truthyes

Dr Phil hit the nail on the head when he described the "accident" the way a prosecuter would.  This "sweet little angel" STOLE A CAR and then drove to her boyfriends house where she RAN INTO HIM AT 60-65 MILES PER HOUR after breaking up with him.  Then she proceeded to FLEE THE SCENE OF THE CRIME, drive home, and LIE TO HER PARENTS ABOUT HOW THE CAR WINDOW GOT SMASHED TO SMITHERINES.  What she did was willfull and if she is so insistent on it being an accident to appease her parents, then why in the heck doesn't she take a lie detector test to prove her innocence? 

  

BY THE WAY HOW WOULD THE BRANDI SUPPORTERS FEEL IF THE SITUATION WERE REVERSED AND DANIEL HAD STOLEN HIS MOM'S CAR, DRIVEN TO BRANDIS HOME, RUN HER DOWN AND LEFT HER CORPSE LYING IN THE ROAD FOR HER FAMILY TO FIND?  WOULD YOU BE AS COMPASSIONATE TOWARD HIM?   

I agree.  You have to look at her actions as a whole, and when you do, it's possible to believe she never thought it would kill him, but it's hard to believe she is innocent, as well.  It's easiest to believe she was young and stupid and out of control AND we musn't forget deceptive, which she clearly demonstrated with the tree branch and right on the interview telling Dr. Phil she didn't know she hit anyone.  RIGHT!  With a cracked windshield.  She's a liar.  The skid mark evidence is totally damning.  Now, having said that, I do believe he was probably an obsessed entitled boyfriend who was hard to disentangle from, maybe even a stalker type, since the family said they'd had to call police (though it's not on file - police found no cause to take report, but that happens all the time - doesn't mean it didn't happen).  He may have even placed himself in the path of her vehicle.  But evidence seems to suggest she went back to where he was, not the opposite.  No brake marks, people.  And I believe that he may have been abusive,  I think they probably had a very high-drama sick relationship on both sides, and she fed his acting out by doing things like - yes, sneaking a car out and coming over to get him stirred up.  They probably both needed counseling, and I would think it was fairly apparent since it sounded like a very chaotic relationship.
 
User Mood
Peaceful

Message Emote
blank
October 17, 2005, 11:28 am PDT

The difference between fan and stalker

There is nothing wrong with being an avid fan.  The difference between being a fan and a stalker is when you cease to care if your actions are affecting the celebrity in a negative way.  Just as with non-celebrity stalking, once you cross that line, it should be apparent to you and to the stalking victim that this is not motivated by love but by a self-esteem problem inside the stalker.  If it were love, you wouldn't want to inconvenience and frighten the person.  You may not think having someone outside your gate watching your house is threatening or that a celebrity might get nightmares from someone who writes regularly to say how they love them, but they do.   In the last few years, the public awareness of celebrity stalking has improved, and at this point, there is no excuse for ignorance.  You can no longer say, "I didn't know this would bother someone."  It's normal to go to concerts, because the artist expects to deal with the public there.  It's even fairly normal to wait by the stage door to get a quick autograph.  It is crossing the line to invade that person's privacy when they are not working. 

 
User Mood
Peaceful

Message Emote
blank
October 17, 2005, 11:29 am PDT

10/13 Cheerleader Scandal

Quote From: kbreau

 I think that no one knows the answers except for Brandi and Daniel. I think that everyone would feel the same towards Daniel if he were Brandi. The point is no one knows what really happened for sure. I don't think she should be locked up anymore if she is innocent. Why would she want to kill him? I dont believe for one moment that was ever her intention... why would she want to return her stuff? Why would she confess right away about what happened? Why would she be crying? You really believe that a 17 year old girl would want to kill a boy her age? I think if she was truly scared she would have gone to someone not KILL him!
Not true.  The physical evidence speaks to the truth. 
 
User Mood
Peaceful

Message Emote
blank
October 17, 2005, 2:15 pm PDT

What about your garden-variety obsessed sports fans?

I realize this program can only have so much in an hour, but we had two young women on who were obsessed with fans, but most men I know are completely obsessed with sports in general that if their team loses, they are completely depressed and feel worthless the next day.  I think overall, that is a much more prolific phenomenon, but no one ever acts like THEY have a problem.  Obviously there's a big segment of the population who need to identify with sports to give themselves an identity injection.  At least with musicians, there is some creative talent there to admire.  I think that's healthier than just admiring brute force, personally.  It doesn't seem like much to aspire to.  And I think there are FAR more children who get neglected by their sports-obsessed fathers than there are children who get neglected by their obsessed mothers.  FAR MORE. 

  

My advice to anyone who is unhealthily obsessed with ANYONE is to try to isolate the internal qualities you so admire in the person and just try to be more like them.  If the external is at the root of your obsession like it was with Mary Kate's fan, that's immediately NOT healthy, because placing THAT much emphasis on how one looks is unhealthy.  I'm sure that girl either had a weird upbringing or a trauma to have such low self-worth.  She was quite beautiful.  I just cringed on the final shot of her, which showed her trying to purse her lips like Mary Kate, which isn't an attractive maneuver to begin with and is just so embarrassingly sad to see emulated.   

  

 
User Mood
Peaceful

Message Emote
blank
October 19, 2005, 2:37 pm PDT

The Gay Cloister

It's true that that gayness often becomes more than just a sexual orientation and more of an identity for gay people, but that's because about the only place they find support is from within gay circles.  I'm not gay, but I've known lots of gays, lived in an apartment complex I didn't realize was gay when I moved in (guys) and got to know a bunch.  I was openminded even before then, having seen a young teenage male friend of mine struggle and be criticized and ostracized by his peers in the small conservative community.  I saw him struggle to not be gay, and it was very painful to watch and painful for his little confused girlfriends as well.  I don't know anyone who would CHOOSE to be gay.  I have a lot of  knowledge about violent crime and one thing I've learned from reading all the most cutting edge stuff on sexual offenders is that they are not rehabable.  Their idiosyncracies, because they are sexual, are innate .  They can't be rehabilitated because they were never any other way to go back to.  Trying to train a pedophile not to be attracted to children is the same as if someone tried to tell you not to be attracted to men (if you're a woman).  They should be restricted from society for life.  

  

There was a tremendous amount of resentment by the straight sister about her gay sister's having made gayness her entire identity.  I think she perceives it as self-important.  Even Dr. Phil didn't seem to get that gayness does become your identity many times.  As society becomes more tolerant and allows gay people to have the same rights as straight people, this division will greatly lesson, but right now, they are fighting a war.  And more power to them.  It's a shame that people embrace religions which exclude their children or that their own innate sense of morality doesn't overrule arcane literature and allow for reality. 

 
User Mood
Peaceful

Message Emote
blank
October 21, 2005, 1:58 pm PDT

Boutique Fairytale

I'm sure those two moms are envisioning a laid-back boutique with only the occasionaly walk-in customer and thinking they could just sit around leisurely and mind the tots while having a drink and a chat.  Of course, they COULD have a place like that, but if they don't have enough customers to make it impossible to sit around and drink and babysit, they won't make enough money to turn a profit.  I don't know what makes them think that anyone wants to shop in a place where you're assured of having to put up with fussy children either.  I certainly wouldn't.  I get enough of that at the grocery store and avoid it whenever possible.  These ladies should just join a health club or country club with an in-house nursery and do what they really want to do.  And I can't believe Dr. Phil kept referring to them as smart.  Maybe they are in some aspect, but certainly not in business.  They struck me as two women who have never even had a real job, or they'd KNOW how involved everything is.  I knew this by the time I was 21.
 
User Mood
Peaceful

Message Emote
blank
October 21, 2005, 2:04 pm PDT

Nail Polish holder

The thing that kills me about this product is that the thing preventing you from getting the last of the nail polish out of a bottle isn't a matter of tilting the bottle.  No matter whether you tilt the bottle or not, the brush is still going to go straight verticle in the bottle, and if it's low on polish, tilted, all the polish would be horizontal UNDER the brush and not any getting on the brush at all.  Plus, as anyone knows who does their own nails, once the polish gets very low, the polish is too gummed up to use anyway.  It's a ridiculous product that doesn't even work, which I think it's interesting no one commented on.  The sheer physics of it simply don't work.  For the teens, maybe a tray with a little slot on it for the bottle so it doesn't move around would be okay, but to sell, it, too, would need to be multiuse.  That poor man must so love his wife to have gone along with this really bad plan for this long.  Bless her heart for having a dream, but there is something going on with her that she has been in denial this long. 
 
User Mood
Peaceful

Message Emote
blank
October 21, 2005, 2:12 pm PDT

10/19 "I'm Gay, OK?"

Quote From: pilar5810

Dr. Phil is awesome.  Today, however, I think he's sidestepping the issue of having a gay child.  To advise the family to just not talk about the gay child's sex life is NOT the issue.  It's not simply about her SEX life.  It's about she's dating, who she's, how her heart is being broken, what activities she's filling her life with.  If she's volunteering at a gay youth center, should she not talk about that, too?  She can't talk about herself with very much depth, without hitting something gay-related.    

  

For right now, that girl seems very immersed in being gay.  She wants to share her life with her family.  This daughter is looking for love from her mother, and doesn't find it in the rings and money that her mom is giving her.  Couldn't you have helped the family see what they might lose if they try to apply the "don't ask, don't tell" policy to this sweet girl?  

I know it's not what any counselor would advise, but I know what I'd have done if I was in the gay daughter's position with her family.  I'd have left them behind.  There's just too much pain and they're not willing to budge at all and are just conspiring against her and outright withholding their love on any subject they disapprove of, like discussing her well-being, which is all tied up with her relationships.  I had no sympathy for the mom or the sister.  They only want to love her on their terms.  And honestly, I don't think there's any love on the sister's part.  I've seen a lot of gays struggle with their families and I've come to believe that you give it your best shot at being honest and trying to help them understand and give them some time to adjust, because it is hard.  But if they are too rigid to do anything but hurt you, your only remaining chance at getting them to come around is by staying away.  If that doesn't make them re-examine their ethics, nothing will, and there's no point in nurturing an abusive relationship with them for the rest of your lives.  When I was young, I finally felt I had to cut off my mom over some issues, and it wasn't until I did that she finally made a decision to accept me for who I was.
 

First | Prev | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Next | Last
Return to Message Board