User Mood Stressed
Message Emote
|
August 6, 2006, 12:46 pm PDT
Should We Teach Creation or Evolution in Our Schools?
Quote From: julie1418ummmm.....I am not an atheist, and I'm not sure what your point is. There is a BIG difference between not shooting down a child's belief in God and actively teaching creationism in a science classroom. I often had to teach things that could run contrary to a child's belief system...it wasn't that difficult to respect religion without teaching, or "giving a nod", to it. You can tell a child that there is not enough scientific evidence to support Creationism to call it factual, despite the fact that many people believe in it. You can also stress that you do not need the child to BELIEVE in Evolution over Creationism, but the child does need to understand Evolution as part of science.
Are you sure you understand what constitutes a fact? Your examples are weak or flat out wrong. It was NEVER a FACT in Hitler's Germany that Jews were the source of evil....it may have been a widely held belief, but that does not constitute a fact. If I were to say, Michael Jordan was the greatest basketball player ever, that also is NOT a fact. It may be true, it may be widely believed, but there is not a measurement system for "greatest player". If I wanted to illustrate his greatness in terms of factual evidence, I would have to provide a statistic, most points, most championships, most MVPs, whatever....and even then, the statistics may be factual, but the term greatest player is still just an opinion.
Same thing with the Earth being flat...there was NO evidence to support it, it was never measured or seen. So using the scientific basis for what constitutes a fact, the Earth being flat was merely a widely held belief. First, my reply was not to your message, it was to purples. Maybe my reference to Hitler's Germany doesn't qutie constitute a fact (I was really tired when I wrote it). My point with facts was that they change with the knowledge of the times. Would you agree that Pluto is the last planet in our solar system? At this point, it is a fact. What if, with the advancement of technology, another planet is discovered or it was discovered that Pluto is not actually a planet but part of an asteroid belt? (both are currently theories) Then Pluto would not be the last planet in the solar system, and the fact would change. Facts can also be false. A fact does not have to be true to be a fact. If I said the sky was purple, you could go outside and see that it is not, disproving it. It is still a fact, just a false one. Hundreds of years ago, when all believed the Earth was flat, that was a fact, it was just a false fact. I reference the definition right out of the dictionary: "Something believed to be true or real: a document laced with mistaken facts." I never said that I would get get up and give a lesson on Adam and Eve or any other creationism story. No teacher has to, the kids could tell it to you. But, I am not going to tell them that they have to believe in evolution....as you just said. My beef is with Purple, who, it seems, wants me to tell a kid that Darwin's theory of evolution is how we absolutely came to be.
|