Messages By: jensen33

   VooDoo, Spell Casters, Black Majick........I believe people can become afflicted by evil in this way when it is sought by another person.  That is VERY REAL, from what I can tell.  However, another person must do this to you.  Anybody who would dabble in such wicked things is most certainly motivated by Satan, because he is the force behind evil.  I think when people are victims of a spell, sometimes they do not even know it, and it was put upon them by very wicked, evil people, who love Satan and his false promises, and who do not love people or JESUS.  These people who send negative energy to innocent people are in league with Satan.  Does anybody reading this remember the song "The Devil went down to Georgia"?  Well it completely frightened me as a child.  That awful fiddle sounded so wicked!  I was about 7 years old, and I lay in bed awake at night thinking that if the Devil went down to Georgia, then surely he could come to Michigan.  Yes, as an adult I believe he can come to Michigan, or wherever you are, but he no longer scares me.  If you rebuke him in the name of Jesus, he will have no choice but to stay away from you.  He gains power when people do not resist him, and he goes after you when you are weak.  To CHOOSE to cast evil energy at another person....the person who does that will have to answer for that one day.  I also strongly believe you reap what you sow.   

As far as spirits in the material world, yes,  it has not happened to me that I know of, but I believe spirits can return to the material world, and they also sometimes hang around where they died if they do not realize they have died yet.  (And of course our spirit lives forever, so it needs to change planes of existence and go to the light...HEAVEN).  I believe spirits can come back to a house where they lived or to the property where a house they lived in was, or they merely delay going to the "other side," and I do not believe their purpose is to harm the person living there.    As far as a spirit entering your body and possessing you, I believe it can happen, but it is my opinion that a true possession would be EXTREMELY rare.  I liked Dr. Phil's explanation about the use of positive symbols, and having a cross over one's bed.  All of this is very interesting to me, because I think there most certainly is more to our lives than what meets the eye.  

You are right about your interpretation of what Dr. Phil said.  He also discusses this in one of his books where he is defining and discussing what each family member's role should be.  There is a special section on blended families, and I agree wholeheartedly with what he says.  Step-parents should stay out of the discipline arena, unless they are enforcing an already defined rule.  I would personally say, "I am going to let your father know about this just as soon as he gets home," if I were a step-mother.  Then, my husband would need to consistenty enforce whatever discipline he deemed appropriate.   

He is a good lawyer who cares about people.  He fights to the end for his clients.  He does not like doing divorce cases for this very reason--because the children suffer, and he cannot bear to see it.  However, he is a court-appointed guardian ad litum, for several children, meaning, if someone is not taking care of a child appropriately, they will have to answer to him.  In fact, he has the power to take a child to the doctor himself if the foster parent neglects to, and can even petition the court to remove the child, whatever is in the child's best interest.   

I am sorry you ran up with a lawyer who did not care about your best interests, but not all lawyers are like that.  My bf's cell phone rings at all hours from clients, and he ethically and vigorously represents them.  In fact, I would hate to have to go up against him in court.  I know some lawyers just don't care because he tells me so.   Please don't give up.  Lawyers who just take people's money and don't fight for them ought to be ashamed of themselves.  You can petition the court to review the custody order citing your child's unhappiness.  Look in your area if there are any legal aid societies for people who cannot afford an attorney.  Surely this is an injustice to you and your son, and his emotional needs are important to the court.  Good luck, and hang in there!  

What Dr. Phil was saying is that a psychologist would supervise the visit while the visit is happening.  The little girl would not go home with her dad, he would have to meet her and the psychologist perhaps at like the office of the psychologist.  In this way, the child can get to know him, and the psychologist would be observing his interactions with her, probably through a one-way mirror, or even may actually be in the room, I am not sure, probably so in the beginning.   I am certain Chris will have to prove that all drugs and alcohol are out of his system for an extended period of time before any psychologist would deem him safe to spend time with this child unsupervised, and also he would have to show no encounters with the law, and better impulse control.  The therapy Dr. Phil offered Chris will help him learn about himself and how to make better decisions.    If he truly wants a relationship with his daughter, he will most definitely have to prove himself.  Chris needs to learn that being in a situation that he needs to allegedly react in self-defense is no situation his daughter needs to be around.  The psychologist will help Chris to realize this. 

We are products of a combination of our biology and our environment.  Sad thing to me is this....to think of what kind of upbringing Chris must have had, and what kind of abuse he must have suffered, and what poor role-models he must have had, to develop into such a self-destructive person, and one who perpetrates violence and abuse onto other people and onto animals.  It bothered me too that nothing was his fault, like "where is the report?"  If someone killed my cat, I personally would have them prosecuted for animal crelty, and then I would sue them in civil court for my loss of personal property, and I would definitely keep the report.  Chris is definitely in a place where he does not recognize why he would be considered a danger to his child, but the psychological intervention I am sure will last over an extended period of time, and hopefully help him alot.   

I do think that the way this man was hurting over not being able to see his child was not an act.  I hope he can get himself turned around, because psychological pain is some of the most difficult pain to feel.  I am thankful for the upbringing I had, I sort of had an idyllic childhood, filled with trips to the beach, playing outside with my brother, and eating ice cream cones.  Surely Chris did not have an idyllic childhood.  Perpetrating violence onto others is a learned behavior.  He was either abused, or social learning theory would indicate his role models were violent.  The mark of an excellent psychologist, which I believe Dr. Phil is, was giving Chris a healthy dose of reality, but doing so with empathy, and obviously Dr. Phil cared enough about him to extend him the counseling he so obviously needs.  Chris did show enough social skills to know to say thank-you, he actually said it twice, and when someone gives you the chance to turn your life around, thank-you is definitely in order.    

Writing Chris off as a human being because of his past is callous and not fair.  He deserves a chance to prove himself, and it is actually his right.  We are all works in progress, and unfortunately the playing field is not level.  Chris's start in life was indeed shaky, and he may not ever get better, but I hope for him, his daughter's mother, and his daughter, that he does.