Message Boards

Messages By: julie1418

User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
February 19, 2009, 12:55 pm PST

News, Politics and Current Events

Quote From: ritehere

Methinks the two are locked in a battle to convince the other of things neither is about to consider.

I'm sure your ideas are not so "out there" as you think.

I too, don't expect anybody else to believe as I do, because I'm comfortable with huge gray areas when it comes to God. I believe that each and every major religion owns a piece of the puzzle, and it's to be found in the original concepts, not in the rituals, traditions, and trappings that came later.

Actually, I suspect my spiritual beliefs are pretty close to your and Kathleen's. I enjoy debating, and for me, the debate is not about God or Jesus as much as it is about whether or not slavery is condoned in the Bible. I am not an atheist, and it is not my intention to repudiate God. I feel like when you debate the Bible, you are pretty much playing on the believer's "turf", so I approach it from that angle.

 

I have been asked before (I have done quite a bit of religious debating) why I don't offer up my own beliefs for debate. It is simply because I don't feel anyone else has to live by my beliefs just like I don't want to have to live by anyone else's beliefs. I feel pretty strongly (obviously!) about the separation of church and state for that reason.

 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
February 20, 2009, 1:38 pm PST

News, Politics and Current Events

Quote From: kustomlady

So it would not be okay with you OR God to have slavery now as they did in the Bible? So why was it okay then?

 

I already told you... BECAUSE their hearts were hardened.

 

According to your religious beliefs, isn't the Bible the inerrant word of God?

 

Specifically, I believe the Bible is a compilling of historical documentations, inspired by God, so that we could know of the charactor of God... how God relates to humans and how humans can relate to God.

 

His instruction book for how we are to live so that we might earn salvation?

 

No, it is an instruction book for how we can receive salvation... and how we can please God.

 

And although through the Bible he condemns many customary practices of the times, he can't bring Himself to deny SLAVERY.

 

What many customary practices of the times are you talking about?

 

If God was okay with those restrictions THEN, it stands to reason that he would be okay with that form of slavery NOW.

 

Only if slavery legally existed now, which it does not... thank God!

I already told you... BECAUSE their hearts were hardened.

 

So God makes his moral judgments based on the whims and hearts of humans?

 

No, it is an instruction book for how we can receive salvation... and how we can please God.

 

And apparently, owning and beating other people does not displease God....otherwise, it would be in the instruction book.

 

What many customary practices of the times are you talking about?

 

Let me preface this by stating I am not going to quibble over the term "customary practices". There are many instances in the Bible of God telling people what they can and cannot do. Let's start with your favorite....homosexuality. According to you, God made his displeasure at homosexuality pretty well known....his hands are tied over the issue of slavery because "mens' hearts were hardened", but he doesn't hold back when their mmmm hmmmmm's are hardened? (Crass, I know...sometimes I can't resist a dirty little pun....and this one was too easy ;)

 

So, homosexuality is an ABOMINATION...and we needn't try to look at the context of homosexuality during Biblical Times (Prostitution, rape, fertility rituals to other gods, dominance over conquered nations), but slavery...well, what's a God to do? Their hearts were hardened.

 

We also have the Ten Commandments....two of which deal with the emotion of jealousy. So coveting someone's stuff or spouse warrants a THOU SHALT NOT from God...but slavery...well, whatcha gonna do? Their hearts were hardened.

 

Only if slavery legally existed now, which it does not... thank God!

 

So God makes his moral decisions based on the laws of man? If slavery was legal, God would be okay with it, with a few restrictions? I don't know why you are thanking God for ending slavery, apparently He had nothing to do with it.

 

Do you think God is okay with EVERYTHING that is legal today?

 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
February 20, 2009, 2:00 pm PST

News, Politics and Current Events

Quote From: getrealtime

Thats one of the parts in the bible that I just can't grasp, Why hardened their hearts????

 

as for Is God ok with everything that is legal today, It says in the Bible to follow the law of the land. But then you have Gods laws.

My personal belief is that the Bible is more a documentation of the culture and beliefs of the times. Otherwise, a good God would have had something to say about slavery other than simply regulating it.

 

If I were to take the position of a Bible Believer, I guess I would have to follow the law of the land, but follow the dictates of the bible in my personal life. Abortion may be legal, but it is not mandatory, for example. If gay marriage becomes legal, it won't be mandatory.

 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
February 20, 2009, 2:08 pm PST

News, Politics and Current Events

Quote From: getrealtime

Obama might be a great speech giver but he is not a leader, His experience or lack of it is showing.

I can't say that one thing he has done or said has changed my opinion, The fear is raising from his lack of leadership, This Spending bill is not going to help, It didn't work for FDR and its not going to work now. I wish he would look to JFK and see what he did to make the economy strong instead of modeling off of failures.

 

If it gets only as bad as Carter admin. we might concider ourselfs lucky ugh!!

 

Happy Birthday to Holly 21 wow those where the days.

 

I was telling Greg that Alex is 15 only a few more years with her and then a few more with Gage and then no more huges in the  morning and kisses at night and that felt odd to me, I know we have plans and all but its going to be different from the unit we have now.

 

J.

Just so you know..when Kennedy cut the top marginal rates, they were 91%. He cut them to 70%. It is currently, I believe, 35%. It is not an exact mathematical comparison because of inflation and the income cut off for to rates waas different, but Obama can't really steal a page from Kennedy's playbook...different circumstances and the top tax rates were much higher when Kennedy cut them.
 

First | Prev | 213 | 214 | 215 | 216 | 217 | 218 | Next Page | Last Page
Return to Message Board