Message Boards

Messages By: joyfuller

User Mood
Mellow

Message Emote
blank
April 21, 2006, 1:52 pm PDT

Didn't want to be a WHAT?

When I saw the show today, I wanted to scream at the guy who didn't want to be a father. If he didn't want the responsibility, then she shouldn't have had SEX with her! This subject is VERY close to me. My son's father and I are in this same battle. I have endometriosis and was told I'd never have children. 10 years of no protection and no children, I believed it. I used a condom one time, got pregnant. Lost that baby and the Doctor put me on the pill. Two months later, here comes Jacob, my son. The only difference, he didn't show up  the hospital when our son was born, he refused to sign the birth certificate, and has been running form social services for almost 3 years now. When he left us, he only took the clothes on his back and ALL of the money we had to our names. There was no food in the house, and I had no way of getting any money to put food in the house. FORTUNATELY my exhusband and I are friends and he helped us out. I can't believe that people have such a huge problem with responsibility when it comes to babies. Why is it a problem that women have all of the legal say so with pregnancy? Who is it that has to step up to the plate when the guy decides he's had enough, doesn't want to be a father, or thinks it's ok to get as many girls pregnant as he possibly can just because he's got the sperm? Let's see...... it seems to me that the WOMAN has to take the slack there. Don't get me wrong, I realize that there are some women that abandon their children, but I have a sneaky feeling that the numbers aren't equal. I know that in MY case Jeremy is the father of 4 children that we know of. Tow of his daughters are in Maryland, another daughter in Tennesee, and then our son. I'm not saying that today's guy HAS done that, but if he wins this suit, who's to say he won't become another Jeremy? Who's to say that winning his suot wouldn't pave the way for future Jeremy's? WHO is going to protect the CHILDREN in these cases? Let's be real here! 

 
User Mood
Mellow

Message Emote
hopeful
April 21, 2006, 1:59 pm PDT

I agree

Quote From: alleyg

Sex is fun, and sex makes babies. If you are really opposed to having children, then you should not be having sex.   

   

Yes, women have alot of power. We put out or not. We abort or not. I understand how that can seem terribly unfair. But here's the flip side. We carry the baby. We loose bone and blood for them We sit up at night while they cry. We take lesser jobs so we can spend time with them.   

   

Men do none of these things. I have been in a situation where I was on the pill and got pregnant anyhow. I chose to keep my son, how could i not, the creator himself chose me to raise him. I was young and poor and had to take state health insurance (medicaid).   

   

To get the medicaide,  I had to tell who the father was, even though he didn't want anything to do with us. I know for a fact that he has a support order against him that he isn't paying.   

   

BUT THAT ISN"T THE POINT  

   

The point is what is best for the baby. I have a child, that fact alters my life permanetly, If the guy has to pay a little child support, then so be it. But if he was so opposed to being a father, he should have gotten himself fixed. Its a quick and easy operation done in an out patient setting.  

I totaly agree with you and am in the same situation. The father isn't by chance Jeremy Burker is he? I know there are tons of us out there with the same story. The state of Virginia only hekps but so much in finding these dads. with my case, they closed it because after a year of sending letters to his Mom's address they couldn't find him. So, I get to raise my son by myself, with very little help from the State, no help from Jeremy, and all of the questions my Jacob will have when he's older.
 

First Page | Previous Page | 1 | Next Page | Last Page
Return to Message Board