Message Boards

Messages By: sgpvt2004

User Mood
Sad

Message Emote
blank
April 21, 2006, 2:36 pm PDT

get a clue

Quote From: cosonov

  The fact that they had discussed the reprecautions of pregnancy, and how it was not a great time to have a child, should deter any legal action taken against the father. The woman should not be allowed to renegg on her decision to not have a baby. If anything, the father should be charging her with breach of verbal contract!  Too many woman are having 'cute little babies' just to say they have them. It's almost like an accessory in some cases. Leave the father alone. He made his position clear much before the night of conception!
I guess mistakes never happen huh...verbal contract...how about the use of a condom..or better yet DO NOT HAVE SEX IF YOU DO NOT WANT TO TAKE CARE OF A CHILD!!!!!  There are NO guarantees to not have a child..whether a woman was told she could not have kids or not...the only way to ensure you are not going to create a child is to not have sex...plain and simple!
 
User Mood
Sad

Message Emote
blank
April 21, 2006, 2:37 pm PDT

he does have a choice

Quote From: cgeorge22

Matt is 100% right.  His constitutional and privacy rights are being viloated.  In this day and age, HE CERTAINLY SHOULD HAVE A CHOICE!   

  

I URGE EVERYONE TO SUPPORT THIS!  WRITE YOUR LOCAL CONGRESSMEN AND SENATORS AND TELL THEM TO SUPPORT ROE vs WADE for MEN. 

  

  

  

  

  

DO NOT HAVE SEX!!!  KEEP HIS PANTS ON!!  USE A CONDOM...BUT THE IS NOT ALWAYS FOOL PROOF!!!  WHEN HE CAN CARRY A CHILD HE WILL GET THE CHOICE.
 

First Page | Previous Page | 1 | Next Page | Last Page
Return to Message Board