Quote From: broker1I think we as a society have this compulsion to accuse someone before we get all the facts.
Obviously, we want to protect the child in any way we can; however I'm opposed to creating a trial
atmosphere. I'm against doing these type of shows where there is so much gray area. We are
not sure who is telling the truth and we have to be careful before we make accusations that may
not hold up. So much of the news we get today is distorted. Yes, locking the door raises some
serious questions. When the role is reversed from mothers with their sons changing diapers,
do we question what they do? If the child is violated and there is evidence to support the allegations, then the consequences should fit the crime; but before we go off the deep end
and and with a "hang him attitude"; Be careful and make sure you have your facts correct!
I don't think we have to be so careful in a case like this.
A child is clinging for life on her Mom, says she don't
like her father, don't want to go with him and tells
'they touch my peepee'? Did you hear her the childs
heart, the tone, the words spoken? Did you see the look
in that little girls eyes? The Mom in no way should be held
in such a high restraint rule, I would be petrified to let
my daughter go too, how does one let go of their child
when they beg and plea with so much pain and fear
showing? If taking a chance some adult is accused
verses a child in danger well error of judgement should
always go with the child. What are you talking about with
Mothers changing diapers? Why would he need to change
his daughters diaper anyways, he hadn't seen this child
in about 2 years? The door locked? Evidence? She had
to be taken to the ER, he'd do that because it was the only
possible way to have it handled and only chance to protect
himself. He probably did think he could manipulate the
professional Doctors. Most sex offenders are very skilled
at manipulating.