Quote From: gwarrior6
I don't know if I'd attribute school shootings to not spanking, I think those kids have problems that spanking could never correct (more like psychoactive medication). There are some kids who will rebel no matter what you do. Anyway, I have some articles for and against it, thought it might be interesting.
Here are some interesting articles relating to it:
Spanking may be ineffective because it does not teach an alternative behavior (American Academy of Pediatrics, 1995). In fact, children usually feel resentful, humiliated, and helpless after being spanked (Samalin & Whitney, 1995). The primary lesson they learn appears to be that they should try harder not to get caught.
http://www.kidsource.com/kidsource/content4/spanking.morph.html
The bible is often used to support, even perhaps to require, that parents use corporal punishment on children. Many clergy today are speaking out against that interpretation of scripture. The Reverend Dr. Thomas E. Sagendorf, retired Methodist Minister, says the following I can find no sanction in the teaching of Jesus or the witness of the New Testament to encourage the practice of corporal punishment at home, school or anywhere else. A number of popular voices take a different view, often quoting Old Testament scriptures to prove their point. Those who subscribe to this argument misunderstand and misuse scripture.
http://www.stophitting.com/disathome/factsAndFiction.php
For purposes of the child abuse law, parental discipline through spanking may not be justifiable if the child is bruised or otherwise injured. Thus, spanking is not illegal, but injuring a child is.
According to the academy [American Academy of Pediatrics, effective discipline has three key components: first, a loving, supportive relationship between parent and child; second, use of positive reinforcement when children behave well; and third, use of punishment when children misbehave.
According to Physician magazine, spanking should be used selectively for clear, deliberate misbehavior, especially a child's persistent defiance of a parent. It should be used only when the child receives at least as much praise for good behavior as correction for problem behavior. Verbal correction, time out and logical consequences should be used initially, followed by spanking when noncompliance persists. Only a parent should administer a spanking, not another person. Spanking should never be administered on impulse or when a parent is out of control. Parents sometimes need a time out too. Spanking is inappropriate before 15 months of age, should be less necessary after 6 years, and rarely, if ever, used after 10 years of age.
http://www.tldm.org/news6/child.discipline.htm
Also, there are numerous links to Christian sites that oppose spanking:
http://stoptherod.net/links.html
Anyway, thought you might find these interesting.
"According to Physician magazine, spanking should be used selectively for clear, deliberate misbehavior, especially a child's persistent defiance of a parent. It should be used only when the child receives at least as much praise for good behavior as correction for problem behavior. Verbal correction, time out and logical consequences should be used initially, followed by spanking when noncompliance persists. Only a parent should administer a spanking, not another person. Spanking should never be administered on impulse or when a parent is out of control. Parents sometimes need a time out too. Spanking is inappropriate before 15 months of age, should be less necessary after 6 years, and rarely, if ever, used after 10 years of age."
This is my belief. This is exactly the form of spanking I'm talking about. Yes, I have spanked my children, no I don't regret it. I also ALWAYS praise them to the point that sometimes I wonder if I praise them too much. My children have very big heads! When I tell them they're beautiful or smart or anything like that, their response is uh huh or I know. It's very cute. My husband and I actually have joked about asking Dr Phil if it's possible to give your kids too much self esteem!
"Spanking may be ineffective because it does not teach an alternative behavior (American Academy of Pediatrics, 1995). In fact, children usually feel resentful, humiliated, and helpless after being spanked (Samalin & Whitney, 1995). The primary lesson they learn appears to be that they should try harder not to get caught.
http://www.kidsource.com/kidsource/content4/spanking.morph.html"
I can see how some children who maybe aren't in a truly loving environment. (That doesn't mean the parents don't love their kids, it means maybe they don't show it properly) might learn to hide the behavior instead of stopping the behavior, but as I've stated, my children have no problem talking to me about anything. They will initiate the conversation if they've done something wrong, they will initiate the conversation if one of their friends does something wrong. They always come to me with any questions, we have had conversations very recently at their request that involved drugs, smoking, sex, you name it. And as I stated in a previous post, my sons had the chance to disobey me the other night and not get caught. They chose to call me and tell me and have me come pick them up instead.
"For purposes of the child abuse law, parental discipline through spanking may not be justifiable if the child is bruised or otherwise injured. Thus, spanking is not illegal, but injuring a child is."
I absolutely agree with this. There is no excuse to leave a mark or injure a child. The parent that does that is OUT OF CONTROL and has no business touching a child. I've never left a mark on my children and the one time my ex did, he was no longer allowed to spank them. He didn't believe in spanking but he hauled off and spanked my daughter 1 time and that 1 time he left a pretty good red mark on her. He has never touched any of them again and if he did, there would be hell to pay.
"According to the academy [American Academy of Pediatrics], effective discipline has three key components: first, a loving, supportive relationship between parent and child; second, use of positive reinforcement when children behave well; and third, use of punishment when children misbehave"
This goes right along with my belief as well. Above all else, I make sure my children know they are loved, I support them, I use positive reinforcement on a daily basis. They only get in trouble once or twice a month and even then, it's generally not enough to warrant a spanking.
"I don't know if I'd attribute school shootings to not spanking, I think those kids have problems that spanking could never correct (more like psychoactive medication). There are some kids who will rebel no matter what you do. Anyway, I have some articles for and against it, thought it might be interesting."
So that we are all on the same page, I'm not only talking about spanking the children who end up out of control and shooting people. For one, I'm talking about spanking them, not beating them, and for two, I'm talking about spanking all the little bullies and crap starters at the schools that torment them every day of their lives.
Thanks for the articles, and I hope I have shed a little more light on my form of discipline. Maybe some people can understand that spanking is a whole different ballgame than abuse and it does not harm a child if that child is on stable ground from a loving home.