Message Boards

Messages By: pm2kar

User Mood
Mellow

Message Emote
blank
May 9, 2007, 12:45 am PDT

He's Wrong, But So Is She

I agree with Dr. Phil that the situation in the household has to end. BUT! I DO agree with the stepdad's frustration at getting no respect from the kids, namely the boy. He's the way he is BECAUSE the mother never taught him any responsibility. The stepdad walked into the situation and thought he could change it and failed. NO, I don't agree with the way he's tried to do it, but he's NOT the only one at fault.

 

Over 20 years ago, I made the unfortunate mistake of marrying an older woman with 5 kids. One boy, next to the oldest, one girl, the oldest, and 3 girls younger. Her husband was killed in a farm accident some years prior. Things went well until around 5 months into the marriage. All hell broke loose, mainly caused by two of the girls, 16 and 14 at the time. Between bailing them out of jail and them wrecking every vehicle but mine, since I wouldn't let them go near it, it was nearly total chaos. Their mother did absolutely nothing in the way of discipline, and at first wanted me to get after them. As soon as I did, she pulled the rug out from under me. From that point on, if I said anything at all to them, it was, "Oh, go F___K yourself." No repercussions. No nothing. I became nothng more than the house eunuch.

 

When it got to the point where the 14 year old was allowed to take her mother's new car to school WITHOUT a license, that was it for me.  She'd run her foul mouth once too often on the school bus and there was two or three other girls waiting to close it for her.

 

I wasn't about to get hung on a lawsuit if she wrecked it and killed someone, so I finally packed up and left. It was just in time. She wrecked it less than a month later, drunk out of her mind.

 

No, I think the stepdad is wrong, but I fully understand his frustration. Whether you agree with me or not, it started with their mother's lack of discipline. THAT is where the lack of respect started. They will never respect ANY man foolish enough to get involved with her, should this guy finally leave. My sympathy goes out to them all.

 

I was raised with the back of my father's hand upside my head more than once. Was it right? Probably not. Did it scar me? No, not as far as I can see. My dad and I never really got along for many reasons, and not necessarily that. He DID say, many years ago, that I would either fear him, or I'd respect him, and he didn't care which one it was. Truthfully, I did both at times. Back then, there were LIMITS. There was a line you didn't cross, and unless you were exceedingly stupid, you didn't cross it very often.

 

Would I do the same today? Not to the same extent, but there is NO accountability for today's kids, either. When I was young, you KNEW what would happen if you got too far out of line. There is a time to talk and a time for talking to stop. If I'd have been dumb enough to give my father the finger, like this kid has been doing, they likely would've been prying me out of the sidewalk, and I would have deserved it. You might have wanted to a few times when I was coming up, but DO it? Not unless you liked an almost inconcievable amount of pain.

 

I can well imagine the good Dr. won't agree with much of what I'm saying here, but I make no apologies, either.

 

I didn't turn into an axe murderer or the Boston Strangler because I got my butt beat occasionally. I DID know the meaning of boundaries, and that I was responsible for my actions. I've never been in legal trouble. I never destroyed anyone's property, used any kind of drugs or broke into houses. After that unfortunate mistake of a marriage, it took a few years to find the wonderful wife I had for 11 years. I lost her to brain cancer in 1999, at the age of 48.

 

Consequences. Something this ridiculous "time out" generation would never understand.

 
User Mood
Mellow

Message Emote
blank
May 9, 2007, 12:55 am PDT

Remove the kids?

Quote From: honeesmom

 Dear Dr. Phil,

As a social service professional,andasamother of three children, I must tell you that I am frustrated atthe outcome of this program.  I realize that you will bemonitoring this family, and if need be, you will take action to remove the children from this unhealthy, horrific and damaging environment.. However, I must asky ou why,as a mandated reporter, you did not contact DCFS and request that they look into removing the children asap?

I  was sad,angry,and Ifelt impotient that I could not assist these innocent victims. I have some empathy for the mother as I haveheardherexcuses before,and although there areavenues opentoher,Ido understand herfear..  I even have someempathyforthestep-father,as I stronglybelieve that he needsimmediateassistance. Nevertheless, theneeds of the children mustcome beforeassistance to eitherrparent is given. I stronglyfeel thatthesechildren should beremoved from the home,and althoughfostercare,orther care given tothem by a relative may by no stretchoftheimagination be ideal, atthis point, it is my firm suggestionthatitwould be an improvement totheir present living conditions.

Perhapsbothofthe parents arevictims of society, or early adulthood, but atthepresentthe childrenare the victims, and this shouldhavebeendealtwithimmediately. Dr. Phil, unless Imissedsomething,Ithinkthat  you goofed.

Sincerely yours,

Social Services, as far as I'm concerned, has caused more family breakups than any other reason I can think of. CPS isn't the answer to every family problem. Pull the kids out and so what? Put them in Foster Care? Sure, like that will help.

 

You need to keep your family-wrecking organization OUT of things.

 
User Mood
Mellow

Message Emote
blank
May 9, 2007, 1:10 am PDT

05/02 Bully Dads

Quote From: lyninsocal

I'm SICK of the way everybody blames the woman. 

 

 

 

 

She is EXACTLY where the blame starts. It's clear she NEVER  taught her son manners OR respect for his elders.

 

The bottom line is this. Social Services, the government and all these "experts" need to get the hell OUT of the home and give the power to parent BACK to parents.

 
User Mood
Mellow

Message Emote
blank
October 29, 2007, 10:14 pm PDT

15 year olds Know Right from Wrong!

Dr.Phil won't ever agree with me, but neither he nor anyone else is going to convince me this girl didn't know EXACTLY what she was doing. Granted, this guy should have known better than to engage in sex with jailbait, yes, but he has a point when he said there was a difference between consensual sex and forcible rape. What he did was illegal, but I don't think he should spend the rest of his life in jail for it.

 

That's my opinion. Fire away.

 
User Mood
Mellow

Message Emote
blank
October 30, 2007, 12:01 am PDT

Screwed Blue and Tatooed

This snake of a woman gets away with paternal fraud, then sits there and laughs in her ex-husband's face? Gloria Allred is exactly what the husband's new wife said she was, a hired gun. She's sells her outrageous mouth to anyone that will pay her price. I was elated to see the "men4Justice" fellow actually take the wind out that lousy, man-hating shyster's sails for once.

What NERVE to say he should STILL have child support extorted from him simply because he thought he was the kid's father, according to his lying, cheating, bottom-feeding ex-wife? The ONLY thing I think he did wrong was the manner in which he informed his child. And, he should have kept in contact with her. It truly wasn't her fault.

 

Men have been getting screwed (no pun intended) by the courts and underhanded, lying, vindictive women for too long. Now an organization that enables men to fight back against these outrageous, outdated and grossly unfair laws is gaining strength. Those women low enough to be trolling for a naive meal ticket to an easy life will gradually find it much harder to rip off unsuspecting men. I say "Bravo!"

 

Though it happened to me years ago, I know too well what being lied to feels like, then standing helpless as the courts helped my ex steal nearly everything I had, was well as trash my life, reputation and credit.  The downside to my experience has left me wary of almost any woman to this day.

 

Men are almost completely powerless in today's society. A less than honest woman can ruin your life with one lie and a phone call. I may never live long enough to see these outrageous laws changed towards givng men some control of their lives back, but I will never again hand any woman the power to ruin my life. I may sleep alone these days, but I no longer sleep with one eye open. Trading occasional warmth for the ability to safeguard my well-being seems a fair trade.

If I ever win the lottery, Men4Justice will get a healthy donation. 

 
User Mood
Mellow

Message Emote
blank
October 30, 2007, 12:34 am PDT

10/29 Parent Trap

Quote From: daddio209

Wow , Get some help please.

You worked with abused kids? Maybe you took one too many hits to the head in your own pathetic life. Gloria Allred is a paid, for-hire windbag of a mouthpiece for anyone foolish enough to pay her outrageous fee.
 
User Mood
Mellow

Message Emote
blank
October 30, 2007, 12:44 am PDT

10/29 Parent Trap

Quote From: angperez

I'm a 36 year mother and have a 15 year old son from a previous marriage. 

It wasn't until my current/2nd marriage that I learned how easy it was for a woman to put anyones name on the birth certificate and collect support.  It happened to my current husband when his ex girlfriend needed or wanted welfare/medical... all she had to do was indicate who the father was!... because she couldn't find the actual biological father... it was easy for her to write my husbands name down as the father since he is the father of the oldest. When we received the court orders for support, I encouraged the paternity test because she was still denying that she didn't write his name down. It took about 3 months and cost us about $2500 to prove he was NOT the father! 

 

Why do we make it alright for a woman to play with everyones emotions when it comes to their kids? I know there are cases of men doing this too. But in this specific case dont blame the dad for stepping up then stepping down as his title and heart was ripped from him without warning. It was neither his fault nor the childs and I agree the child should NOT have been put in the front line of the firing post!! The mother should pay a major price as she fraudulently accused an innocent man of a devastating lie!  She played with everyones emotions for obvious financial support but at the expense of her daughters and ex-husband right to know SHAME ON MOM!   

 

 

The $2500 it cost you to beat that lying woman at her own game is far cheaper than 19 years of paying outrageous child supprt and having those man-hating dykes from Child Support Enforcement always chasing you down for more and more of your money. You got off cheap. Be thankful.

 

As for that "mother," she should be thrown in a hole so deep they'd have to pump sunshine to her. She's the poster child for how easy it is for women like her to legally steal a man's hard earned money for years and completely get away with it, courtesy of stupid court judges.

 
User Mood
Mellow

Message Emote
blank
October 30, 2007, 1:16 am PDT

10/29 Parent Trap

Quote From: princess1

Women who pass their kids off as someone else's should be ashamed of themselves.  It is women like that who make it hard for women like me.  My ex husband has been denying our 18 year old son since before he was born.  Never mind that I have always been willing to have my son tested.  He is over $20.000 behind in child support and hasn't seen my son in 11 years.  I thank God for my current husband; a real man who has taken on the responsibility of being my son's "dad".

Women who rip off men like Maria do it because they KNOW there are no repercussions, and the courts will do nothing to them. Take it from one who's been on the receiving end. The screwing you get ain't worth the screwing you got.

 
User Mood
Mellow

Message Emote
blank
October 30, 2007, 11:06 am PDT

10/29 Parent Trap

Quote From: ncdad54

The Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) was passed into law in 1994 during the Bill Clinton administration. As seasoned lawyers, Bill and Hillary Clinton knew and understood that VAWA violates the Constitutional guarantee of equal protection under the law because VAWA provides a financial incentive to target and prosecute men - just as in the Duke lacrosse case. Bill Clinton signed the Act into law knowing full well that it is an unconstitutional law. VAWA provides billions of dollars of financial boon to the legal industry to which he and Hillary have an allegiance. And, false prosecutions provide a legal tool to be used to destroy men and families - or for women to gain the upper hand in acrimonious divorces.



Various groups have voiced concern that VAWA violates due process, equal protection and other civil rights. The American Civil Liberties Union described VAWA as "troubling" and declared that the penalties were rash and the increased pretrial detention was "repugnant" to the US Constitution. The lacrosse players were paraded in front of the media as rapists when Michael Nifongs prosecutors knew they were innocent.



Dr. Stephen Baskerville, professor of government at Patrick Henry College states that false prosecutions are the greatest and most destructive civil rights abuse in America today.



District Attorney Nifong belongs to a legal profession where government lawyers across the country plunder the Violence Against Women Act by treating every allegation of rape or abuse made by women seriously, no matter how weak or absurd the allegation may be.



Since 1994, police departments have trained their officers to arrest the man whenever there is a domestic violence call because there is a financial incentive to arrest the man and no financial incentive to arrest the woman. Now, no matter who started the domestic dispute, the man will be arrested because the arrest generates federal VAWA money for the police department. Fathers Rights Organizations across the country have been complaining about this for years.



The states train their judges as well as their prosecutors to also discriminate against and prosecute innocent men. If you think District Attorney Nifong was overly enthusiastic to prosecute, consider the fact that when a woman shows at court to accuse her husband or lover of abuse, the court holds a secret hearing in which a restraining order is almost automatically issued against the man. These secret hearings are sometimes called ex-parte hearings. The judge issues the restraining order even though the accused wasnt informed that the hearing was taking place, and was provided no opportunity to confront his accuser or defend against the [false allegations in any way.



Social workers such as Lisa Tsiesen Gary of Beth Israel Hospital in Boston, regularly submitted clinical evaluations condemning men as abusers after Ms. Gary interview only the woman. Ms. Gary admitted she almost never interviews the abuser, as she refers to the male subjects of her clinical evaluations. The evaluations of social workers such as Ms. Gary that contain only information presented by the woman are considered clinical evaluations by judges and prosecutors across America.



David Douglas, a social worker who boasts he trains Massachusetts judges, court personnel, police and social workers also submitted clinical evaluations to the court that condemn men as abusers without ever having interviewed them. Mr. Douglas repeated the womans statements in his evaluations as fact, without asking the man for any statements.



Theyve created a new set of crimes, says Massachusetts Judge Milton Raphaelson. The new crimes the judge pointed to are non-crimes such as unintentionally violating a (false) restraining order. Judge Raphaelson explained that men are arrested because they were in a mall or supermarket when their estranged wives who had a restraining order against them showed up. She called the police and the man was arrested even though the police understood that the man was in the supermarket only to shop and had no idea his estranged wife would show up. The police arrest him because his crime is an opportunity for the police to earn VAWA money.



Men such as these are regularly imprisoned, said Judge Raphaelson not because they committed a crime, but as a result of judges and police trained to create violence against women to tap into the billions of dollars in VAWA money.



As an example, Massachusetts Judge Beverly Boorstein issued a restraining order against Mr. Daniel Iagatta, a quadriplegic confined to a wheelchair or hospital bed, because Mr.. Iagattas wife, who is divorcing him, requested a restraining order saying she was afraid of him. Mr. Iagatta cannot sit upright without being helped to do so. The legally defined standard for issuing a restraining order is the threat of imminent serious physical harm. But, Judge Boorstein issued the restraining order against Mr. Iagatta and created another instance of violence against women. Judge Boorstein is typical of state judges across the land who ignore the law that restraining orders be issued only when there is a threat of imminent serious physical harm and issue restraining orders based on a womans claim of fear.



Judge Beverly Boorstein, like Michael Nifong, was caught illegally altering evidence to find men guilty of abuse. Judge Boorstein had court hearing tapes edited, the docket doctored and she refused to allow Mr. Iagatta tapes or transcripts of secret hearings she held in his case. Massachusetts Superior Court and Appeals Court have also been caught altering public records. The Massachusetts Attorney Generals Office chose not to defend against these very allegations in federal court.

Superior Court Judge Hiller B. Zobel was caught threatening a father and his attorney for submitting court-certified documents that had been illegally altered to create abuse.



Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick, a lawyer, has been given forensic reports containing affidavits of three eyewitnesses and the reports of three audio engineers who found Judge Boorsteins hearing tapes were altered to remove testimony the three eyewitnesses stated under oath occurred at trial.



To date, Governor Patrick has done nothing regarding the crimes of prosecutors and judges in Massachusetts because these false prosecutions bring hundreds of millions of dollars to Massachusetts and the legal industry to which he belongs each year. Quadriplegic, Dan Iagatta, lost his wheelchair-equipped house via an order issued by Judge Boorstein to pay for expenses such as a court-appointed Guardian ad Litum, which is mandated by law to be paid for by the court.



Lawyers and judges are manipulating evidence not only to destroy well-to-do families such as the Duke lacrosse players families, it is well documented they manipulate evidence to destroy a quadriplegics life and end his relationship with his children.



The financial incentive of VAWA is clearly being plundered. Judge Milton Raphaelson sat on the Worcester District Court bench for ten years and stated that he experienced, about 60% of all restraining order violations were based on false allegations of abuse. The Duke lacrosse prosecutions and Mr. Iagattas case illustrate Judge Raphaelsons experience that most allegations of violence against women are based on false allegations.



What happens to the women who are caught bringing false allegations to prosecutors and to the courts? The same thing that happened to the stripper who falsely accused the Duke lacrosse players absolutely nothing. What happens to prosecutors such as Michael Nifong and judges who are caught plundering federal funds with cases they know are fraudulent?



Michael Nifong was temporarily disbarred and imprisoned for one day for falsely prosecuting the Duke lacrosse payers. But, asks legal scholars why isnt he being prosecuted for plundering federal VAWA money? The U.S. Attorneys Office understands Nifong prosecuted the Duke players to plunder federal funds, but why isnt the U.S. Attorneys Office prosecuting Nifong, Judge Beverly Boorstein or social workers, Lisa Gary or David Douglas? They are all part of a legal industry that clearly plunders billions of dollars of taxpayer money each year under the guise of protecting women. When 60% of the cases are based on false allegations, society is asking if VAWA was ever about protecting women or merely a boon for the legal industry?



Government officials who exercise virtually absolute control over the private lives of Americans have never been held accountable to anyone, reveals Dr. Baskerville. They represent the most destructive and dangerous abuse of power in America today.



The Legislative branch of government that passed VAWA in 1994 knew - as lawmakers - that the Act was unconstitutional when they voted to pass the law. The founders of this country warned against electing lawyers to the Legislature as they were afraid of the innate conflict of interest of legal professionals making laws that would benefit themselves. VAWA is an example of this conflict of interest of which the founders of the Constitution warned.



Since 1994, the Judicial branch of government has known that VAWA violates equal protection under the law but has refused to strike it down as unconstitutional because it provides billions of dollars a year to the legal profession to which they belong and have ultimate allegiance.



Since 1994, millions of families such as the three Duke players families have been destroyed by legal professionals such as Nifong solely to plunder federal funds without any thought whatever to the men and families that they destroy. Statistics reveal that more American families will be destroyed by law enforcement such as in the Duke lacrosse case than Al Qaeda ever could.



District Attorneys, judges, social workers dont want to know that the allegations are false because then they would lose the funding from the VAWA. The lacrosse players told the media that if they didnt come from well-off families, they wouldnt have won. This statement sheds light on a major problem facing our country.



Committees were formed, jobs were created, and money generated by creating a new set of crimes, said Judge Raphaelson. The Duke lacrosse players know what it is like to be the new criminal. One of the new crimes is to be falsely accused of rape or abuse by a woman.



Think about how much money is transferred to the legal industry from the Duke rape case alone. We have District Attorney Nifong bringing in large amounts of VAWA federal funding into his department to prosecute the Duke students. Secondly, theres the examination and physical and mental care of the rape victim. This is performed by social workers and womens programs caseworkers. All of these people operate under the presumption that the victim is telling the truth to the point that everyone noted during the media sensationalism during the case.



Then, there are the three defense teams for the Duke students. They took one million dollars collectively from the three Duke athletes families to defend against the false prosecution. None seem to talk about the plundering of federal funds by Nifong and his counterparts across the country - as they and the rest of the legal industry benefit from the false allegations also.



How much of these millions of dollars went to the rape victim? None. All of it went to prosecutors, case-workers, courts and the state all of whom have a vested interest in the rape victims false allegations.



The legal industry to which both the prosecution and defendants legal teams belong is thriving while knowingly destroying and/or allowing the innocent defendants to be destroyed along with their entire families.



Dr. Stephen Baskerville describes prosecutors and judges that allow false allegations of abuse as a government-run system that tears apart families, confiscates the wealth of families, and turns law-abiding citizens into criminals in ways they are powerless to avoid.



What we have in this country is a situation where the judiciary and the Bar (attorneys) run a racketeering scheme where they extort money from people under color of law, says former lawyer Else Baumgartner. The legal industry has created crimes before. Prohibition and the War Against Drugs just to name a few, stated Baumgartner.



Theyve created an industry out of nothing, revealed Judge Milton Raphaelson. They set up committees, wrote laws, created jobs, he explained. Its a trick theyve played on all of us.

Things like this are what made me move as far away from Massachusetts as I could get at the time, in 1974. I now live in South Dakota and have for more than 30 years. It's a hick conservative Republican state that's known for paying the worst wages in the nation, to be sure, but with all its drawbacks, it beats Mass. hands down.

Massachusetts has always been as crooked as a snake's back and that's the way they like it.

 

 

 
User Mood
Mellow

Message Emote
blank
November 1, 2007, 4:26 pm PDT

11/01 Teacher Sex Scandal, Pt. 1

Quote From: sweetladie

Let's take into consideration that this happened some 5 years ago. She is probably all cried out. Have you ever thought that she is trying to get her life back together for her self and her family! I do think that if she has nothing to hide that she should take the polygraph test.

Wow. This writer must live in that same small-minded town where this all happened. She already HAS taken a polygraph test and she PASSED it. These three punks took this teacher's life and career away from her and ruined them.

 

Enough already. I hope she bankrupts that school system when her lawsuit is decided.

 

First Page | Previous Page | 1 | Next | Last
Return to Message Board