Messages By: patsgirlboy

Quote From: Patykayks

Biggs,

 

I as you watched the entire trial and too read all of the trial transcripts just make sure I did not miss anything.  I agree with you, OJ is innocent.  Since there was no pursuing the REAL killer, he wil lalways be thought of as guilty. I wish OJ had worked more with the FBI to see if they could assist him in tracking down the people involved.  I truly beieve Fuhrman is the main one that planted the evidence and Vannatter was able to get blood from the lab for him to plant.

 

Too, there were blood stains later found by Fuhrman in August 1994,...weeks after the murders that just so happen to appear!  This is coverup at it's best.  I am really disappointed that Dr Phil could not be fair and have some of the OJ attorneys from the trial be on the show to maybe knock some sense into the Goldman's and the general public that OJ did not commit murder.

 

I wish people would go back and look at the trial transcipts and see where there was a lack of evidence and blood found had a preservative in it, meaning it was planted AFTER OJ was arrested.  Peopl just do not get it.

Quote From: chameleona

Students who attend public school obviously do not learn how to deal with these occurences, or we wouldn't have school shootings. How many home schools have been shot up? None that i know of. And as for the personal adult consualing, even the good teachers are overworked and often unavaliable, and as for the psychologists and coulsours- don't make me laugh. My school officials consistently said that i "had violent tendencies" and needed counsualing just because i enjoy hypothetical situations. (Admittedly some of them were not proper for a school environment, but they didn't make me crazy.) As for being silly at lunch, you get punished. As for recess, it's been cut out for all but the youngest children. I am not sheltered, I am not less advantaged. In fact, I have more advantages, because now i am capable of doing things that correspond with what i already know. School staff is not very avaliable and involved, and teachers are not always equipped with the latest technologies. at the very least, equalized classes (where abilities are mixed) should be stopped in academic subjects.  While i respect your opinion, I don't think that what you say is true in all cases.... although i do not think it is false in all cases, either.