Messages By: dallas3939

At the beginning of the first show, I automatically thought she was guilty...then about half way through I gave her the benefit of the doubt. Then on the second part of the show when Dr. Phil was talking to one of the boys on the phone and said that he failed the lie detector test, I thought "hmm maybe she IS innocent." But when Matt came out and told his side of the story, I totally believed him. Listen, it was what, six years since the incident? Of course he's not going to remember every single detail down to exactly how long the kiss was! Did anyone notice that he was looking straight at her the ENTIRE time?! She wouldn't even look his way! Then she tells Dr. Phil that she wants to 'take notes'? I think she just wanted something to concentrate on besides him! Yes, in high school, kids make stuff up, especially about teachers; but WHY would he continue in the lie so long afterward? He went on freakin' DR. PHIL people!! I think that he failed the lie detector test because he was maybe worried about forgetting specific details or something! Her reactions through the entire interview proved just how guilty she really is! And the fact that her husband was HER teacher in high school?! Hellooooo! I don't care if they met after high school or not! He was HER TEACHER! That's just disgusting! And he just looked like such a fool standing behind her! I mean, the notes would have done it for me if I was him! If she didn't have anything to hide, why write in code to your students?! "S.I.W.Y.W.J.F.M." She says meant "Sometimes I wish you were just FUNNIER Matt"??? Come on! Get real!!!! His answer was much more logical! She's a liar, and I hope and pray she doesn't get to teach again...they SHOULD have taken her license!!

Why would you give the floor over to someone and allow her to further victimize these boys if she isn't even willing to take a lie detector test herself??? You seriously got "Used"!!

I agree that the tests could have been off due to nerves--I don't seriously think the boys would come forward and take one on tv for the world to see if there isn't some truth, if it were all lies--they'd stay hidden out and just not comment.

As for people saying she passed a lie detector test already--well, so had those two boys--so what does that tell you--the fact that they were willing to take another and she flat out refused too is questionable.

Her excuses for what those codes meant are INSANE--it's CLEAR that they meant what Matt said they did--and it's clear she had rehearsed what she would say in the event that came up--she could not even make eye contact with that boy---Why would she have said  IASS!!! (I am soo sorry!!) to Matt, she said he looked upset by her previous message--if she had merely said what she claims the coded message said--why would she really care if he was upset--it wouldn't have been a big deal. She is an abuser--it's very very clear and whether those boys were consenting and 'feel' abused is of no matter, she abused the position of authority she was given. Professionals do not call on students to come spend the night at her house--how bizarre is that?? They do not put themselves in these types of positions.

I believe that there could have been more former students come out about this but after seeing these boys called liars they won't.

This woman looked VERY uncomfortable when Dr. Phil said that Matt was coming on the show--anyone else would welcome the opportunity to face the liar (if there were no truth to what's been said and to set the record straight)...she was alll about keeping her secrets hidden--and even tried to make the boy feel guilty by saying "you wanted to see me in jail"...something is REALLY REALLY off with this woman and I hope and pray the full truth comes out.

And Dr. Phil should have never practiced the double standard of allowing this accused child abuser the right to decline a lie detector test--he should have pulled the plug on her publicity stunt altogether. Of course she's seeking amuniton for her case against the school now.