My husband and I are supporting another man's child because in the State of California if a child was born during a marriage then that child is considered a child of the marriage. We did not find out this until the little girl was 10 years old when her mother decided she should (without consulting my husband) tell this little girl that the person she thought was her father really is not........... My husband is a wonderful man and continues to love this little girl as much as he ever has..... my question is why should we have to pay $1300.00 a month to support another man's child? DNA testing can get you off a murder charge but not out of supporting a child that is not yours. Where is the justice in that? People say the child should come first and I agree, the mother should find the "real father" and force him to pay support as well as her supporting the child herself.........
