Messages By: right_is_right

She is the 2nd teacher with in 3 years that has been fired from the Glen Rose district for having inappropriate relations with a student.  That teacher went on his way and she should too.

Just because she spent a bunch of money on a high priced lawyer to get her acquited does not mean she's innocent.  For example, we all know OJ is guilty for a double murder, but he was found not guilty in a court of law due to her expensive defense team.  Money can and will get you out of most any jam.

Matt and the other boy, both passed lie detector tests in the original inverstigation back in 2002.  They both felt that they would certainly pass another lie detector test, that's why they did go thru with it on the show.  So, they have only failed 1 polygraph test, so they have passed 1 and failed 1.  Joelle refused the polygraph. HMMMM.....only a liar would be scared of a polygraph especially if  she is going on the show to clear her name, I would think she would ask to take a polygraph. I would.

Also, lawyers who tend to think their clients are lying always tell them not to take polygraphs.  Just ask one yourself, if you don't believe me.

I'd also like to add, that the "I Never" game is pretty much like playing "Truth or Dare", why on Earth would you play that game in your classroom????

The notes?!!? What was she thinking?????  I totally believe Matt. 

I don't think it's the boys that have gone this far with a lie, I think it's Joelle that stands to lose everything if and she's the one that refused to admit what she's done with these students.

And it is rather odd, that she married her teacher about a year after she graduated from the HIGH SCHOOL and if you'll notice Doug is a good 10 years older than Joelle.  Makes you think.....

She married her "former" teacher within 1 year of graduating from HIGH SCHOOL.

Yes, that is very highly suspicious.  The way you write your comments, it's as if you are Joelle, or at least her best friend, maybe your Doug.

Like Dr. Phil always says. "Past behavior is the best way to predict future behavior." - Joelle crossed the line before and she crossed it again.  She's a habitual line stepper.

Don't you find it just a little funny, that the Joelle supporters of Glen Rose, only want to bad-mouth the supporters of the boys (i.e the victims of the whole shameful situation), the boys themselves and even their parents.  We all know the parents, we all know the kids.  There was even a post I saw on here yesterday, where a former female student of Ms. Ogletree's claimed that Ms. Ogletree also made inappropriate comments and advances to her brother and her brothers friends and she believes firmly that Ms. Ogletree would act out like that again.  The former female student even said her brother and his friends never said anything to the officials because they didn't want to be a part of the whole drama and that is why I believed the first boy recanted his story so that he wouldn't have to go thru the drama of all this. 

I pray Joelle never sees a dime of the money for which she's suing GRISD.  Not one single dime!!

1. A mistrial does not confirm innocence.

2. In no way has the teachers innocence been proven in any way.  Even Dr. Phil couldn't tell us who he believed and he almost always does.

3. From watching her on Dr. Phil she looks more suspectful than ever.

4. To be honest, I don't want anyone who has ever been investigated by CPS to be in our schools. Period. End of story.  Where there's smoke, there's fire.  My children are way too important for me to gamble with their innocence.

And contrary to what you said about "grwatcher", I think Glen Rose needs to be protected from people like YOU!!! I am Glen Rose and my family has been there since it was founded.  You're the only one shaming the community, I mean besides Joelle, of course.