Message Boards

Messages By:

September 15, 2007, 12:36 pm PDT

Southwest Airlines was RIGHT

 Dr. Phil,
You got it wrong this time.  Southwest was right to tell that young woman to put more clothes on.  I don't want to see anyone's underwear when I'm in public, male or female.

She had obviously pulled down her skirt and shirt to make it more chaste.  In a civil society we need to wear clothing.  What about social norms and standards?  You got it wrong.  People ned to wear clothes when they go out!


 
November 30, 2007, 6:09 pm PST

17yo should not go to spring break

OK.  Perhaps the mom should loosen up and let her son have some "rope."

But send this kid to South Padre island for spring break where the kids are rebelling and showing off to each other how ridiculous they can be?  NO WAY!

If he gets drunk and has a car accident he could kill someone or hurt himself.  If he has impaired judgment and ends up having sex with some random person, he could get a disease and have life long consequences from a trip like this.

From my world view, it's not a good idea for a hormone-raged teen boy to be around a bunch of drunk kids who are making bad choices.  God says that we should be pure in thought and in deed, and putting a teen boy around a bunch of bikini-clad girls and boys who are intoxicated is not a safe place for his thought life.

I'm not against cutting loose and having a good time with friends.  I've enjoyed the beach and swimming in the Carribean and the Indian oceans.  I'm not anti fun or anti sex.  As evidence my wife and I are expecting baby #6!  I think that the mob mentality of hormonal and drunken kids is not healthy.

What is his life purpose?  Will going to "spring break" help him accomplish his purpose?  This ought to be the question  to ask about *everything* we  do in life.
 
May 17, 2008, 6:42 pm PDT

CHARLATAN!!

How dare you give that fraud a platform to peddle his wares! He is no more credible than those Houston hucksters charging for consultations with Dr. Phil and Robin!


It's obvious his readings were nothing more than simple broad probes into the lives of people - come on - asking if there was a "Michael" or a "David" somehow tied to *someone* in the audience? According to Social Security, Michael has been #1 or #2 since at least 1993. David is in the top 16 since 1993.

In the last 11 years there have been about 26,000 motorcycle related deaths, and of course, given a sample size as even as small as your audience there will undoubtedly be someone who will say "that's me!"

On top of that, there were a bunch of "dry wells" which he dropped VERY quickly when the target could not relate to his probe.

This is total bunk and a fraud, and for you to have that person on your stage is an insult to your viewers!
 

First Page | Previous Page | 1 | Next Page | Last Page
Return to Message Board