Message Boards

Messages By: seenfff


Message Emote
blank
May 17, 2008, 10:28 am PDT

Questions

        Lets say I was your child. I am diagnoised ADHD. My interests were army men, action figures, outdoors, dinosaurs, and I only hung out with one friend locally. (Down the street.) Because of Fights with my older brother and a zero tolerence with bullies at school. I averaged a fight a day with my brother and a fight at school every other day.

      How would you punish me? How would you handle a babysitter?

 

     Why do you obey laws, rules, ordinances, and so on? Is it because you don't want to pay fines or spend time in jail or the humilation of being caught in wrong doing?

 

Message Emote
blank
May 17, 2008, 10:57 am PDT

Comment

Quote From: PennyLane78

Do you have anything to say to the rest of my post? Or just this perverted little comment?

         I thought my previous post covered it. Since I'm apparently wrong, I'll explain. You have no way of knowing that spanking didn't play a role or not. Positive reinforcement only works if it's something the child wants. The consequences should be plain that this set of behavior will have this effect. Another words, this cause will have this effect.

       You and I do disagree when it comes to spanking since you're against spanking entirely, and I'm in favor as long as it's done with a open palm. At least when I was younger, I'd consider a whip, belt, paddle as an act of war, and I'd make sure such would disappear when given the opportunity. I'm sure some one down the Black River has a paddle and 5 belts.

      As to your second comment, I thought that you should be notified; your comment could be interpreted in this way.

 

Message Emote
blank
May 17, 2008, 8:41 pm PDT

Very good point.

Quote From: kathleen27

Society has an obligation to intervene in families where the well being of children is being threatened.  We have come to a point in our evolution as to where this has been, in some cases taken to a radical, and in my opinion, dangerous extreme. 

We are supposedly debating spanking, yet the forum, as did the show, deals with more brutality than with spanking.  I am opened to different opinions, and I'm not the final word on anything...yet, no sane person uses belts, brooms and boards in the name of administering a spanking.  That is abuse, and yes, it can cause physical harm...never mind the emotional terror...makes me wonder...what exactly is it that we are debating...and if a person is pro-spanking, does that put him/her into the category of the abusers?

One poster had mentioned that she gives her daughter a pat on the rear as a sign of affection.  Another poster inferred it may be construed as molestation.  These people can actually call, and they will, CPS, with their suspicions of what goes on in our lives.  I'm afraid of them! 

It's pretty sad when something that innocent can be brought into a sexual context, just as someone who slaps the rear on occasion, can be dragged into the arena of the belt beaters.

I'm all for opened discussion, and everyone posting has the right to voice an opinion.  Just makes me wonder if some extremists are the reason that CPS is so overloaded with bogus calls, so they really cannot devote sufficient time to those that are really serious.  Wonder if they don't hear so much of the manure, that they become jaded and cynical as to where the actual abuses are lost in their mountain of unfounded calls.  Too many children are being hurt, they are often found staved, or worse...many turn up dead.  Too many reports of sexual abuse are given a quick sweep...never could fathom why, but when you hear about a pat on the bottom possibly being seen as molestation, it kind of opens your eyes as to what CPS must get on a daily basis.

I'm all up for an intelligent debate, but hey, don't throw dirty water.  I'm really glad my kids are past the point of anyone "observing" them.  I am a hugger, a patter and a kisser...Were I to be starting a family today, it would be on top of a mountain!  Damn it!  We have gone way too far, yet not far enough.  Common sense, is it a thing of a by gone era?

    The only part I either overlooked or was missed is when a child is smart enough to realize Children Services suddenly gives them more power than their parents.

     I do agree that a proper spanking "open palm on the bottom, which is the safest orphase" won't cause harm. Big difference between swats and just repeatedly whacking someone. A swat is nowhere near full force.

 

Message Emote
blank
May 17, 2008, 8:47 pm PDT

Response

Quote From: julie1418

Do you really believe you can HIT the ADHD out of a child?

 

I obey laws because I have internalized a sense of right and wrong.  If you knew you wouldn't get caught or suffer an external consequence, would YOU break laws??

     Julie, you might want to read the question over, and you might want to dig out what actually worked, which might work as a punishment to other ADHD children. Another words, there are children who respond better by the occasional punishment by a simple swat on the butt and a "no, that's bad." At the same time, there's children who were like me that required a very odd punishment indeed to get the point across.

    As to your answer to your second question, right and wrong is taught unless you're trying to tell me that you were a perfect angel from infant to now?

 

Message Emote
blank
May 17, 2008, 9:04 pm PDT

Response

Quote From: momxpress

I don't know you but I'm assuming you're more than this behaviour.

 

I'm also not interested in handling or managing you.  I'm interested in your choices and opinion even if it's "no".   I also love outdoors and think dinosaurs are cool... I think we'd work on a plan or agenda and if you didn't want to do something that'd be ok .. we'd do something else.  And, if you had to do something you didn't want to just because sometimes you have too like brush your teeth... then you could pick something else you wanted to do after.  

 

My feeling is you have a hard time feeling in control in social situations  and "fighting" is the way to be heard or try to get your way across especially since you can't process multi-level info quickly.  Managing social issues like communication breakdowns causes severe emotional dysregulation and spirals out of control kinda like the Cat and the Hat trying to hold a whole bunch of stuff and not being able to manipulate it quickly enough and it collapses.  Social situations are fast multi-level exchanges unlike rote ABC learning.   Just my thoughts, since you mention your ADHD dx. 

 

If ppl only don't break laws to not get in trouble then why do ppl help others without being paid?

       Yes, I'm a bit older than from 2-13 these days, and I think a bit wiser than my younger self. Thanks for answering the question.

       That's a good one. Unfortunately, I'm a quite a bit more underhanded than that. I'll let you think that you're in control when I really am.

 

Message Emote
blank
May 17, 2008, 9:16 pm PDT

You really should reread what he wrote

Quote From: yoshiyoshi

Ed, your statement about spanking a child to a degree where they're screaming and crying reminds me of a bad experience I had with that once. I saw a father in Disneyworld, right in front of the monorail screaming and hitting his child. He wasn't just a terror to his child, but to everyone else around him. I stood there waiting for him to notice me, if it wasn't for my parents screaming for me to come down, I would've stood there and waited for him to say, "What are you staring at?"

 

I would've looked right at him and said, "I'm staring at a child abuser."

 

Still makes me sick to think of it this day. That's why I'm so against spanking, I don't know what kind of person can see a child in that level of terror, and think they're gaining something from that.

     In terms of spanking a child until he/she cries in pain, the other poster agrees with you from what he/she wrote.

     At the same time, if you spank properly, the child shouldn't cry, and the child can always simply start flipping out by learning by doing so forces a more tolerable punishment, which defeats the purpose of the meaning of punishment.

 

Message Emote
blank
May 18, 2008, 8:32 am PDT

If this was a serman, I think an amen is in order.

Quote From: kathleen27

If you are an adult and you seriously screw up at work, you will not be "spanked"...you may, however, get fired.  If you break the law, you will get a time out.  It's called prison time...and you are OUT of the mainstream of society.  Curse in your wife or husband's face, well, you may be better off with a "spanking" because you will more than likely get a divorce, or live in a loveless marriage.

Any form of disclipines used on a child to instill respect and to prepare that child for the future, are not things that can realistically carry over into the adult world as consequense for poor behavior. .  I cannot take away my husband's remote control, he cannot remove my computer because we've had an argument.  Tell me, today, as a grown woman.."go to your room", or "you are grounded", I'll tell you to go to hell!  Just try to take away my car, my cell phone...it isn't happening.  The same goes for spanking, none of this is appropriate in the adult world.

I condemn any abuse of a child, yet I am not totally opposed to spanking...notice, I did not say beating, bashing, using weapons, I said spanking.  A last resort for a serious offense, if your other methods fail.  Parents have a duty to teach their children what is, and what is not acceptable...I have to laugh when the parent/child relationship is compared to the work place.  Parents, the good ones, are literally fighting for their childrens' future.  No loving parent wants to see their adult child fail, lose jobs, have unhappy relationships...hence, we try to guide them.  I have read posts saying how out of control some kids are today, and I cannot argue the point.  It is 100 times worse than my growing up in the 1970's.  In fact, it's like the planet has changed, and not for the better.  I am lucky.  Not a better mother, just very lucky that I did not have to spank.  My kids were always respectful and polite.  Crossing streets was NOT a problem..I held them like my hand was a vice grip.  There was no running in the streets...I never let them outside alone, so they were not able to run...I was always there.  The kind of car that I drive is not relevant...neither is the style of my home.  We are not discussing socio-economics on the forum, we are talking about the pros and cons of spanking being used as punishment.

Some of the postings of the beatings are horrific.  It was child abuse.  Others who were spanked, as I define it...well, it doesn't sound any different from my own life...and I was NOT abused! 

I did preach...not the religious kind...I just talked about everything...why things were not right, why people get into trouble.  I used T.V.,videos ,read books...any child oriented tool I could find, to get a conversation going about what was nice, and not nice.  My kids threw a few tantrums, but not many.  Somehow, they didn't get to me.  Other mothers really cannot deal with them, but as long as it wasn't in public, I let them burn themselves out.  Usually, it was over something stupid, like I bought the wrong colored ice pop...but somehow, after the "fit" was ignored, the ice pops got eaten and nobody died.  After the age of 4, all the tantrums stopped...I think the common ages are from 2 to 4, but it also depends on the child...and the parents.  I threw one tantrum.at 5, saw my friend do it, must have thought it looked like a great idea...three smacks on my bottom put an end to that..my mother did not allow tantrums.  It did not make her an abuser.

I am not a violent person.  If you spit in my face, no matter who you are...I'm hitting you...that goes for husbands, neighbors, children, anyone.  I'm not afraid to "pick" on anyone my size or bigger if I'm being disresected in a vile manner...same for someone who is smaller...only them, I'll spank..and not hard...an adult, well, I'd use the force God gave me.  I do NOT feel heroic being a puke, either.

Children DO have rights.  Those rights are to be safe from abuse and to be cared for.  They do not, and should not, have the rights of adults, as with these rights come responsibilities that go way beyond the range of expectations of a child.  

Adults, parents...we also have rights...and they include the right to be treated with respect, to be appreciated for what we do, and to be seen as human beings, not battering rams for out of control children.  I know too many liberal parents who grew to dislike their children.  Sounds horrible, but adults don't have to accept abuse either...and some of these children ARE parent abusers.  Imagine being threatened, for no valid reason, by a child..."I'll call CPS on you"....to avoid being punished!  That is ABUSE.  We cannot allow it, yet so many defend it..oh, it's the age, they are lashing out, feeling their oats...

Unlss there is a developmental or emotional issue, the kids are taking advantage of a permissive society where any parental action is now...ABUSE! 

I'd take my child to a therapist if any of them exhibited some of the behavior I've seen.  I'd want to know...is there really something bio-chemically wrong?  Are some other factors at play that really need professional help?  If so, I'd move mountains to get all that was needed.  If not, well, maybe it would be time to put the little darling over my knee and give three or four good smacks on the backside.  Is it embarassing?  No more than what some kids are doing to parents.  Maybe it is necessary, in some cases to show how being embarassed feels...perhaps there may be some empathy on the part of the child if they realize how it feels.  Does it hurt?  Leaving aside the "weapons", an opened hand, as I recall, stings for less than 5 minutes.  With me, it sort of brought me back into the reality that I was not the boss and not able to disrupt the household. Not a terible lesson, as I turned out just fine.  Bear in mind, there were no weapons, no excessive force, and it was done 5 times in my life. 

I'm happy not to have had to use it.  If the case had been different, I most definately would have.  Spanking is just one of many tools...and like all others, taken to the extreme, it can be abuse.  I watched one episode of Super Nanny where a child was forced to sit at a dinner table for 2 hours untiil she ate...the child was cryng so hard, for so long, it made me sick.  THAT was abuse, in my opinion, and it would NOT have happened in my house.  I'd cave on dinner..fix something else...or wait till later...because Jo Frost says it's O.K. doesn't convince me. ..it was bullying a little girl to an extreme.  Wonder if that will evolve into a serious eating disorder?

I'm so glad my children are over 18, in college, and really nice people.  Luck is also a factor, don't kid yourselves!  I have been blessed.

   AMEN!
 

Message Emote
blank
May 18, 2008, 8:49 am PDT

Are you in favor of Anger Management

Quote From: mandelbrot

I agree entirely.

I just don't see how hitting children does anything productive. What are we trying to teach them? To solve their problems by hitting people?

I don't speak out of theory. Of our five children, two have finished college and two others are in high school. None of them have ever been in a physical fight at school. All of them have got good grades and have always come home with good behavior reports on their report cards. All of them have or have had jobs that they did well. All of them are productive members of society.

I can't see how hitting them would have made them better people than they are.

It's still too early to tell how our youngest is going to turn out. But he has four siblings who make excellent role models for him, and I'm sure he'll turn out fine too without ever being spanked.

Hitting a pillow, matress, and a punching bag are primary Anger Management playbook. All this does is teach a child to hit something when angry. If it's a true anger problem like rage, it won't remain an inanimate object for very long.

Next is verbal venting, which has problems of its own.

Then, try walking it off. It's easy to see because they won't care if you're in the way or not.

Options that work mostly are constructive vents like cleaning, building, or in some cases destroying something that needs destroyed. Arguably chopping wood, removing items needing to be broke down, or removing gravel/rocks. Or, non-reality vents such as Video Games.

 

      Was it a prep or other private school? It also appears that such a punishment wasn't needed. But, it's only what worked for your children. Not all would have reacted the same way. You're welcome to become a temporary foster parent in your area even though the worst you'd get is watered down issues from a previous arrangement.

 

Message Emote
blank
May 20, 2008, 10:06 am PDT

Affection vs Punishment

Quote From: PennyLane78

You should be "notified" that if you suggest that spanking is ok but showing affection by patting on the bottom is not then you have a PROBLEM.

    I wrote that your comment could be construed, which means viewed, considered, or believed, to be molestation. My thought was that this was not your intent, so I felt obligated to point it out to you since I also already posted that fell onto what you posted other than that comment. I felt no obligation to repeat myself.

    Punishment is nothing affectionate. A punishment is the effect of a cause. Whether someone claims having a strong sense of right and wrong or not; the fact remains someone or someones along the way made sure that this person would understand this is good behavior, tolerant behavior, and bad behavior. And, these behaviors will have this/these result/s.

   Now, Affections involves love, intimacy, cherishment, and so on. The butt or "bottom" as you put it; this is considered a sexual object within affection. Hence, why your comment could be construed as molestation, which would be far far worse than a simple spanking and poses an additional issues within this topic because of spank with love.

 

Message Emote
blank
May 20, 2008, 10:12 am PDT

Accept is more to the point

Quote From: PennyLane78

I personally only send my daughter to her room or to a quiet place if she needs time to calm down. This is a useful tool she can use through her entire life. If emotions are running high then a person needs to take a few minutes to calm down.

Any punishment can be over used. However, I don't see any need or use for striking a child ever and I've yet to hear a reason for it.
    Under what I can make of your beliefs, morals, and views, you never will either.
 

First | Prev | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | Next | Last
Return to Message Board