This whole arguement is mute. Those men who are posting that men shouldn't have to pay if they don't want the baby have a valid point, however, imagine what that type of law could do to single mothers. Listen, I recieve child support, a small tiny amount every month that doesn't even come close to covering the cost of my child. However, I work as hard as I can to make sure my daughter loves her biological father and sees him as much as possible.
If a woman chooses to keep the baby, the man should pay. He had sex, he is responsible. If he doesn't want a baby, he should make sure he is taking the precautions necessary to avoid that end consequence. This isn't the 1960's, I understand that BC has a 4-6% failure rate, I'm one of them. However, it is far less likely to happen if both parties are using protection. If he doesn't wear a condom, he is responsible for the outcome, just as the mother is.
And with the whole, if the mother gives the child up...unless the father takes the child and does not take away parental rights for the mother, she pays support. If the mother gives the child up for adoption, the father doesn't have to pay.
$500 a month for 18 years is a sorry excuse for a father in any state,city or nation. Any man, any real man, would take resonsibility for his actions and do the right thing.
I am so sick of this whole equality thing, woman's lib just gave us the right to get a job AND do all the housework, children rearing and raising, where is the liberation in that?
Men and women are not equal, they never will be because they are different. It is the woman's body, it is her choice, however in most states a man can petition to terminate his parental rights thus removing the child support. If he is slimy enough to do this, he shouldn't be in the child's life in the first place.