Message Boards

Messages By: maremeadow

User Mood
Good

Message Emote
blank
April 21, 2006, 2:22 pm PDT

Many Adult Males are DOGS

Please note.. I did NOT call them MEN in the title.  Real men step up and face their responsibilities.  Matt, on the other hand is an fully grown child... worse, a DOG.  Having raised three daughters without ONE pennies child support, court ordered and NEVER paid, I feel like an expert on the subject. 

  

 

  

  

 

Furthermore, I am raising my severely autistic grandson. This because when his mother (my traumatic brain injured daughter) told him that she would get an abortion because she didn't think she was ready to have a child and their marriage was VERY rocky.  He threatened her and basically forced her to have the child.  Halfway through the pregnancy he was beating her, raping her and throwing her down stairs because she "moved too slowly."  She left him when the baby was 20 days old and has lived with me ever since.  I am supporting them both.  He has paid $15.00 in child support in 2 1/2 years.  This child is 2 1/2 years old and is severely handicapped.  He has not made one attempt to communicate in any way, no mimicking sounds, not walking... this boy needs a LOT of help!  I feel quite certain that his condition is due to the abuse that the mother took during the pregnancy.  He also took the child off his insurance and his therapies alone cost close to $2,000 a month... my burden! 

  

 

  

  

 

These fathers all had rights... they INSISTED on having these children.  Then they ALL abandoned them emotionally, financially and otherwise. 

  

 

  

  

 

My philosophy has been simple.  I step up and assume the responsibility.  No court, no hassles.. just let the dogs run and take care of the babies.  The fight is NOT worth it because it only adds legal fees and stress and worry to the already difficult situation.  However, in my opinion, this country is seriously failing it's children by allowing deadbeat dad's to avoid the financial responsibility of the children they created. 

  

 

  

  

 

Whether a man chooses to be a father or not is his choice UP FRONT... practice abstinence, use protection or step up and take care of the child. 

  

 

  

  

 

Matt, shame on you!  That baby looks identical to you... sweet and adorable.  How cold and selfish can a human be?  You are despicable!

  

 

  

 
User Mood
Good

Message Emote
blank
April 21, 2006, 2:32 pm PDT

You didn't listen to her rebuttle

Quote From: uwood2_2

I may be a minority in this I know, BUT I have, for a long time I have felt as though the child bearing issue was extremely one sided.  (and Yes, I have children of my own!)  

Women have ALL the rights when it comes to having children.      

Courts automatically presume that women are the better suited parent.      

If a woman gets pregnant and does not want a child, she has options (yes abortion or adoption).  Men have NO options.      

The BIG issue here is that she lied! - If a woman tells a man she cannot bear children then she alone should have the responsiblity of the child IF he does not want children.  She should have kept her mouth shut!    

If a man decides that he does not want children he should have that option.  Along with that option, he should also have to sign a legal document stating that he will never have contact with that child and if he should decide to (later in life) then he should have to pay back 100% of the assessed support for the child.    

If he chooses to step up and do what the law (now) states he should do, he should (perhaps) be able to claim that child as a tax deduction at the very least (which does not always happen).    

A woman can decide that she does not want "her" child to see its father- whether out of spite or concern.  A man must then go to court, if he chooses, to get that right.    

    

With ALL that said!  I do not EVER think this lawsuit will go anywhere.  It would set a precedence     

that would have men in court from now till dooms day!  I think their opinions would NOT be based on whether the issue is right or wrong, I think it will be solely based on the repercussions it would have on past, present and future cases.  

   

   

She claims that she did NOT lie.  Dr. Phil read her statement on the show.

  

 

 

  

 

She is only guilty of loving a BEAST.  At least she is living up to the responsibility of caring for this lovely child.  I have never seen such a cold and heartless human being as this ANIMAL who has filed this suit.

  

 

 

  

 

BOTH parties are responsible for pregnancies.  If a man doesn't want children he has only 1 guarantee.... keep the ZIPPER CLOSED. It doesn't matter WHAT the woman says.  It doesn't matter if she sets out to get pregnant...  he has a choice.... DON'T HAVE SEX UNTIL YOU ARE READY TO HAVE CHILDREN!!!!

  

 

  

 
User Mood
Good

Message Emote
blank
April 21, 2006, 2:38 pm PDT

SPARE ME

Quote From: cgeorge22

Matt is 100% right.  His constitutional and privacy rights are being viloated.  In this day and age, HE CERTAINLY SHOULD HAVE A CHOICE!   

  

I URGE EVERYONE TO SUPPORT THIS!  WRITE YOUR LOCAL CONGRESSMEN AND SENATORS AND TELL THEM TO SUPPORT ROE vs WADE for MEN. 

  

  

  

  

  

My God, there are more of them!
 

First Page | Previous Page | 1 | Next Page | Last Page
Return to Message Board