Messages By:

November 29, 2005, 4:07 pm PST

Dr. Phil was right...

Quote From: mooses

Dr. Phil, 

  

You missed two very important points today.   

  

#1  Aileen, her husband, Aileen's daughter and granddaughter had an understanding that if he passed away first, Aileen would put the land in Aileen and her daughter's name.  Aileen has refused to do that in any form.  Aileen could establish a trust that would protect her and possibly put her daughter in a better position tax wise.  Aileen has showed the nation that she did not honor her husband's wishes or her own commitment to her daughter. 

  

#2  Aileen made a Power of Attorney, but refused to show it to her daughter.  Why?  What did she have to hide?  The daughter did not care who had the power of attorney, she just wanted to make sure that one was in place.  Often, when people won't show you documents, it is because they don't have them.  Dr. Phil, when you asked Aileen why she didn't show her daughter the Power of Attorney, she said that the attorney said that she didn't have to.  The real answer is Aileen did not want to, she was being ornery.  Dr. Phil, you allowed Aileen to put the responsibility on the lawyer.  If Aileen was trying to get along, she would have gladly showed it to her daughter without having to be asked.  What a slap in the face that she would show it to you, Dr. Phil, and not her own daughter!  More orneryiness! 

  

Aileen has showed herself to be someone who can't be trusted.  She does not honor her husband's wishes or her own commitments.  She purposely hides information for no good reason knowing that it will hurt her daughter's feelings and foster a lack of trust.  All of this could have been avoided if Aileen had simply established a trust and shown her daughter a copy of the Power of Attorney. 

  

Aileen's daughter and granddaughter don't trust her with good reason.  Aileen has destroyed their respect for her.  Aileen's daughter is smart to ask that she have a Power of Attorney.  She needs to go one step further and ask that she not be made the executor.  What a headache that will be!  Pay someone to do that.  It will be worth every penny. 

  

Dr. Phil, I'm surprised that you let that little old lady sucker you!  Aileen's daughter and granddaughter don't want to pay anymore taxes they have to and want a smooth transition when the time comes.  That is not unreasonable.  Aileen doesn't care about that and refuses to establish a trust, purposely causing hard feelings.  Aileen's daughter and granddaughter described her as controlling.  Aileen is in control and has no consideration for anyone but herself.  This is probably her normal for her, but now that the husband is gone and not able to moderate her behavior, the intensity of her controlling, selfish behavior has increased. 

  

Dr. Phil, please rethink this show and your responses.  Give the daughter and granddaughter the support they deserve.  Tell Aileen to show her love for her family by drawing up a trust.  Stop doing things calculated to hurt feeling and to show that Aileen is in control.  Aileen can be in control and loving!  Challenge her to that.  

  

Dr. Phil, thanks for listening. 

  

Mooses 

The "understanding" that Aileen's daugther had with her late father could have taken place or it could have been made up by Davene and her daugther to "guilt" Aileen into signing away her property.  We don't really know if this "understanding" really existed.  Furthermore, it is not "onery" for someone to not allow the heirs to see their Will and/or Power of Attorney.  They are not entitled to see any documentation regarding an estate.  The only time they become entitled to see this documentation is when the estate is being probated.   I am glad Dr. Phil stood up to those two dreadful individuals.  They simply want something for nothing.  They need to earn their way in life just like Aileen and her husband did... with hard work!   Maybe then they can earn enough where their heirs can fight over them while they are still alive! 
 
January 31, 2006, 7:29 am PST

Respectfully disagree

I am obviously no expert like Dr. Phil, but I respectfully disagree with some of the issues raised here today.  Maybe I am too wrapped up in  my daughter (who is my only child), but with her getting ready to leave for college this fall, there would be no way I could ever call her a "moocher" if she came back home.  I love my daugther unconditionally and without question.  She is a pleasure to be around, very responsible and very considerate of others.  She is going to be so missed and I would welcome the chance to have her home again.  To call your child a "moocher" and want them out of the house is something I cannot even imagine.  I guess I don't have the terrible situation some of the families do, but I always want my child to know there is no place more welcoming or safe than her home. 
 
July 6, 2006, 5:17 am PDT

Agree with Matt

Although I am going to be "blasted", I have to say that I agree with Matt.     In just the same way a woman has a right to choose, so should a man.  It is a responsibility for BOTH parties when they choose to have sexual relations.  It should not be the complete responsibility of the man nor the woman.  However, if these relations should result in an unwanted pregnancy, either party should have the right to choose whether or not they want to be a parent.  This choice should not be exclusive to the woman.  If the man is willing to give up his parental rights he should be allowed to do so without being harassed or stalked by either the woman or the justice system.   There have been too many one-sided issues of parental rights.   The woman may get an abortion without any consent by the man.  The woman may sue for child support but Heaven forbid the man should attempt to do the same thing.  He is then looked at as less of a man and more of a "mooch".  Women want to be treated the same as men.  Men should have the same right to choose.  By the way, I am a 44 year old married woman with one child.   

 
March 8, 2007, 3:59 am PST

Who Cares???!!!

Lacy Peterson was not the only person who has been murdered in thsi country and she will not be the last!  Why oh why did we then, and do we now, give her so much coverage?!?!  Is is because she was white, middle class, surburban, desperate housewife?!  Of course it is!  If she had been hispanic, black, asian, etc., of a poor background no one would have given her a second glance!  (By the way, I am white, middle-class).   Do I believe Scott Peterson is guilty - I have my doubts!   If Scott Peterson had been so careful not to be caught, why would he have admitted to being at the marina where coincidentially her body would be found months later?   Maybe his little road ***** Amber Frey was so angry when Scott confessed he was married that she killed, or had someone kill, Lacy then after finding out where Scott had been that day have Lacy's body conveniently thrown in the bay at the very same location where Scott had been.   She could have enacted revenge on both parties at the same time. 

 

Anyway, can we put this case away and wait for the 'Next Big Thing' to come along?!?!  Good grief I am sick of seeing this story everywhere you go!

 

 

 
September 16, 2008, 12:56 pm PDT

Unbelievable Grief and Sadness

In the span of the past twenty years or so I have lost the following:

 

My grandmother  1987

 

My uncle  1991

 

My father  1993

 

My brother 1993


My grandmother 1994

 

A close friend 1995

 

My grandfather 1997

 

My BEST friend 1997

 

My mother 1999

 

My uncle 2001

 

I feel as though I am a ship in an ocean of sadness.   When my parents died I felt as though I was an orphan.  It is a feeling beyond description. 

 

You will get through this, you will feel as though you are going to die to but (fortunately or unfortunately) you just go on - somehow.

 

 

 

 

 

 

First Page | Previous Page | 1 | Next Page | Last Page
Return to Message Board